Related time notes
- Rise of the Frigate Navies: Why so many nations are going Frigate and why others want them as well!40:08Type 23 outlives its Cold War task-group assumptionsChapter
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:24:01A shared vertical launcher for Sea Dart and Sea WolfQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:36:10Naming the Type 42 and Type 22 combinationQ&A
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:57:48A Type 22-based light air-warfare destroyerQ&A
- Why Can't Modern Russia Build Destroyers?2:23An ageing destroyer force and its refit burdenChapter
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:38:42Could later Type 42 batches arrive before the Falklands?Q&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:57:09Building repeatable carrier and escort groupsNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...51:26Two destroyer tiers and a probable division among frigatesNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:06:21Type 42 added Sea Dart firepower to a larger task groupChapter
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:09:05Nuclear-war forecasts made shallow destroyer magazines look economicalNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:11:54Type 42 picket duty exposed communications and escort problemsNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:17:58Gloucester's Sea Dart and London's Sea Wolf protected a coalition forceNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...1:20:12What could a fleet built around Type 82 and CVA-01 have changed?Notable Point
- Flotilla or Squadron? What Naval Unit is this?20:06An amphibious task group combines combat power with its own sustainmentNotable Point
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)2:03:51Carrier groups pull Type 42 and Type 23 numbers upwardChapter
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)2:14:40Would a modified Type 42 replace a new carrier-defence destroyer?Q&A
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)2:19:33What would escort Canadian Invincibles?Q&A
- What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)2:29:13Would Type 42 and Type 22 start with Batch 3 improvements?Q&A
- Bruships 242: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:05:21Sea Dart as a substitute for ExocetQ&A
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)38:27Heavy radar and the Type 42 stretch show how hull changes spreadNotable Point
- Why the Royal Navy's Type 45s Daring Class Destroyers are what they are & what their future is?10:48The Type 42 replacement clock could not be pausedNotable Point
- How the USN learnt the lessons to conceive the Arleigh Burke class... From the Gearings to the Kidds44:48Spruance and Type 42 solve different escort problemsNotable Point
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:09:262003 cuts to escorts and submarinesChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:11:21The command roles that Type 45s inherited from Type 22 frigatesNotable Point
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?2:46:322021 shipbuilding ambitions and industrial capacityChapter
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:46:18Why a British Aegis equivalent belongs on destroyersQ&A
- Modern Chinese Destroyers: How the Current People's Liberation Army Navy's surface ships came to be1:29:46Type 055 presence and Type 052DL massChapter
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...37:13How Type 42 kept Royal Navy destroyers smallQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order48:54How Type 42 destroyers loaded Sea Dart missilesNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order50:33The uncertain Sea Dart load of Batch 3 Type 42sQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order53:29The proposed Sea Wolf-equipped Batch 4 Type 42Notable Point
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:41:48A British Aegis system in the 1980sQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War2:23:40Why eight Type 82s would not erase the Type 42Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War5:58:21How fourteen Type 82s could affect later destroyer numbersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust2:04:28How successful automatic six-inch guns could reshape the postwar Royal NavyQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust21:00US and Royal Navy missile-age air-defense tradeoffsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust7:53:22How a hypothetical 1984 Sea Dart VLS could change later destroyersQ&A
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age12:55County class combined missiles with cruiser-like presenceChapter
- Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age41:11Why cheaper Type 42 comparisons missed Type 82's wider roleNotable Point
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?28:10From Daring to County - and why Type 42 breaks the lineNotable Point
- The Argentine Navy's Plan of Attack in the 1982 Falklands War13:35Argentina's three-axis attack on the British carrier groupChapter
- The Argentine Navy's Plan of Attack in the 1982 Falklands War33:35Exocet saturation could still put a Type 42 at riskChapter
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:26:15Why British Type 42s lacked antiship missilesQ&A
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:51US frigates and destroyers replace British Falklands escortsQ&A
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)32:41Falklands escorts could not share a common engagement pictureChapter
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:02:14Close-in weapons reduce Falklands task-force lossesQ&A
