Related time notes
- Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:39Why Australia kept its County-class cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live32:43Choosing a Royal Navy ballistic missile interceptorQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:56:57Stratus and Royal Navy missile commonalityQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:04:33A postwar Bismarck would need missiles and new machineryQ&A
- Bruships 255: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:20:26How early could naval VLS have appeared?Q&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 212:26Should warships carry HIMARS-style launcher canisters?Q&A
- Task Force Doctrine; How it evolved from WWI to WWII in the big three navys - IJN, RN & USN(Patreon)1:24:38Large escorts can raise the cost of contesting sea controlNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...59:07Why separating radar and missile ships can create a dependencyNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:00:10Type 45 power improvements and Sea Ceptor instead of Mark 41Notable Point
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:54A naval-missile counterfactual in the Korean WarQ&A
- Bruships 243: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:22:52Why containerized Q-ships are hard to concealQ&A
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?41:55Peacetime deterrence sustains missile researchNotable Point
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?43:13Missile equipment could favour cruisers with smaller main gunsNotable Point
- If WWII is delayed, what do the Warships of the 1950s look like?58:31Småland's torpedo turntable suggests a missile retrofit pathNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:40:49Anti-ship ballistic missiles as threat and weaponQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:44:42Shorter flight time and the costs of closing missile rangeQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:48:50Guidance and production limits on hypersonic missilesNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:09:42Harpoon as a classic and Naval Strike Missile for a new fitQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:10:11P-700 Granit and the size of heavy anti-ship missilesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 18: Guns & Points of Order43:39Talos and the shipboard factory problemNotable Point
- Why is a Frigate a Frigate and other questions of modern navys?45:49Modern frigate and destroyer labels signal system priorityChapter
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!43:45Mark 41 changes the Type 31 weapons fitChapter
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!44:43The strike-missile sequencing dilemmaNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon5:58:54Why navies separate missiles from gun barrelsQ&A
- Sergey Georgyevich Gorshkov: The Architect Behind and the Face of the Soviet Navy46:45Missile defence changes how fleet combat power is measuredChapter
- Sergey Georgyevich Gorshkov: The Architect Behind and the Face of the Soviet Navy54:24How missiles changed the scale of naval strikeChapter
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:01:49British nuclear cruisers reshape the Commonwealth fleetQ&A
- Building Ships Out of Time; or Why sometimes nations seem to build last generation ships39:58Why modern warships retain deck guns alongside missilesChapter
- Bruships 199: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:49:53Mark 41 canisters integrate European naval missilesQ&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?3:01:41Why did the Royal Navy not adopt the Bofors L70?Q&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?3:05:20Could an L70-era Pom-Pom have survived after 1945?Q&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?3:08:17Missiles, not jets, displaced the Royal Navy's BoforsQ&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?3:10:49The first Type 22 frigates retained Bofors after allNotable Point
- Bruships 192: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:42Why Talos launchers did not receive successor missilesQ&A
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!1:58:22Why missile-era survivability differs from battleship armorNotable Point
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!2:04:23Why missile-era naval power is harder to visualizeNotable Point
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!2:11:36Can naval missiles serve secondary anti-ship roles?Q&A
- Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/41:59:02Why Aster 30 and SM-6 are not direct equivalentsQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax2:19:16How the Falklands corrected the all-missile warship ideaQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax2:38:05Why the missile-only warship had a very short design windowQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 6: Responding to some History Hot Takes...14:35Carrier defence against drones and missilesQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 6: Responding to some History Hot Takes...17:37Missile production, stockpiles, and unit costNotable Point
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...1:52:23How fifteen-gun Towns could support missile modernizationQ&A
- Bruships 155: Last time answering naval history questions from the Brushack?3:27:36Western response to a large Soviet cruiser programQ&A
- Bruships 149: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Ends1:46:04Novorossiysk in the postwar battleship gapQ&A
- Aircraft Carriers in Science Fiction26:47What separates Sea Ceptor from Aster 15?Q&A
- Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!3:03:33What Alaska-based missile cruisers might retainQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare15:14A Cold War refit for the Neptune-class cruiserQ&A
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare39:52Displacement for an eight-gun Tribal-style destroyerQ&A
- When does a navy know it is time to replace a type or class of ships? P2/2 Lego enhanced discussion1:21:16Modularity works best with realistic technical ambitionNotable Point
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases1:37:25Vertical launch needed missile control, not only deck boxesQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases3:50:59Empty missile cells preserve cheaper future growthQ&A
- Neptune Class: The Cruiser Conundrum Crisis - Key Ships Series 6, Ship 66:23Mountbatten's specialist-escort alternativeNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 856:56Why missiles on a carrier create flight-deck tradeoffsQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 859:38Naval upgrades lose out when long lead times meet short-term politicsNotable Point
- Being the Benchmark Navy: It has Costs as well as Benefits49:14SSNs, drones, and the next naval benchmarkNotable Point
- USS Monitor: Key Ships Series 3, Ship 619:08Why VLS escaped the firing-arc problemNotable Point
- Albany Class: Comment Response6:22Shoot-X and early missile reliabilityNotable Point
- Albany Class: Comment Response19:23Why early missile cruisers need system-by-system analysisNotable Point
- Kara Class: Comment Response0:50Sea Sparrow and Sea Wolf as reference pointsQ&A
- Kara Class: Comment Response1:40Osa, Wasp, and the layers of Soviet missile namingQ&A
- Kara Class: Comment Response2:54When an air-defence missile becomes an anti-ship weaponNotable Point
- Kara Class: Comment Response5:30Why SA-N-3 comparisons change by generationNotable Point
- Stalingrad Class Battlecruiser: Key Ships Series 2, Ship 715:01How Western navies might answer StalingradChapter
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation28:10Why Victorious could not easily take Sea CatQ&A
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation3:22:46A dribble attack can empty VLS magazinesNotable Point
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation3:33:16At-sea reloading is VLS's fleet-level constraintNotable Point
- Bruships 110: Naval Aviation3:42:46Why missile defence still fires two interceptorsQ&A
- Timberborne: A Test for the Year of Technology/My students favourite 'engineering game'1:14:50Reloads and survivability in the small-ship debateQ&A
- New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...2:03:24ASROC modernization attracts less attention than headline missilesQ&A
- Soviet Navy Part 2/3: 1939-6546:26Whiskey-class submarines as Soviet test bedsChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 2/3: 1939-6552:36Political risk encouraged iterative ship and weapons developmentChapter
- Soviet Navy Part 2/3: 1939-6557:05Big guns remained legible tools of Cold War presenceNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 2/3: 1939-651:37:20Visible armament helped Soviet ships fight the peaceNotable Point
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)24:52Missile depletion could return naval guns to prominenceQ&A
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 3 (Sfax - Geffion)30:09The lost Zumwalt railgun fleet conceptQ&A
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions22:30Protecting a missile-refitted Lion from gun blastQ&A
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:30:45Why Europe should standardize systems rather than hullsQ&A
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions42:13Changing warheads in a vertical launch systemQ&A
- Bruships 64: Naval History & Sci-fi Books reviewed and Questions answered...1:11:34A modern battleship built around power generation and missilesQ&A
- Tribals, Battles & Darings/British Trawlers & Drifters in 2 World Wars: A Book or Two To Review (36)37:30The gun-to-missile transition was not a simple replacementNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...14:05The City-class baseline: missiles, gun, sonar, and growth spaceChapter
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...16:35Why the close-in weapon fit still mattersNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...28:17Mission-bay flexibility versus permanent armamentNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:55:05Why the rating system counts launch cells, not every missileNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:58:09Why empty VLS cells usually mean a return to portQ&A
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...2:03:01Carriers keep combat power reloadable at seaNotable Point
- Battle of Kentish Knock (8th of October 1652)3:43:40Why did Cold War weapon proposals become so extreme?Q&A
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions...1:51:20Guided-missile submarines are the closest modern cruiser-submarine analogueNotable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World41:55Why Cold War anti-ship missiles still matterNotable Point
- Bruships 38: Amphibious Operations & Equipment2:49:09Why offensive missiles can endanger amphibious shipsQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:51:31Are modern warships under-armed for their sizeQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?1:11:40A modern patrol craft based on an RNLI hullQ&A
- Patreon Video 1: What would you put in warehouses at the end of WWI for WWII if you could?1:31:29Why missile arsenals can undermine amphibious shipsQ&A