Related time notes
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?14:13Stored Courageous turrets show Britain's measured rearmament paceNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?44:02A 1918 reconstruction could keep Tiger useful while new designs took shapeChapter
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:59:24Rethinking the Courageous-class carrier conversionsQ&A
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live45:01Could Fisher's large light cruisers have become carriers?Chapter
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live50:03Why 9.2-inch guns suited Fisher's Baltic ships betterNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live1:07:56Two plausible paths to a Wilhelmshaven carrier strikeChapter
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live1:25:28Gun delays and engines behind the proposed 1916 carriersNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live1:25:28Purpose-built carriers enable a two-wave attackChapter
- What if the Royal Navy carried out a carrier strike against Wilhelmshaven in WWI? Patreon Live2:13:08How carriers and battleships evolve without treaty limitsQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:54:25Carrier choices after losing the Courageous classQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:50:08Converting Courageous and Glorious along Eagle's linesQ&A
- Sir Eustace Tennyson d'Eyncourt: WWI Royal Navy's Director of Naval Construction1:09:21Why large light cruiser hulls constrained carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Battle of Jutland: The Strategic Leadership which both defined it and denied it satisfaction14:34Fisher kept choosing speed and guns over protectionNotable Point
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:09Trading Courageous and Glorious for a third RenownQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued33:22British First World War designs judged mistakenQ&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:24Why the Courageous conversions were a tolerable treaty outcomeQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:03:53Why three smaller carriers could beat two larger onesQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:08:06Converting the Admirals or the Courageous classQ&A
- Fifth Rate: A Price Point Which Matters... Key Ship Series 9 - Ship 1024:17Modern analogies for heavy frigates and razéesNotable Point
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?1:32:49Warship efficiency depends on what the ship achieved for its costQ&A
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'1:05:15Tiger Cubs displace Fisher's large light cruisersChapter
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...12:31Restoring the station-cruiser roleChapter
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...48:55Why the Courageous class may never be neededNotable Point
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!3:26:08The Royal Navy's older carriers in a 1942 warQ&A
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!1:48:31Carrier fuel systems evolved through repeated upgradesQ&A
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers0:38Fisher turns the Courageous class into carriersChapter
- Fisher's Furious Flying off Ships: Courageous Class built as Aircraft Carriers12:24A fast carrier with a large strike air groupChapter
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:44:32Full-length flight decks for Courageous, Glorious, and FuriousQ&A
- Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist51:25Building the Courageous class as carriers from the outsetChapter
- Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist54:34Would carrier work-up delay the Courageous class beyond 1916?Q&A
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built4:47:46Why Fisher wanted evocative warship namesQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:07:19Courageous cannot be enlarged into a 35,000-ton carrierQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:42:38Courageous was a Baltic large light cruiser, not a normal battlecruiserQ&A
- Bruships 143: Some Book Tales and Naval History Questions Answered3:51:48Nine 9.2-inch guns turn Courageous into a heavy cruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books49:54How small-tube boilers could transform the Revenge classQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:59:17How 9.2-inch Courageous-class cruisers reshape WashingtonQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:31:43Why World War One did not invalidate every armored cruiserQ&A
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...28:55Why three carriers protect operational availabilityNotable Point
- The HMS Ark Royals Saga: A History of Naval Aviation in a Name...34:00Carrier damage control and the loss of Ark RoyalChapter
- Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s1:28:58Helicopters reorder carrier fleets and escort forcesChapter
- Naval History Writing Competition 2023/202416:56How Admiral-class carriers would reshape treaty tonnageNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:09:49Battlecruiser conversions concentrate treaty tonnageChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō15:14Why the Royal Navy rejected very small carriersNotable Point
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books18:49Why nobody wanted Courageous and Glorious as gunshipsQ&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:12:21Would larger Courageous-class ships become carriers?Q&A
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:19:35What Britain converts if the Courageous class stays armedQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:33:43Would triple turrets make Courageous more useful?Q&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:35:47An all-forward battery for the Courageous counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:30:53The Royal Navy's least successful wartime ship designsQ&A
