Choosing a Royal Navy ballistic missile interceptor

Should the Royal Navy adopt SM-3 or the MBDA Aquila family for ballistic missile defence?

SM-3 has proven appeal, while Aquila better fits the missile families and logistics already used by Britain.

Both interceptors remain credible options because future British ships can carry strategic-length Mark 41 and Sylver cells. SM-3 earns confidence from its test record and established performance. Aquila has a stronger logistics case because it belongs with systems Britain already operates and is being designed for both launcher families. The preference therefore divides between affection for SM-3 and the practical advantages of a European weapon with common support arrangements.