Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live19:11Richelieu's wide range of preliminary designsQ&A
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:14:43Why France selected the Dunkerque designQ&A
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?27:19A seven-to-ten Japanese ratio and small capital shipsNotable Point
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...5:02Dunkerque, Strasbourg and Béarn at BrestChapter
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...10:26French fast capital ships and Allied naval strategyChapter
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...24:12What was at stake in the 1940 fleetChapter
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...1:03:12French ships and the allocation of British capital shipsChapter
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...1:05:55French capital ships could give Hood time for a refitNotable Point
- Marine Nationale go all Free French in June 1940...1:21:02Fast capital ships for the Home FleetChapter
- ShinMaywa US-2: Seaplane for the Future6:17Why allies value a small fleet with a specialist roleNotable Point
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?18:33The scale of the French fleet in 1939Notable Point
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?19:19Why Britain would not gamble on ambiguous French ordersChapter
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?58:40More Atlantic capital ships against German raidersChapter
- What happens if the French navy goes all Free French in 1940?1:01:36Fast ships find the fight and heavy ships close inNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)1:57:41Strasbourg sits more clearly on the fast-battleship sideNotable Point
- What happens if the entirety of the French Navy decides to carry on fighting in WWII? (Patreon Live)2:47:04French fast battleships fit a Royal Navy weaknessNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress6:25:51Scharnhorst and the disputed battleship boundaryNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:50:07Six Nelsons under a twenty-capital-ship treatyQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:55:24Would France build larger Dunkerques or more of them?Q&A
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P1 of ?1:43:43How to place a fast capital ship between battleship and battlecruiserNotable Point
- Why didn't the Royal Navy go for High Pressure boilers & what if they got 850psi boilers in 1934?1:08:39A stronger Royal Navy alters the French-fleet riskNotable Point
- Battle of Jutland: The Strategic Leadership which both defined it and denied it satisfaction20:37Why subdivision matters to battlecruiser survivalNotable Point
- How Pursuing Peace(with bonus cost cutting) can lead to War: 1930s London Naval Treaty Leadership1:18:05Tardieu traps France between parity and economyChapter
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!1:51:51Modernizing Lyon with Dunkerque gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:08:23Why France would replace the Courbets before the BretagnesQ&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership1:28:03Why smaller Deutschland guns would not prevent DunkerqueQ&A
- What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?59:46Fast Nelsons would outmaneuver Japanese and American battle linesChapter
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...1:45:23France and Italy face new capital-ship choicesChapter
- Of Two Submarines, in two wars... The sinkings of HMHS Britannic & IJS Kongo1:24:55Is Dunkerque a battleship or a battlecruiser?Q&A
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers43:45French carriers and strategic independenceNotable Point
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers45:35Why Dunkerque's protection matters more than the battlecruiser labelNotable Point
- French Naval Aviation Doctrine & Other potential carrier powers of the 1930s25:34Speed, range, and the raider-hunting carrierChapter
- Bruships 162: I can feel the Kalax in the Air Tonight... Oh Books! Naval History Questions & Chat3:24:26French naval guns were constrained by metallurgy and productionQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!31:11Faster loading requires a redesigned German turretQ&A
- Naval History Live: Operations Tiger and Splice2:40:41Would France build Dunkerque without naval treaties?Q&A
- Check Campaign 14: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign15:48Dunkerque, Richelieu, and France's two-theater problemQ&A
- French Naval Aviation: A Quick Historical Overview & Introduction to it's Squadrons15:21Interwar aviation spread across cruisers, battleships, and colonial shipsNotable Point
- Imperial Star Destroyers if designed by the World's Major Navys in 193844:40Dunkerque under treaty and infrastructure constraintsChapter
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?1:32:06Dunkerque's forward main battery on a French Star DestroyerChapter
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?1:54:27Why French fleet design depended on British strategic supportNotable Point
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London2:02:09France and Italy gain earlier battleships and competing carriersChapter
- Europa & Giuseppe Miraglia: The Regia Marina's Love for Seaplane Carriers19:26Parity with Italy traps French naval planningNotable Point
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:05:25The armor problem with a Dunkerque-style PanzerschiffQ&A
- Check Campaign 3: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign47:42Were Scharnhorst and Dunkerque battleships or battlecruisers?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:44:21Dutch Dunkerque-style battlecruisers in Allied serviceQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:35:47An all-forward battery for the Courageous counterfactualQ&A
