Q&A · 6:54-8:13

Why F3 is a better carrier basis than Nelson

The Nelson and Rodney hull is too slow for a fleet carrier, while the unbuilt 29-knot F3 battlecruiser offers a more plausible British common-hull starting point.

Question

Could the Royal Navy base every carrier and battleship on a modified Nelson or Rodney hull?

Short answer

Not effectively, because the Nelson design is too slow; the 29-knot F3 battlecruiser would be the more plausible common-hull basis.

Notes

A common carrier and capital-ship hull still has to meet the carrier's speed requirement. Nelson and Rodney are too slow to provide that basis without a major redesign. The unbuilt F3 battlecruiser offers a better alternative because it was intended to make about 29 knots. That speed does not prove a complete common-hull program would work, but it makes F3 a more credible starting point for the audience's British version of the scenario.