Related time notes
- Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans1:28:08Trading Hood for an F3 battlecruiser programQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II7:23:13Why semi-dreadnoughts survived into the dreadnought transitionQ&A
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?41:03The modified F3 as a treaty battlecruiserChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?47:24Visualizing a late-1920s F3 developmentNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?1:05:21Japan's three new fast battleshipsChapter
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?1:10:09British capital designs evolve by building batchNotable Point
- Flagships for the Dominions; What if the 1922 Washington Naval Treaty gives the Dominions Flagships?1:13:16France must answer Italian fast capital shipsNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/44:18:44Renown, Repulse, and Resistance as purpose-built battlecruisersQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:28:41A twelve-gun Bismarck would push King George V toward heavier weaponsQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:32:48Radical Admiral-class redesigns would cost nearly a new shipQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:36:50Fast battleships would follow the Revenge classQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/47:50:06J3 and K2 designs would overwhelm the High Seas FleetQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!2:41:42Designing a battleship in a peaceful 1942Q&A
- Naval History Live: Operations Tiger and Splice2:40:41Would France build Dunkerque without naval treaties?Q&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:19:08When British battleships and battlecruisers might convergeQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!2:22:53K2 and K3 were formidable designs rather than a final practical limitQ&A
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty9:04Why Tillman wanted a maximum battleshipChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty13:48Italy fought two different naval racesNotable Point
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty31:18Tillman III and IV as super-battleship benchmarksChapter
- Senator Tilman's Washington Naval Treaty33:58Why battlecruiser labels need a generational baselineNotable Point
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...16:03A battleship ceiling clears the way for cruisersChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...33:43Giant battleships face more than a Panama lock limitQ&A
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:33:31Britain can build a squadron of F3-like fast battleshipsChapter
- Patreon 97: What if Senator Tillman was at the Washington Naval Treaty...1:50:42Sixteen-inch battleships preserve visible parityQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!1:20:13How an F3 layout could produce a faster NelsonQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!2:08:56Why torpedo-style contra-rotating propellers do not scale easilyQ&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:06:21Why G3 and N3 were not the Royal Navy's whole building planQ&A
- Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered1:47:59A 45,000-ton F3-style Nelson classQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time1:30:06Francesco Caracciolo could define the fast battleshipQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time1:42:34A New York-derived battlecruiser gives the US Navy a fast wingQ&A
- Bruships 135: Japan again... Can I get through 12 books this time2:27:54N3 and South Dakota balance armor, shell weight, and volume of fireQ&A
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response4:06Caracciolo seakeeping beyond the MediterraneanQ&A
- Francesco Caracciolo: The Almost Next Battleship Era - KSS2 S6 Comment Response11:58Why the final Caracciolo design carried eight 15-inch gunsQ&A
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response7:48Why Tosa's rear structure is not a second funnelQ&A
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response10:46Why Amagi would not simply replace the Royal Navy's N3 programQ&A
- The Amagi Class: Super Kongos or Nascent Fast Battleships? - KSS2 S5 Comment Response13:37How a benchmark navy responds without admitting it followsNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response25:21Why G3's paper turret layout might have changed in the yardNotable Point
- Lexington Class: America's Battle Cruiser Dreams - KSS2 S4 Comment Response29:51What a no-treaty battlecruiser generation might have becomeQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response0:17Why the G3 remained a battlecruiserQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response7:14Battlecruisers do not require fewer turretsQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response12:12N3 gun caliber and an unknowable service historyQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response34:28Rearranging the K3 turrets for stabilityNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response36:15The all-forward battery still left room for antiaircraft gunsQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response41:41Why 1920s technology could not produce an IowaQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response43:48Queen Anne's Mansions traded target size for staff spaceNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:06:32All-forward guns traded stern fire for tactical controlQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:08:42Larger treaty ships widen Germany's industrial gapNotable Point
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:16:50F3 battlecruisers as a treaty alternativeQ&A
- The Missed Generation - The G3 & N3 classes: KSS2 S2 Comment Response1:24:48N3s and the hyper-dreadnought labelQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy9:30Battlecruisers as a spectrum of design intentChapter
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy22:30Where Fisher's large light cruisers fitQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:02:43Why Hood could dominate earlier dreadnoughtsNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:05:59What the F2 and F3 studies reveal about battlecruiser strategyQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:28:19Why G3's armor did not automatically make it a fast battleshipNotable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy1:34:49Could the F3 have been the first fast battleship?Notable Point
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:22:31Why Renown is the preferred battlecruiserQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy3:31:14Gun caliber does not locate a battlecruiser on the spectrumQ&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy3:38:08Why the 15-inch gun remained the practical choiceQ&A
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 73:42French industry bounded the early capital-ship studiesNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 710:56The Deutschlands turned a cruiser killer into DunkerqueChapter
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 715:21Why Britain explored a 25,000-ton battleship limitNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 746:29Spanish dreadnoughts clarify what makes a battleshipNotable Point
