Q&A · 3:14:40-3:15:59

Redesigning British armored carriers with hindsight

The best hindsight redesign would retain armored protection while building larger ships continuously instead of interrupting the program.

Question

How would you redesign Britain's armored aircraft carriers with hindsight, and how credible were predictions of heavy losses during an invasion of Japan?

Short answer

Keep the armored concept, enlarge the ships toward Implacable or Indefatigable dimensions, and maintain continuous construction. American expectations of severe carrier losses helped motivate the larger Midway class.

Notes

The projected kamikaze environment made flight-deck survivability central to late-war planning. An American prediction held that British armored carriers might be the only carriers still operational within days of an invasion, while American designs were less able to absorb repeated impacts. A better program would avoid the historical interruption associated with Churchill and begin with a larger hull. That approach would preserve the armored deck's resilience while improving aircraft capacity and sustaining production experience.