Related time notes
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:45:52When Furious would have been replaced in a larger carrier programmeQ&A
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?17:55Carrier limits force choices between hull numbers and capabilityChapter
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous53:01The 1939 shipbuilding pause and its competing prioritiesChapter
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous58:14How much earlier could the new capital ships have arrived?Notable Point
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous1:11:10Earlier battleships and a different Denmark Strait engagementNotable Point
- Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous1:42:17Would avoiding the pause have brought the Malta carriers closer to completion?Q&A
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class50:1327,000-ton carriers with more room for protection and aircraftChapter
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)31:29Armoured carriers change what attacking aircraft must penetrateNotable Point
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:03:09Later British carriers would follow ImplacableQ&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)2:26:20Would Britain still pursue the larger Implacable design?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)4:05:07Why would Britain continue with the larger Implacable design?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)4:06:15Would Italian light carriers make Britain build light carriers too?Q&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:26:41The panel's favorite aircraft carriersQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:28:30Henderson's larger British carrier design alternativesNotable Point
- How Ship Design is a reflection of Navy's attempts to balance technology, strategy and memory...21:51Treaty limits make carrier designs divergeNotable Point
- Bruships35:41Deutschland-class carrier conversionsQ&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:46:07British carriers in the U.S. Pacific roleQ&A
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:51:18Would early-war oiler shortages restrict British carrier substitutes?Q&A
- What happens if Winston Churchill doesn't pause the Carriers, Fast Battleships & Cruisers in 1939?1:11:58Earlier Implacables could reinforce a fleet built around Force ZNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:54:24Reordering the Royal Navy's 1950s carrier refitsQ&A
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?29:09Larger carriers balance air groups, protection, and survivabilityNotable Point
- What if Force Z(HMS Prince of Wales & HMS Repulse) doesn't get sunk on the 10th of December 1941?31:03Why British carriers need a separate fleet flagshipNotable Point
- What if Winston Churchill doesn't pause Carriers, Capital Ships & Cruisers in 1939? Patreon Live1:34:13Earlier Implacable-class carriers could reinforce the Far Eastern fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:31:25Essex refits and the limits of wartime carrier modernizationQ&A
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...1:10:54The hypothetical six-carrier British forceChapter
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...1:12:17Treaty carrier design and operating theatersNotable Point
- More Lessons of Never Built Carriers17:57An early carrier could have joined scattered British programsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust9:34:23A wartime Royal Navy suddenly equipped with Implacable-class carriersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust9:36:18Why folding wings still have to fit an Implacable's hangarQ&A
- Bruships 220: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:12:46Flawed warship programs that might have workedQ&A
- What would the World's Major Navys look like in 1950 if WWII didn't happen? (Live)39:52Carrier evolution without the wartime building surgeChapter
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:21:41A Royal Navy carrier force at MidwayQ&A
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:53:27A hypothetical 1950 navy built from surplus shipsQ&A
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:50Earlier carriers could support Force Z before their air groups were readyNotable Point
- Admiral Henderson's Dream? A Four Carrier Battle of Taranto...4:23Fleet carriers, strike carriers, and treaty tonnageChapter
- #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?1:46:50A faster battle line would pull carrier construction forwardNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?33:20Treaty tonnage forced carrier armor and air-group compromisesNotable Point
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:26Taiho and the British armoured-carrier sequenceQ&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:57:35Carrier construction as a response to stronger battleshipsNotable Point
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:41:48Why rebuilding the Implacable class could outperform VictoriousQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:44:44How Implacable rebuilds could postpone carrier obsolescenceNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:53:53How early 2,000-horsepower engines would shape carriersQ&A
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!1:10:48Why British armoured carriers needed hangar height as well as areaNotable Point
- An Indomitable Force Z3:21Construction pauses delayed the Royal Navy's carrier programChapter
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:43Implacable would transform a World War I naval campaignQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:56:25German carriers could preserve and accelerate British carriersNotable Point
- Could Seaplanes Tenders have been used in the Battle for the Atlantic? Naval History Live!1:00:18Why larger carrier hangars reduced the need for UnicornNotable Point