- Dunkerque Class: Fast Battleship or Battle Cruiser? - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 71:00:01What if France had built the 36,000-ton alternative?Notable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 1134:10Introducing Eagle's heavily armored capital-ship designChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 1146:17Why mature 16.5-inch turrets beat newer 17-inch gunsChapter
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 1154:38Spending saved gun weight on shells, protection, speed, and radarChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:18Why 11-inch guns did not make Scharnhorst a battlecruiserNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...3:31Why bigger naval guns were not automatically betterNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...7:08Why unbuilt capital ships are revealingChapter
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...9:40Germany's L20 and the appeal of 16.5-inch gunsNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...34:50Why 28 knots mattered in the MediterraneanNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...44:07When more armour can make a shell more destructiveNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...45:35Hood, G3, and the meaning of battlecruiserNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...1:04:02Why Britain's post-G3 plans remain uncertainNotable Point
- What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...2:00:39Unbuilt warships as a record of national ambitionChapter
- Bruships 126: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:09:43One-off capital ships carried the design process forwardQ&A
- Jutland with Competent Leadership of the British Battlecruiser Fleet - Sturdee replaces Beatty45:53Speed and the capital-ship spectrumNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 32:36The missing generation between Hood and NelsonChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 35:13Infrastructure, not aesthetics, drove the compact layoutChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 36:34Machinery heat, magazines, and evolving fire controlNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 38:24Wartime experience returns to the design officesNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 38:59What the unusual turret position gained and lostNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 310:24Why G3 and N3 would disrupt rival battlefleetsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 311:28G3 speed, range, and uncertain performance marginsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 313:20G3 as concentrated capability, not one breakthroughChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 315:06An alternate G3 layout for balance and maintenanceNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 318:37Internal separation made maintenance and resilience easierNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 321:25K3 as the fast nine-gun eighteen-inch extremeChapter
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 322:21The armour problem created by eighteen-inch gunsNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 328:02Francesco Caracciolo and a harder Mediterranean treaty bargainNotable Point
- G3 & N3 Classes: The Lost Dreadnought Generation, Key Ship Series 2, Ships 2 & 328:50Yamato-level firepower, not Yamato-level protectionNotable Point
- Patreon 72: If Jan 1939 Tsingtao incident leads to war, how does RN carrier force fair against IJN?1:32:49Yamato and the logic of big ships, big gunsQ&A
- Patreon 71: Why did the French Navy not more fully embrace carrier aviation after WWI?2:30:25Normandie's design and the break to DunkerqueNotable Point
- Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?1:15:28How French survival changes British shipbuildingNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)56:01Why the alternate treaty keeps the eight-inch cruiser limitNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)34:43A fast battle line would reshape rival designsChapter
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)40:16Why a two-ship pair produces a different designChapter
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)41:05Why the Revenge class becomes the slow secondary lineNotable Point
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)44:21Why treaty-maximum guns made the pair preciousNotable Point
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:26:36Why a pre-Washington bonus ship would not be a third NelsonQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191519:18Postwar capital ships extended the technology raceNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 19130:40HMS Tiger and the battlecruiser trade-offChapter
- Battles of Dogger Bank: Response to Comments16:36How battlecruiser speed and guns encouraged aggressive handlingNotable Point
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response22:38G3 blind arcs and concentrated turret firepowerQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response25:46Why an unrestricted gun race might revive mixed batteriesQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response32:15All-forward main guns versus the G3 and N3 Q turretQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response32:46Books for studying interwar treaty warshipsQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response33:51Could the X Kiwi design fit a 35,000-ton limit?Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes12:44From Dreadnought to the postwar capital-ship problemChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes19:29Why triple turrets were the practical sweet spotQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes25:34How wartime lessons pushed British designs upwardChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes32:24How different Grand Fleet leadership might have changed the G3Q&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes49:45Citadel layout concentrated guns, magazines, and armorChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes56:51The tactical cost of an all-forward main batteryChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes58:43Later British designs moved away from Nelson's all-forward batteryQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:00:52Why a one-inch increase mattered for battleship gunsQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:04:49Why turbo-electric drive did not solve the machinery-layout problemQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:08:43Waterline protection limited extreme citadel economiesNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:25:35Why moving the G3 bridge aft complicated ship controlQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:28:39G3 speed versus N3 gun powerChapter
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:39:52A fast battleship compromised by its center turretNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes1:49:28Surviving G3s could have raised the treaty battleship ceilingNotable Point
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:12:53Gun caliber eventually loses to rate of fireQ&A
- Patreon 15 - Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 classes2:27:02M3 was an earlier step toward the N3 battleshipQ&A