- Scharnhorst Class(1936): Most Valued Player of the German Capital Ships - Key Ships Series 7 Ship 444:46Dunkerque pushed Scharnhorst toward a third turretNotable Point
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out2:48:28Dunkerque's unlucky career and the choice of a battleship nameQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:39:30Why all-forward guns suit a modernized battleshipNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:40:38Were the Dunkerques designed mainly against the Deutschlands?Q&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:13:50France's response to a 38 cm-armed ScharnhorstQ&A
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?47:53France answers with fast hunting groupsChapter
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?1:39:04A stronger Free French fleet could change its leadershipNotable Point
- Patreon 89: Everything a Scharnhorst - Germany standardises on one hull for Capital ships & Carriers54:44France accelerates a fast raider-hunting forceChapter
- Future Maritime Strategy: Beyond Cable and Corbett34:46French fast capital ships as an alliance contributionNotable Point
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare37:20Postwar value of the Dunkerque-class battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:42:58Why Dunkerque was a battleship and Alaska a large cruiserQ&A
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 70:53Why the Dunkerques resist simple classificationChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 710:56The Deutschlands turned a cruiser killer into DunkerqueChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 719:10The case for calling Dunkerque a fast battleshipChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 728:42Strasbourg gained protection after Italy escalatedNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 733:05Dunkerque combined 29-knot speed with Atlantic reachNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 734:47All-forward guns shaped Dunkerque's protection and firepowerChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 739:15Promising ships ended as damaged hulks at ToulonChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 744:37The class suited distant presence and crisis responseNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 748:47Anglo-French planning assigned the Dunkerques to raider huntingChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 753:18Wartime duties shifted from Atlantic convoys to deterring ItalyChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 755:35Their usefulness made the Dunkerques dangerous after France fellNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 71:00:38What if the Dunkerques had joined the Allies?Notable Point
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty57:03French redesign versus an Italian Caracciolo programmeChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:16:57Normandie, Lyon, and French design momentumChapter
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty1:46:31France’s need for a credible fast battleshipChapter
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty3:00:28How would later battleships fit a higher treaty baseline?Q&A
- Joffre Class: Too Many Enemies - Key Ship Series 5, Epsiode 532:48Joffre and Dunkerque suggest a raider-hunting task groupNotable Point
- Bruships 122: Patreon Special - how wooden ships between 1700 to 1860 are built2:54:16Four battleships under a 100,000-ton class budgetQ&A
- Battleships of the Treaty Era48:33Dunkerque and France’s parity problemChapter
- Alsace class: France Building Back - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 97:11Gascogne as the bridge to AlsaceChapter
- Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?1:38:28Why France underbuilt cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture4:10:41Capital ships underserved in English-language historyQ&A
- Timberborne: A Test for the Year of Technology/My students favourite 'engineering game'31:17Why a French high-velocity 13-inch gun is not a simple upgradeQ&A
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:20French innovation versus carrier weaknessChapter
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?38:12French naval rank and political weightNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?48:24Treaty tonnage and missed fast carriersNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:06:39Fast carriers, global commitments, and task groupsNotable Point
- Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:17:10An early Joffre and twin-engine carrier aircraftNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:27:00France had yards available for carrier constructionNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?1:39:57Could France pair Dunkerques and carriers?Q&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:21:07A fast French fleet without its air componentChapter
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:30:25Normandie's design and the break to DunkerqueNotable Point
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:45:00French naval competence and government distrust in 1940Notable Point
- German Heavy Cruisers & Cruiser Policy/Procurement of WWII36:07Why Dunkerque could not simply receive 15-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...1:26:51Why a fleet of Dunkerques would have alarmed BritainQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History39:06Treaty persistence and Germany's missing fleet infrastructureChapter