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:30:22Why Argentine Type 42s carried ExocetQ&A
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:28:38Why the Kidd class outmatched the Type 42 without making it a bad destroyerQ&A
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...1:33:10Cold War destroyers make sense only inside their fleet doctrineQ&A
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...2:19:18Why networks and missiles do not eliminate capital shipsQ&A
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 31:30:13Plan for service beyond the nominal retirement dateNotable Point
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built3:59:44Why anti-ship capability would not change Type 42 employmentQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered56:51A Falklands-informed redesign of the Type 42Q&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:17:45How a larger Daring class enlarges later destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:41:48Why the Falklands 'Type 64' was not a Royal Navy classQ&A
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 630:18How the Neptune programme ran out of momentumChapter
- Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics2:53:48Why a stronger empire would not simply accelerate Type 21 and Type 42Q&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:34:46Why the Type 82 is called a missed Royal Navy opportunityQ&A
- Fourth Rates: When the Fourth is Just Not Enough7:58Peacetime layout and the two-tier cruiser caseNotable Point
- Ticonderoga Class: Comment Response20:56The destroyer that filled an unbuilt cruiser's roleNotable Point
- Slava Class: Comment Response21:34Radar interference and the Type 42 comparisonQ&A
- Slava Class: Comment Response39:25Why a larger Kirov backup was impracticalQ&A
- Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books1:11:26How a Type 22 without anti-ship missiles would be armedQ&A
- Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books2:11:23What would replace hypothetical Type 82 losses in the Falklands?Q&A
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak2:40:38Sea Wolf proposals for the Type 42 destroyersQ&A
- Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build17:20A Type 42 built to Batch 3 dimensions from the startQ&A
- Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain3:31:22Missile Counties could push Type 82 into a cruiser roleQ&A
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Late20:27Radar horizon, Sea Harriers, and carrier positioningNotable Point
- Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...3:09:45Why Type 82 destroyers might replace the Type 42sQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road52:53County-class missile conversions could bridge Britain to later air-defence shipsQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War3:55:19Type 82 destroyers and Malta carriers transform the Falklands WarQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)1:07:52Why Buccaneers could exploit Argentine Type 42 knowledgeQ&A
- Siege of Corfu (1798–1799): 223 yrs ago today10:23What unusual ordnance might HMS Coventry have carried?Q&A
- All Forward Main Guns: Patreon 46 Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles (Long Patrol)1:13:27Modern British warships and the return of distributed weaponsChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament2:21:24Modern warships still separate weapons, machinery, and aviationChapter
- Patreon 46: Nelsons, Dunkerques, Tones and Battles - Good or Bad to Concentrate Main Armament2:25:01What went wrong for Type 42 in the Falklands?Q&A
- Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"2:05:01How Tribal structural ideas returned after the Type 42Q&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered2:36:23The unrealized potential of the Mark 71 eight-inch gunQ&A
- Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 10/11 Why the Battleship Fizzled Out14:44The destroyer as a versatile postwar combatantNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P5 the Royal Navy of the 1980s8:03Destroyer and frigate readiness behind the fleet listChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P5 the Royal Navy of the 1980s31:55Type 42 economy and the split air-defence fleetChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3a/7 Keith Speed (Continued)3:08Layered air defence for Atlantic ASW groupsChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3a/7 Keith Speed (Continued)4:04How 18 Sea Dart ships translated into six availableNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P1/7 Sir Patrick Duffy43:48Close-in weapon warnings precede the Falklands WarNotable Point
- Bruships 34: Random History3:40:50How might Western Cold War fleets better counter the Soviet Navy?Q&A
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:32:46The Type 42's air-defense role on too small a hullQ&A
- Bruships 27: Science Fiction Books1:04:25Reported hull-thickness changes in Royal Navy designsNotable Point
- Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"2:54:34The Type 42 and Type 22 worked as a complementary pairQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 12: New to Me Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:08:42How the Falklands task force tried to create fighter ambushesNotable Point
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…2:13:48From Tribals and Darings to County-class destroyersQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream32:24Escort numbers, crew retention, and deployable readinessChapter