Hood cannot be considered as well protected as the F3 design. Her armor belt was long and comparatively shallow, whereas F3 belonged to a design line explicitly described as fully armored. Tiger provides another comparison because denser subdivision helps explain her displacement and resilience relative to Renown and Repulse. Two ships can both list a 12-inch belt while protecting very different areas and placing different internal structures behind it. Belt thickness alone cannot establish equivalent protection or settle whether a design is a fast battleship or a battlecruiser. Protected area, internal armor, and subdivision must be read with the headline thickness. A hypothetical 15-inch-gunned Tiger is judged decisively stronger than Renown or Repulse in a fight.
Notable Point ยท 1:57:19-2:00:24
Why Hood's armor belt was not F3 protection
A Hood-versus-F3 comparison explains why nominal belt thickness cannot substitute for belt depth, protected area, internal armor, and subdivision.