Related time notes
- Lions not Indefatigables; What if Australia & New Zealand go Battlecruiser not Battle Cruiser...1:15:46A victory that could erase Germany's Dogger Bank lessonsNotable Point
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:22:11How the OTO Melara 127/64 changes its ready ammunitionQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:41:29Hand-training a turret can obstruct its ammunition supplyNotable Point
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:10Choosing railgun calibre around mass and loadingQ&A
- Naval Architecture from Turret Ironclads to Super Dreadnoughts: HMS Monarch 1868 & 1911...31:02How could loaders keep handling heavy six-inch shells?Q&A
- Exploring the meme: Top 5 & Bottom 5 inventions/systems of war that started in British Sheds(Live)24:55A light railway for hypothetical 22-inch battleship shellsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress6:12:41Why sustained gun rates can understate a short burstNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress10:51:19Why a smaller gun need not produce a much smaller turretQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida10:31:29Would spare Puckle-style chambers solve slow reloading?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:46:55Why six-inch guns are a poor destroyer weaponQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II9:18:44Why Britain chose 5.25-inch instead of 5.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:16:34What Tribal-class torpedo tables leave outNotable Point
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P31:07:29How ammunition reached an 8-inch turret stacked on a 12-inch turretQ&A
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why3:50Japan's 100 mm gun and the air-defense tradeoffChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why30:19The 4.5-inch Mark V: powered loading and barrel lifeNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:06:28Why the 5-inch/38 succeeded as a complete systemChapter
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:20:26Japan's 127 mm guns and attrition doctrineChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?1:01Why the early 4.5-inch mount was difficult for destroyersChapter
- What changes if the Royal Navy Tribal class got built with 4.5in guns?35:41Prewar exercises expose mount and ammunition problemsChapter
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:12Handling 20-inch shells is a machinery problemQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:05:09What a US 5.4-inch gun would changeQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:11:06A British 5.5-inch dual-purpose gun pathNotable Point
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:06:37How Queen Elizabeth-class carriers move people, stores, and weaponsNotable Point
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:54:16Why modern navies have not standardized on 155 mm gunsQ&A
- The Royal Navy's Spirit Ship: HMS Tiger(1913) - Key Ships Series 9, Ship 957:36Jutland: independent captains and Tiger's survival under heavy fireChapter
- Of Two Submarines, in two wars... The sinkings of HMHS Britannic & IJS Kongo1:56:44Why Suffren's 6.5-inch shells strained manual handlingNotable Point
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/43:34:35Why ammunition handling doomed Queen MaryQ&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/48:15:01How open destroyer gun mounts received ammunitionQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/46:44:38How shell weight limits rotary magazinesQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/46:46:00Why linked ammunition feeds become risky as shells growQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/46:52:06Cartridge cases, lifting machinery, and manual shell handlingQ&A
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'1:22:48Dogger Bank could remove both German leaders and safety lessonsNotable Point
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:32:09Why 9.2 inches is the cruiser sweet spotQ&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:38:11Why 10-inch loading is a different problemQ&A
- Tiger Cubs - RN actually builds dreadnought armoured cruisers with 9.2in guns alongside HMS Tiger...2:49:51Shell weight and the ammunition-handling thresholdNotable Point
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:33:08What automated capital-ship loading meant before computersQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:14:53How transferable were sailors between naval gun crews?Q&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?2:02:58Could Bismarck fit triple 15-inch turrets?Q&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered2:37:43Why twin gun mounts spread slowly to smaller warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered3:11:21Ammunition handling and British battlecruiser losses at JutlandNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books4:16:05Why an army 155 mm gun is not a naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered1:30:04Why Hawkins carried 7.5-inch gunsQ&A
- Patreon 96: Odd ship designs that actually work.1:18:02Could Surcouf refill its ready magazines while submerged?Q&A
- The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies17:35Inside a World War I battleship ammunition chainChapter
- The Philosophy behind Autoloader Development for Navies28:02Why advertised gun rates mislead at seaChapter
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!1:20:38The practical advantages of the 8-inch cruiser gunQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:10:02Why British cruiser guns split into three calibresQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!2:54:00Longer gun barrels and propellant requirementsQ&A