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...2:54:49Why Victorious was the costly carrier to reconstructQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/48:39:06Implacable could take an angled deck at prohibitive costQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 71:06:55Graf Zeppelin could accelerate British carrier buildingNotable Point
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast1:01:54Graf Zeppelin against a mature carrier forceNotable Point
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 139:40Armored Ark Royals and multi-carrier operationsChapter
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:01:00The Royal Navy's surviving postwar carrier fleetQ&A
- French Naval Aviation Doctrine & Other potential carrier powers of the 1930s48:16Britain paired carrier and capital-ship procurementNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 5: Some Tremendous Questions & Frustrations!26:20An armoured Ark Royal and its ninety-aircraft groupNotable Point
- Through Deck Cruisers: The Kiev & Invincible Classes of Aircraft Carrier37:01Illustrious and Implacable had different carrier rolesNotable Point
- What do the fleets look like if they achieve full pre-WWII Modernisation? Patreon Premier10:00British carrier construction beyond ImplacableNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt Three: Chatting with Drach, British War Plans and Lots of Carrier Stuff4:27Implacable carrier tonnage source problemQ&A
- War Emergency Carriers of WWII... Lessons for future procurement?6:45Carrier baselines before wartime shortcutsNotable Point
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!0:00HMS Unicorn as more than a carrierChapter
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!18:05Why Unicorn was not a remedy for small armored-carrier air groupsNotable Point
- Why did the Royal Navy need a Forward Aviation Support Ship: Unicorn, the why, the how & the value!43:18A proposed sister ship becomes a command-support carrierNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:00Implacable's uncertain design recordChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 35:52The Royal Navy's dream carrier balanceNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 38:35A delayed carrier force and Force ZNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 312:38Why distant stations demanded survivable carriersNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 317:09Second London Naval Treaty limits and escape routesChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 326:28Implacable versus Illustrious capacityNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 329:43The 23,450-ton displacement paradoxChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 335:30Reconstructing a 27,000-ton carrier from a broken treaty recordNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 347:37Armament, endurance, and wartime growth marginsChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 355:15Construction delays and the Royal Navy's aviation-fuel safeguardsNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:00:15Armored hangars protected skilled people as well as aircraftNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:03:39Large air groups inside low armored hangarsChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:10:03Strike-heavy air groups against TirpitzChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:17:47Implacable's 81-aircraft Pacific groupChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:18:39Deck parking, northern weather, and combat readinessNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:21:22Implacable's Pacific sorties and Operation OlympicChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:23:00Indefatigable and Britain's final air combat of World War IINotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:26:49Carriers as postwar transports and repatriation shipsChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:28:03The missed modernization choiceNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:32:28The postwar economy behind fleet contractionNotable Point
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:36:37Speed-build choices and the final 27,000-ton reconstructionChapter
- The Royal Navy's Interwar Dream... The Implacable Class: Key Ships Series 9, Ship 31:43:42What if carrier construction had continued without the pause?Notable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines20:57Implacable class and the Royal Navy compromiseChapter
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines23:23Implacable's armor, speed, and 81-aircraft capacityNotable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines25:31Treaty-free carrier size and growing aircraftNotable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines34:26How Implacable missed a possible 1942 service dateNotable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines41:06Implacable's beacons and floats for night recoveryNotable Point
- Carriers of the Planned War Fleets: How Shokaku, Implacables & Essexs reflect their Navys Doctrines41:53Implacable's anti-aircraft batteries and uncertain countsNotable Point
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...3:04:02British armored carriers and the reuse of design studiesNotable Point
- Bruships 154: Ship-Shape's Scandi Ship 2024... answering naval history questions...5:18:13Why unrestricted British carriers might resemble ImplacableQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:31:57Royal Navy development if war begins in 1941Q&A
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:03:03British carriers sustain combat air patrol near enemy airfieldsNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion1:28:09An early treaty collapse could permit a larger British carrierNotable Point
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:32:44Implacable versus Akagi in a night surface actionQ&A
- Striking First: The Development of US Carrier Naval Aviation Doctrine by War Gaming & Fleet Problems1:04:23Treaty limits collide with large-carrier doctrineNotable Point
