Related time notes
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:07A hypothetical CATOBAR Queen Elizabeth air groupQ&A
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:08:13Carrier aircraft after a hypothetical loss of US supplyNotable Point
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:09Electrical capacity is only part of an EMALS conversionNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?25:18V/STOL aircraft and catapult airframe loadsNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?1:23:42The infrastructure cost of CATOBAR independenceChapter
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:55:42British carrier studies approached Ford-class scaleQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:29:57A maximal post-Falklands Royal NavyQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:45:57Why a 161,000-ton Queen Elizabeth carrier needs a missionQ&A
- Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:47:03Would a giant carrier let aircraft take off like a land runway?Q&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:47:10Project Ark Royal and CATOBAR optionsQ&A
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:31:10Catapult reinforcement and vertical-landing limits on F-35BQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:49:38The Bazán SAC-220 CATOBAR carrierQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:53Navalized Typhoon and a CATOBAR Queen Elizabeth classQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start18:36How building CVA-01 would change Britain's next carrier generationQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start36:21Why CATOBAR can be the best mechanism but the wrong fleet fitQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:10:43The unresolved choice after the F-35BQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:29An enlarged Queen Elizabeth carrier and a naval aircraft variantNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War2:24:02The interservice cost of CATOBAR Queen Elizabeth carriersQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War5:51:09Why a navy might pair CATOBAR and STOVL carriersQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 5 of 9 - Royal Navy & Royal Marines Charity, The Royal Navy Benevolent Trust6:06:07The larger catapult Queen Elizabeth drawing was France's PA2Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II6:11:14The narrow export market for China's J-35Q&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:35:01A licensed Hawkeye still needs a CATOBAR carrierQ&A
- Izumo Class; Building for the future or planned preperation?38:53F-35B interoperability versus CATOBAR performanceNotable Point
- Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:09:57Early CATOBAR concepts for the Queen Elizabeth classQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:05Why a British CATOBAR fleet would not adopt the F-14Q&A
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?3:03:39Why Britain chose STOVL instead of catapultsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?52:01A late CATOBAR conversion cannot cheaply undo force-structure choicesNotable Point
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:21:57Why CATOBAR dominates carrier debatesQ&A
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:22:42A hull insert could support a Queen Elizabeth-class CATOBAR conversionNotable Point
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:34:29Carrier drones should match the Queen Elizabeth class's aviation systemQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...11:31What a Queen Elizabeth-class CATOBAR conversion would entailNotable Point
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...38:59Why light carriers could operate Skyhawks and Harriers but not Super ÉtendardsQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...45:27Why France retained CATOBAR carriers when Britain did notQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:06Why Royal Navy helicopter AEW emerged after the FalklandsQ&A
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:03:30CATOBAR conversion would trade commonality for a new gapNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:07:34Hawkeye and Wedgetail in British carrier fundingNotable Point
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...19:23Why a Sea Typhoon needed a new airframeQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:22:30What a modern Spanish CATOBAR carrier would changeQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:47:17Queen Elizabeth carriers if the F-35B failedQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:50:13Why Harrier could not cover a forty-year carrier lifeNotable Point
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...8:02Why a 1960s Royal Navy light carrier would use CATOBARQ&A
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:17:19How a navy could regenerate carrier air power in World War IIIQ&A
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:18:54Could smaller American CATOBAR carriers replace wartime losses?Q&A
- Bruships 183: Science Fiction/Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:21:41F-35 variant choice and competing British aviation programsNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:00:06Can STOBAR provide a route to CATOBAR?Notable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:16Turkey, Iran, and possible new carrier operatorsQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:02:34Italy's carrier choice and shared aircraft for Cavour and TriesteNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:04:35Italy's next carrier: size, aircraft, and political fundingNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:08:26Why STOBAR restricts payload and rangeQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II2:45:52Why Britain did not build nuclear CATOBAR carriersQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II2:50:55Why EMALS cannot be cheaply retrofitted to Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...6:56Why a one-carrier fleet loses availabilityQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:00:27A Spanish light CATOBAR carrier could reshape export fleetsNotable Point
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:22:58A Sea Typhoon would require a new carrier-strength airframeQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:56:53The P.1154 catapult-and-vertical-recovery compromiseQ&A
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Operation & Learning From Experience! Part 3 or 1 of 352:40China's carriers connect island defense with distant sea lanesChapter
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Operation & Learning From Experience! Part 3 or 1 of 357:47China's sea lanes and the case for carrier power projectionNotable Point
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Operation & Learning From Experience! Part 3 or 1 of 31:12:31France's PANG and the price of strategic autonomyChapter