- Bruships(Christmas Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:43:37Loading machinery creates practical naval-gun calibre breakpointsQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History16:36What counts as a naval autoloaderNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History48:12Ready-use ammunition buys time for the supply chainQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History49:46How heavy was the early quick-firing six-inch shell?Q&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History59:55Combat reliability and shell selection set the hard problemsChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:08:40Why secondary guns were not the easy autoloader targetQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:12:25A workable interwar ammunition-selection systemQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:24:49Where Iowa's assistance stops short of an autoloaderQ&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:26:29Why a turret cannot switch shell types instantlyNotable Point
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:27:16Does an autoloader increase the maximum loading angle?Q&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:28:53Can an unwanted heavy shell go back to the ready rack?Q&A
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History1:32:36Was Des Moines automatic all the way through the magazine?Q&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response7:43Why 20-inch super-heavy shells exceed practical limitsQ&A
- Tillman Class: Dreams of Super Battleships - KSS2 S8 Comment Response27:13Why turret complexity is a rule of thumb, not a formulaQ&A
- Bruships 130: Battleships2:28:08Selecting ammunition in a capital-ship autoloaderQ&A
- Jutland with Competent Leadership of the British Battlecruiser Fleet - Sturdee replaces Beatty56:06Magazine discipline and battlecruiser survivalChapter
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty33:17Would Dogger Bank change German ammunition lessons?Q&A
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty1:04:49Flash protection over rapid ammunition supplyNotable Point
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 196038:25Shell shape and fuzes turned projectiles into engineered systemsChapter
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 196056:00Heavy shells made mechanical ammunition handling essentialChapter
- How & Why during WWII MTBs became MGBs: European & Mediterranean Theatre1:30:14Why “quick-firing” did not mean automaticNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer2:46:34The practical limit on naval shell sizeQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done28:11Why shell weight does not set a simple powder ruleQ&A
- Bruships 103: Belfast Parts yet to arrive... so let's consider the Run up to War...29:16Estimating an 18-inch gun's rate of fireQ&A
- HMS Warrior(1860): The Benefits of Royal Protection?52:05The 68-pounder and Warrior's varied ammunitionNotable Point
- HMS Warrior(1860): The Benefits of Royal Protection?1:01:02Ammunition identification and gun handlingNotable Point
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat2:35:02Showing Jutland's battlecruiser losses before the warQ&A
- Bruships 94: Some New Books, Some Others Books and a lot of Naval Chat3:49:12Why the six-inch cruiser gun survives without treaty limitsQ&A
- Diadem Class: First Class Protected Cruisers (19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 10)12:28Why sixteen six-inch guns suited the Diadem roleChapter
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-4059:54Where naval ammunition handling stops being truly manualQ&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:16:44How did the Model 1929 six-inch gun fire so quickly?Q&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:30:49Why did Italian automatic gun mounts need special grease?Q&A
- Suffren Class: Mon croiseur de 1ère classe de la Marine Nationale préféré (Long Patrol)23:35From Suffren's 75 mm guns to the class's 90 mm batteryChapter
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World2:54:41Why heavy shells can fail during frantic loadingQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books58:58Why an opening salvo rate does not lastQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books1:28:17Why ammunition-handling practice is a safety systemQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:29:02How Jellicoe tightened ammunition handling after JutlandQ&A
- M29 Class (M33 special, Ep2/2) - Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol Part 929:46Shell hoists and cordite completed the ammunition chainNotable Point
- M29 Class (M33 special, Ep1/2) - Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol Part 921:18Glatton and the danger of improper magazine insulationNotable Point
- Battle of Tassafaronga: 30th of November 1942 - Long Patrol27:37Wright's command temperament and the Port Chicago comparisonNotable Point
- Dreadnoughts that Almost Were of the WWI Era...1:21:02Why Britain might accept a lighter 18-inch shellQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions34:17Could an autoloader explain Agincourt's design mystery?Q&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions44:19A 31-inch gun becomes an ammunition-handling problemQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions52:35Why battleship rate of fire is a machinery problemNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions59:54How a battleship's main battery was fired electricallyQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:12:18A turret fire makes loaded ammunition the immediate hazardQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:30:17Autoloaders were studied for later Lion designsQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:43:57The US eight-inch autoloader accepted a narrower motion envelopeQ&A
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:44:46A battleship-caliber Gatling gun multiplies the wrong machineryQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers2:31:50Tiger's automatic guns suffered stoppagesQ&A
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans51:50Ammunition handling for turret-top light gunsQ&A
- The Battles of Dogger Bank 1696-19162:01:42What quick-firing meant before automatic loadingNotable Point
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora48:02Mixed ammunition burdens encouraged gun standardizationQ&A
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora2:32:23How protected cruisers supplied their gunsQ&A
- RN Paper Cruisers; the what might have beens…47:21Six inches sat near the loading-technology sweet spotQ&A