- French Navy Fights on in 1940: Comment Response Video8:24A French battle fleet in the Indian OceanQ&A
- French Navy Fights on in 1940: Comment Response Video58:42Rearming French capital ships and delaying JapanQ&A
- If the French Navy Fought on in 1940: Vive La France10:29French fleet quality and the fast-battleship distinctionChapter
- Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?29:03Dunkerque speed versus four Richelieu-class shipsQ&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1941 & 1942; Response to some Comments9:20Could the French fleet have dispersed to the Far East?Q&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1939 & 1940; Response to some Comments47:06French Dunkirk-type ships with British heavy gunsQ&A
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 19395:45A continuous Dunkerque production alternativeNotable Point
- Major Allied Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 193915:24Dunkerque turret complexity versus fleet numbersNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today20:57Italy versus France in the 1930sQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:52:01Why France chose Dunkerque's gun calibreQ&A
- 1939 Destroyer Doctrine: Patreon 50 (Long Patrol)29:42French destroyers in a Mediterranean speed competitionNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)23:50Smaller battleships for French and Italian fleetsNotable Point
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)25:51Could Britain keep the United States out of the war?Q&A
- Patreon 48: Anglo-Japanese War in Feb 39 - if Tsingtao Incident goes "hot", what's IJN doctrine?1:35:54What would France contribute to the coalition?Q&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:38:29Rearming transferred Dunkerque-class ships for British supplyQ&A
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)1:02:01Dunkerque: forward guns for French strategyChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:24:15Why was Dunkerque not protected against Hood's guns?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:26:07Dunkerque as a compact answer to treaty threatsChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:30:22Dunkerque versus Alaska: speed chooses the fightQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:33:22Were Dunkerque's 13-inch guns enough for modern war?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:35:39Dunkerque's intended advantage over lighter opponentsNotable Point
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:37:11Why place fuel between Dunkerque's boilers and magazines?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:38:30Did Dunkerque and Alaska have very different reload rates?Q&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:38:49Dunkerque's speed and machinery compromiseQ&A
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament1:44:17Was Dunkerque's bunker fuel itself an explosive?Q&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru3:23:33How 16,000-ton 9-inch cruisers could change DunkerqueQ&A
- Favourite Dreadnoughts – Battleships & Battle Cruisers…2:20:28Alaska, Renown and Dunkerque in a three-way comparisonQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:50:34Dunkerque, Littorio, and Richelieu: strategic demands in designChapter
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:55:36Why Dunkerque was not a pocket battleshipQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)2:02:24Why Dunkerque needed range beyond the MediterraneanQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)2:11:50Dunkerque's armour reflected French industrial limitsQ&A
- Chiefs of Staff of the Axis Navies – Comment Response 1/418:43What a first Panzerschiff could teach designersQ&A
- Bruships 56: "Walking Softly & Carrying a Big Stick" - Admirals, Diplomacy & Detterence4:16:32French capital ships as a different Force ZQ&A
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books27:55How Italian rebuilds widened the capital-ship raceQ&A
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-19562:48Italian capital-ship parity under disarmament uncertaintyNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-19563:29Italy studies answers to DunkerqueNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-19566:42Reconstruction trades some combat power for fleet renewalNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (5): Italian Battleships - Conte di Cavour & Duilio Classes 1911-195616:22Rebuilt Cavours support a watchful-waiting strategyNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response39:50Dunkerque's aft aviation space and secondary-battery tradeoffsNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes35:35Why quadruple turrets looked better on paperNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:14:08Concentrated firepower also concentrated riskNotable Point
- Bilgepumps Taranto 80 part 1 of 3: Origins of the Flash in the Dark28:50Taranto's place in Mediterranean force balanceChapter
- Bilgepumps Taranto 80 part 1 of 3: Origins of the Flash in the Dark56:18Cunningham accepts the risk after Ark Royal attacks DunkerqueNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P2a Introduction to Patreon Video 45:54French naval resolve without weakening the army in EuropeNotable Point
- 50th Proper Live Stream - Bru Ships Episode 10: Naval Warfare Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:37:17Why the Dunkerque class remains a battleship designQ&A
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy1:11:02Why Dunkerque and Strasbourg were fast battleshipsQ&A
- An Introduction To Battle Cruisers40:59Dunkerque as a small fast battleshipChapter
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A38:46Warship classes with punishing seakeepingQ&A