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Operation & Learning From Experience! Part 3 or 1 of 31:19:42Choose the carrier that fits the national missionChapter
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20242:28:24Why an angled-deck LHD becomes a compromised carrier and assault shipQ&A
- So, You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier? Infrastructure & Industry, the Realities of Construction!1:19:10Shore air bases sustain carrier aircraft and retain their crewsChapter
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:31:12Sea Harrier radar and the Falklands early-warning gapQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...1:33:38How much range the F-35C gains over the F-35BNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...18:01Why Britain chose the F-35B and STOVL carriersChapter
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...35:05Crowsnest, Hawkeye, and the 70-80 percent solutionNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...52:49The 2010 CATOBAR reversal and carrier-strike gapChapter
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:54:02V/STOL offers the fastest emergency route back to seaQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/48:01:59CATOBAR remained preferable while Britain could sustain itQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 752:48When a Queen Elizabeth conversion should become full CATOBARNotable Point
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 754:56Procurement politics can determine the carrier a navy getsNotable Point
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!2:05:01Ark Royal completes Task Force Malta's carrier trioQ&A
- The Lessons of Never Built Carriers30:03CATOBAR, STOVL, and STOBAR tradeoffsChapter
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:10:36Building Queen Elizabeth-class carriers for catapult aircraft from the outsetQ&A
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!25:48The cost of a one-off domestic carrier and the lost PA2Chapter
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!37:00Nuclear-carrier prestige versus usable national powerNotable Point
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!54:57CATOBAR operations, Hawkeye, and US interoperabilityChapter
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!1:02:26PA2 and the cost of converting a carrier to CATOBARChapter
- Soviet Naval Aviation Doctrine: Always Wrestling the Same Demons1:20:08STOVL, STOBAR, and the Soviet carrier trade-offNotable Point
- The Current Carrier Generation: War is over/War has yet to begin1:03:30CATOBAR, STOBAR, and STOVL as mission choicesChapter
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!52:35Why unlike carrier designs can all be good valueQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:37:45Carrier aviation in a stronger post-imperial CommonwealthQ&A
- Drones & The Future of the Carrier Air Group - Patreon Premier30:53China's STOBAR-to-CATOBAR drone design problemChapter
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...22:37Carrier choices for medium powersChapter
- Super Carriers & Specialists: The Aircraft Carrier Debate from WWII to present...27:59CATOBAR is powerful, but no longer the global defaultNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more34:49A common V/STOL flight-deck fleet for BritainNotable Point
- Suggest Series Name Please: Comment Response video with a twist49:36Queen Elizabeth carriers: operational adequacy and deterrent valueNotable Point
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built2:32:58Why nuclear Queen Elizabeth carriers would become CATOBAR shipsQ&A
- Check Campaign 9: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:02:29Runway aircraft do not become carrier aircraft by relocationNotable Point
- 809 Squadron Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm: The Immortals58:17Carrier aircraft cannot be improvised in a crisisNotable Point
- Patreon 94: The different types of Aircraft Carriers/Seaplane Carriers/Hybrids1:51:48CATOBAR versus STOVL depends on the whole fleetChapter
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response1:00:49Could conventional carriers work in the North Atlantic and Baltic?Q&A
- Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series43:08Why an F-35B is not a quick CATOBAR conversionQ&A
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy3:00:18Why Britain favored STOVL carrier commonalityQ&A
- Kara Class: Comment Response14:11Why the Yak-38 faced a harder problem than a conventional carrier aircraftQ&A
- Nuclear Power: Not All About Rickover12:07Nuclear carrier costs and air-wing optionsNotable Point
- Soviet Navy 1918-19914:39:04Kuznetsov's problems are linked to its builders despite earlier carrier experienceNotable Point
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books3:15:13Why British CATOBAR carriers would probably use F-18sQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today32:02Why three CATOBAR carriers can be easier to sustain than twoNotable Point
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack51:33Why CATOBAR conversion remained difficultQ&A
- Naval History Questions: Live From The Brushack1:00:18Why waste-heat steam is poor for carrier catapultsQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...1:59:40The fleet built around retained CATOBAR carriersQ&A
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment3:38:09Converting Queen Elizabeth carriers to catapultsQ&A
- Bruships 68: Random Naval History Books & Questions3:35:55Why a major navy would standardize on CATOBARQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...3:35:19Why the United States did not welcome Britain's CATOBAR retreatQ&A
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...2:04:02Why converting Queen Elizabeth-class carriers to catapults is technically possible but unattractiveQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:28:53Why CATOBAR conversion would not suit Queen ElizabethQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:12:11CATOBAR versus STOVL depends on the whole fleetQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 13: Weapons, Both Personal & Ship, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:26:37Why steam catapults did not fit the Queen Elizabeth designNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 12: New to Me Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:07:40A CATOBAR Queen Elizabeth class for the U.S. NavyQ&A
- Patreon Video 2: Royal Navy Operations in the Indian Ocean 1941-431:30:32Carrier takeoffs and landings consume an aircraft's structural lifeNotable Point
- Patreon Video 2: Royal Navy Operations in the Indian Ocean 1941-431:31:44Why converting the Queen Elizabeth class to CATOBAR would be difficultQ&A
- Patreon Video 2: Royal Navy Operations in the Indian Ocean 1941-431:34:24STOVL decks trade aircraft performance for wider fleet availabilityQ&A
- 50th Live Special: What, Why & How of Armed Forces…29:42A case for sustained tenure in critical ministriesNotable Point