Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

F3 Battlecruiser

Also searchable as F3 Battlecruisers.

Related time notes

  1. Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:38:06Choosing an unbuilt warship with maintenance providedQ&A
  2. What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?
    38:41Armour and subdivision in fast battleships and battlecruisersNotable Point
  3. Churchill's Good ideas: the actually good, the bad, and the ridiculous
    1:31:36F3 battlecruisers and the cancelled American capital shipsQ&A
  4. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    42:45Treaty battlecruisers grow into fast battleshipsQ&A
  5. Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:02:06Unbuilt ships and the drawing-board restrictionQ&A
  6. Bruships 247: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    26:34Why favour the F3 battlecruiser design?Q&A
  7. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    24:50Frederick Field links design policy to worldwide force projectionChapter
  8. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    54:24Treaty tonnage could produce three or four F3-style capital shipsChapter
  9. What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?
    57:12Tiger could test a 15-inch/50 before the F2 and F3 shipsNotable Point
  10. Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    41:44F3 battlecruiser protection tradeoffsQ&A
  11. Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:34:22Replacing Renown after a 1927 machinery fireQ&A
  12. Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans
    1:28:08Trading Hood for an F3 battlecruiser programQ&A
  13. Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans
    1:33:36F3s, a common 15-inch gun, and continuous yard workNotable Point
  14. Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans
    1:57:19Why Hood's armor belt was not F3 protectionNotable Point
  15. Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:41:24US battleships standardized on triple 14-inch turretsQ&A
  16. Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:35:14British gun standardization and destroyer sizeQ&A
  17. What if the Royal Navy's Aircraft Carrier HMS Hermes had sisters in the 1920s? (Patreon Live)
    32:37Beatty's interwar procurement prioritiesNotable Point
  18. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…
    3:41:37Testing an F3-inspired alternative to King George VChapter
  19. Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust
    58:18How different Washington Treaty retentions reshape the Royal NavyQ&A
  20. Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress
    5:57:41Forward gunfire and the Nelson turret arrangementNotable Point
  21. Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?
    41:03The modified F3 as a treaty battlecruiserChapter
  22. Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?
    47:24Visualizing a late-1920s F3 developmentNotable Point
  23. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    50:37Should Britain have chosen F3 instead of Nelson and Rodney?Q&A
  24. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    53:23An early replacement bargain could have produced four F3sNotable Point
  25. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    58:16F3's forward battery and speed change two German encountersNotable Point
  26. #2Historians Special: @Drachinifel comes to chat Dreadnoughts that Almost were P2 of ?
    2:00:10More North Carolinas offered a quick American responseQ&A
  27. Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    5:16:38A faster four-shaft Nelson designQ&A
  28. Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:38:39From the F3 concept to Vanguard's battlecruiser lineageQ&A
  29. Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:05:57Could Nelson and Rodney be redesigned for 28 knots?Q&A
  30. Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:19:04If HMS Lion exploded at JutlandQ&A
  31. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!
    1:10:38Canadian Queen Elizabeths and the case for F3Q&A
  32. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!
    1:54:52F3 and 15-inch King George V alternativesQ&A
  33. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    16:33F3 versus G3 for Royal Navy serviceQ&A
  34. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    20:57Why F3's dockyard and ammunition needs matter against G3Q&A
  35. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    35:47F3 and the timing of the Washington Naval TreatyNotable Point
  36. Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...
    37:24A 35,000-ton British battlecruiserQ&A
  37. Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:19:13A faster Nelson with 15-inch gunsQ&A
  38. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    50:58British World of Warships lines have exhausted the obvious historical categoriesQ&A
  39. Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?
    2:54:30Battleship mass production meant a run of eight to ten shipsQ&A
  40. Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/4
    3:39:46Building a British F3-style battlecruiserChapter
  41. Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax
    5:05:30A failed London treaty could revive the F3 battlecruiser conceptQ&A
  42. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    10:40A Royal Navy 15-inch/50 upgrade programQ&A
  43. Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!
    59:46An F3-style heavy cruiser makes the carrier trade harderQ&A
  44. Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!
    1:53:02A 1916 F3 design accelerates the Admiral classQ&A
  45. Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote
    2:25:31Reworking K3 into an all-forward F3 layoutQ&A
  46. The Royal Navy's Forgotten Lost Battleship Generation: Key Ship Series 8 - Ships 6
    0:00The treaty uncertainty behind a forgotten battleship generationChapter
  47. Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?
    2:05:23A 15-inch/50 alternative to Nelson's 16-inch batteryNotable Point
  48. HMS Revenge(1915): the Reliable Pikeman of the Royal Navys Battle Line!
    32:20Gun caliber, barrel pools, and fleet logisticsNotable Point
  49. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    1:20:13How an F3 layout could produce a faster NelsonQ&A
  50. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    1:47:59A 45,000-ton F3-style Nelson classQ&A
  51. Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time
    3:08:36An F3 layout creates a recognizable British capital-ship familyQ&A
  52. Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books
    19:23If every treaty navy received two new battleshipsQ&A
  53. The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies
    23:11British interwar research tests automated heavy gunsChapter
  54. Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    2:48:51Choosing F3 for wider 15-inch fleet improvementsQ&A
  55. Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response
    48:06An F3 and 15-inch/50 path reshapes the interwar fleetNotable Point
  56. Patreon 89: Everything a Scharnhorst - Germany standardises on one hull for Capital ships & Carriers
    6:54Why F3 is a better carrier basis than NelsonQ&A
  57. Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits
    41:15Could battlecruisers replace the battleship benchmark?Notable Point
  58. HMS Incomparable: When Jackie Fisher Dreamed to Big - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 8
    3:34F3 and the 15-inch alternative to all-forward turretsNotable Point
  59. Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties
    1:14:54The F3 option and a 15-inch gun development pathChapter
  60. Mistakes & Missed Opportunities of the Washington Naval Treaties
    1:17:30F3 gun modernization and deterrent effectsNotable Point
  61. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    2:51:04F3 speed and protection within the treaty limitChapter
  62. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    2:53:25How F3 guns could have changed British battleship refitsNotable Point
  63. Patreon 82: WNT Nations during 1920s/30s, what was their biggest mistake & missed opportunity?
    3:09:57Why faster capital ships mattered to Force HNotable Point
  64. Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy
    31:54An F3 battlecruiser could pull older ships toward a common gunQ&A
  65. Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy
    1:00:34Why longer naval guns depend on better metallurgyQ&A
  66. A 13.5in gun Dreadnought? Would it work?
    54:12Reworking G3 and F3 capital-ship ideasChapter
  67. Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History
    3:17:05The F3 design and an all-15-inch Royal Navy battlefleetQ&A
  68. Bruships 99: Political History, Geostrategic History & Naval History
    3:22:48Why a twelve-gun 15-inch Nelson was not the likely alternativeQ&A
  69. Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat
    2:00:07F3 battlecruisers change the Bismarck chaseQ&A
  70. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    43:36How difficult would a 16-inch F3 conversion be?Q&A
  71. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    47:55Beatty's support for the F2 and F3 alternativesNotable Point
  72. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    57:05Why an unrestricted navy would not build the F3Q&A
  73. Nelson Class & Patreon 67 Comment Response
    1:02:42The German design problem posed by a 29-knot F3Notable Point
  74. Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"
    3:22:54Anti-aircraft armament for a 28,000-ton fast battlecruiserQ&A
  75. Patreon 43: "Unverified stories of Norwegian Campaign: Tall Tales of Tribals"
    2:41:59Nelson-class design and the Royal Navy's distributed fleet doctrineQ&A