- Bruships 147: Naval History Questions & Book Boxes Getting Packed3:34:38Ark Royal's treaty compromises and an Implacable alternativeQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered19:09Could Implacable replace the costly Victorious rebuild?Q&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:20:53Carrier parity under a different Washington treatyQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!4:04:35Why wartime Britain would move beyond ImplacableQ&A
- Check Campaign 5: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:08:22Would taller hangars improve British armored carriers?Q&A
- Patreon 92: Frank Whittle is given consistent funding by Britain to develop jet engines from 19281:48:20Carrier machinery savings become hangar and aviation capacityChapter
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response45:18British carrier roles joined combat doctrine to global repair logisticsChapter
- British Response to Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response0:27Graf Zeppelin could keep British carrier construction movingQ&A
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response30:29How Graf Zeppelin could accelerate British carrier constructionQ&A
- Operation Berlin (Atlantic) – a Failure of Both Sides?3:06:33How did British capital-ship construction delays affect the raid?Q&A
- What Happens if 1930s Germany Standardises on the Scharnhorst hull for Capital Ships & Carriers?55:50British shipyard capacity accelerates the responseChapter
- Patreon 89: Everything a Scharnhorst - Germany standardises on one hull for Capital ships & Carriers1:18:02Would Britain rush light carriers into production?Q&A
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?2:36:23Would the Far East require more Ark Royal-type carriers?Q&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty1:17:51Carrier aviation under a different treaty balanceChapter
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series18:40Where two Implacable-class carriers might have servedQ&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:07:10The design route to ten more useful ImplacablesQ&A
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:30:45Why Victorious was rebuilt before ImplacableQ&A
- Bruships 116: Australia Trip Books... Continued4:25:04Essex and Implacable: construction timing and air groupsNotable Point
- HMS Ark Royal(1937): Key Ships Series 3, Ship 958:34The inquiry's lessons for carrier survivabilityNotable Point
- HMS Illustrious: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 71:31:04Why Vian chose Indefatigable as his flagshipNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History56:56Why Victorious led the carrier modernization programmeQ&A
- Alternate History - Royal Navy retains the Fleet 'units' of Royal Naval Air Service: Patreon 762:00:48How closely would the new fleet carrier resemble Implacable?Q&A
- Bruships 108: PLanned for Random Books off the Shelf & Chat1:01:45A reconstructed Implacable class after 1945Q&A
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...1:03:30Victorious was meant to teach the Implacable refitsQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...2:11:06Modernized Implacables would cover the Atlantic and Far EastQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video1:20:40Why low hangars constrained later British armored carriersQ&A
- Bruships 87: Books Found on My Travels, New Books & Christmas Recomendations2:22:30The strategic cost of selling Argentina an ImplacableQ&A
- Bruships 86: Science Fiction Strikes Some More3:25:53Avoiding a carrier pause compounds shipyard outputQ&A
- Five Weaknesses of Allied/Axis/Minor Navies in 1941 & 1942; Response to some Comments44:24Why capital-ship losses accelerated the Implacable classQ&A
- Patreon 61: Selborne-Fisher Scheme: Integration & De-Integration of Executive & Engineering Branches26:16Which carrier generation did the thought experiment mean?Q&A
- Major Axis Navies: Five Problems & How to Fix them in January 193942:46Illustrious, Ark Royal, and Implacable carrier conceptsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)40:16Carrier design follows theater and strike doctrineChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)1:16:59Treaty tonnage, not indifference, constrained British carriersNotable Point
- Patreon 55: History of Survey Ships in the Royal Navy1:29:32Building a balanced twenty-ship historical strike forceQ&A
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature2:53Why Implacables would yield to Audacious and Malta carriersQ&A
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Aircraft Carriers (Long Patrol)35:29Why 27,000 tons changed the carrier trade-offNotable Point
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:14:40Redesigning British armored carriers with hindsightQ&A
- Bruships 60: Covid Jab, Bad Back & New Books12:01Victorious and a four-carrier modernisation programmeNotable Point
- Patreon 34: Inter-war Naval Aircraft Development - what could have been?3:54:20How many aircraft might a rebuilt Implacable have carried?Q&A
- Churchill's Iniatives (WWII); Long patrol p2/3 - Force Z16:56Implacable-class delays and lost momentumNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (16): Carrier, A Century of First-Hand Accounts of Naval Operations...20:43How extra treaty tonnage points toward ImplacableNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response41:15G3 design lessons and carrier-conversion potentialNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 7: Conclusion13:17Armored carriers answered British repair and shipyard limitsNotable Point
- Top 10 Ships – not Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town classes…53:24Indefatigable and Unicorn among wartime carrier favouritesQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie3:09Where were the planned British strike carriers?Q&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie4:17Why Implacable stayed close to existing designsQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers the Debate - Dr Alex Clarke vs Armoured Carrier's Jamie10:50Could Henderson have accelerated carrier construction?Q&A
- Special Episode: Design, Design, Design!42:57Prewar studies become wartime carrier designsChapter