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...30:54Hermes, not Eagle, was Britain's purpose-built carrierQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out46:049.2-inch Courageous-class cruisers reshape treaty fleetsQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out50:14Lion and Princess Royal as carrier conversionsQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out55:59Lion offered better underwater protection than CourageousQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy22:30Where Fisher's large light cruisers fitQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:42:33Why purpose-built Courageous-sized carriers would be betterQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases4:14:38Courageous had the guns, but Renown was the ship Britain neededQ&A
- Battle Cruisers and Battleships are Separate Categories in the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty1:17:51Carrier aviation under a different treaty balanceChapter
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:26:24A true Courageous-class light cruiser would carry 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 612:12Wartime cruiser lines and Neptune's design ancestryChapter
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:07:22Could Courageous-class hulls have carried 9.2-inch guns?Q&A
- Ersatz Yorck Class: Trying to Be All Things - Key Ships Series 4, Episode 31:10Fisher, Churchill, and wartime construction powerNotable Point
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:18:50Why more machine guns add little to CourageousQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!1:19:28Why widening Courageous means rebuilding the shipQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!2:07:54Why an unfinished Admiral makes a better carrier conversionQ&A
- Bruships 121: Questions till the Bru Runs Out!3:18:49Retained 15-inch guns make Courageous a raider threatQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?2:05:17How the large light cruisers became carrier experimentsNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?2:54:02When 'better not built' still requires a replacementQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done1:54:29How Caracciolo could alter British carrier conversionsNotable Point
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response24:23Why the Royal Navy tested the six-gun arrangementQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response56:30What the third turret gave Renown's gunnersQ&A
- Queen Elizabeth Class: Brave 1st step/faltering leap/something else? & Patreon 73 Comment Response1:38:29What Furious reveals about the origin of the 18-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat1:19:35Courageous and Glorious as 15-inch cruiser huntersQ&A
- Nelson (1925)Class: The Story of Britain's Washington Treaty Battleships1:51Why Jutland did not end the battlecruiserChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 44:37Why the Courageous class did not improve on RenownQ&A
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 651:34:11Were lower flying-off decks like hangar catapults?Q&A
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 651:34:58Did Courageous and Glorious receive continuous flight decks?Q&A
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 651:55:54Who wins: two Lexingtons or three Courageous-class carriers?Q&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War2:23:35Lexingtons were the best conversions, but arrived slowlyQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War2:32:53Smaller Courageous conversions bought more flight decksQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video56:15An Admiral-class carrier conversion counterfactualQ&A
- Bruships 88: Way of War1:16:14Which hulls replace the large light-cruiser carriers?Q&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)28:18What Admiral-class carrier conversions mean for Courageous and GloriousQ&A
- Equitable Naval Treaties Discussion (Live)1:08:29Recasting the Courageous class as proto-super cruisersQ&A
- County Cruisers P8: The County Class in War and Retrospect (Long Patrol)5:34Alaska and the heavy cruiser that treaties preventedNotable Point
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books1:26:04A Renown-derived alternative to Courageous, Glorious, and FuriousQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru11:55What happens to Courageous and Glorious if the Admirals become carriersQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:05:32How surviving carriers could strengthen the Far East FleetQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (10)3:55:28How surviving early carriers could reshape 1941Q&A
- Quirky Classes and What they tell us about their navies… (Live)58:31Why HMS Furious carried fewer aircraft than Courageous and GloriousQ&A
- Bruships 65: Naval History Books & Questions Answered27:19A 9.2-inch cruiser for the Great LakesQ&A
- Patreon 39:What if Courageous and Glorious had survived?23:07The converted carriers in figuresNotable Point
- Patreon 39:What if Courageous and Glorious had survived?26:56The original gunship against a Deutschland-class raiderQ&A
- Bruships 63: The Writing Theorists - Corbett & Mahan, Richmond & Simms, Cable & Gorshkhov4:19:30Would converting the G3 hulls have made better carriers?Q&A
- Patreon 36: Repair Ships, Depot Ships, Tenders and Stores Ships...2:08:08Could the Courageous class have become aircraft repair ships?Q&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat2:16:49What happens to the Courageous hulls if the Admirals become carriersQ&A
- Dreadnoughts (Commissioned Ships 1905-55)1:35:39Why carrier conversion suited the Courageous classQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19155:29Renown and Courageous as competing wartime choicesNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 7: Conclusion22:16What flawed first-generation carriers still taught naviesNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 7: Conclusion23:13An Admiral-class alternative to the Courageous conversionsNotable Point
- Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s Long Patrol Part 6: 1930s Aircraft Carriers of the Big 32:47HMS Glorious and the cost of risking fleet carriersChapter
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy7:29Where the large light cruisers fitQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A30:15Courageous was officially a large light cruiserQ&A
- Special Episode: Design, Design, Design!47:06Why losing Courageous and Glorious did not erase the carrier planQ&A