Related time notes
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live25:07Tiger cruiser armament and a distinct secondary batteryQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:09:42Ammunition scale from a Matilda tank to a battleshipNotable Point
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:11Protecting and arming base fuses in armor-piercing shellsQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:13:01Why a warship cannot easily manufacture its own weaponsQ&A
- Bruships 248: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:35:40The Pacific air-defence burden without the VT fuseQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:40:41Hood's 4-inch ammunition was distributed around the shipQ&A
- Bruships 246: Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:02:46Logistics and sea conditions test elegant ideas that work on paperNotable Point
- Bruships 237: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:01:58Heavy radar-directed guns against dronesQ&A
- What the Frigates up with our Frigates? A Bilgepumps Christmas 2025 @Drachinifel& @wgowshipping31:16Guided-shell commonality can matter more than matching the gunNotable Point
- A Chinese Invasion of Taiwan: A Historian’s Eye View & A Patreon’s Request…(Live 2)1:03:53How much supply would an amphibious force consume?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress3:24:45The industries behind a large cannon-export tradeNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida6:30:26Twelve Dingyuans would still need ammunition and trained crewsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida8:02:15A rotary 6-inch gun and ammunition handlingQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida10:02:16An early turret hit complicates the treaty-cruiser comparisonNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy I17:28Tracing Casablanca's 16-inch shells through wartime logisticsQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:52:42Pom-pom belt mixes and tracer ballisticsQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:37:54Doctrine, range, and the shells actually availableQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:08:32What determines a battleship's ammunition mixQ&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:11:36Which shells did Warspite use against the Zara class?Q&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:12:54Why paper ammunition loads need supply logsNotable Point
- Bruships 210: Naval History Questions Answered Live...11:10Why tracer ammunition did not suit First World War main gunsQ&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:35:12What Ukraine suggests about preparing navies for high-intensity warQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:44:40Why fourteen guns make Super Hawkins growQ&A
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:46:30Super Hawkins needs ammunition as well as additional gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:57:10A disputed small-arms analogy for repeated armor hitsNotable Point
- CSS Arkansas & Isaac N. Brown... A study in tactical excellence & strategic incompetence...3:39Steam leakage dampens Arkansas's powderNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:40Why a future naval gun may jump from five to six inchesQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:52:05Why tank mobility limits gun-barrel lengthNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?7:33Correction to a shell bursting-charge comparisonNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?44:17A like-for-like Mark 8 Pom-Pom and L60 comparisonChapter
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:12:23Tropical ammunition failures begin with wartime stowageNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:26:23Could different ammunition extend the Pom-Pom's range?Q&A
- Jellicoe's Jutland: Analytical leadership at its best and its most problematic53:41Readiness and shell testing through repeated false alarmsChapter
- What if HMS Indomitable replaced Prince of Wales in Force Z?1:50:27Supplying a reinforced fleet at SingaporeQ&A
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:23Why NATO magazines still use stripper clipsNotable Point
- David Farragut: Leadership from Roll Models & Experience1:26:13Why ships could carry heavier shells than armiesNotable Point
- David Farragut: Leadership from Roll Models & Experience3:47:16Fire forces Fort Morgan to flood its magazineNotable Point
- Anti Submarine Warfare, a primer history & overview2:58:49Why Ascension and the Falklands still matter logisticallyQ&A
- Frigating Tiger Cubs: WWI if the Royal Navy builds some 9.2in armed 'Dreadnought Cruisers'3:13Gun selection was also an industrial policyNotable Point
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....1:00:37High-angle heavy guns and ammunition weightQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!1:25:27Why Scharnhorst's shells need not repeat River Plate failuresQ&A
- Check Campaign 22: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:14:17Littorio's problem was ammunition quality controlQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:22:06Pom-pom failures as a logistics problemNotable Point
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off1:25:38Tracer ammunition and Force ZQ&A
- Check Campaign 15: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:25:09Ammunition storage for an enormous secondary batteryQ&A
- The Furious Age: The First Aircraft Carriers43:29Useful volume and simpler armament define design efficiencyNotable Point
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books3:30:59A doubtful story about improvised cannon ammunitionQ&A
- Check Campaign 5: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:02:01Does barrel length change magazine requirements?Q&A
- A Naval Historian Reacts to: Battle cruisers in a modern navy… Well a WWII Navy2:05:34Why wartime seizures multiplied Royal Navy gun typesQ&A
- Patreon 88: Sydney Strategy: When looking for a Far East Naval Base - what if Sydney not Singapore?1:41:35A Sydney strategy expands 15-inch coastal artilleryChapter
- Bruships 128: Invasions & Amphibious Warfare1:03:59Rail traffic sustaining wartime PortsmouthQ&A
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty2:16:42Italian gunnery was undermined by shell quality, not aimingQ&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series1:53:39A dual-purpose gun's ammunition choicesQ&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:02:35How much discretion captains have over ammunition loadsQ&A
- Bruships 124: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series2:03:43Why navies standardized propellants and explosivesQ&A
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 411:13Four main-battery calibres for ten battleshipsChapter
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture19:37Jutland: better shells and gunnery disciplineNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?1:03:26Could a 15-inch/50 reuse 15-inch/42 ammunition?Q&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?3:45:51Balancing shell mass, velocity, barrel life, and rate of fireQ&A
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?4:02:14Why common calibre does not require a common 155 mm shellQ&A
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:18:37Shell choice changes the ammunition problemNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon18:05What made the later Greenboy shell more effectiveChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon23:03Shell design lagged behind long-range battle doctrineNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon1:03:05Which British capital ships would receive new shells firstNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck33:00Giving the Bismarck model a fair historical allowanceNotable Point
- Still Trying to deal with the Inadvertently Created Super Bismarck1:02:29Winning because the enemy exhausts its main-battery ammunitionNotable Point
- Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword1:01:36Salvo density versus magazine enduranceNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers51:42Precision strikes do not remove the ammunition problemNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers52:43Too many gun calibers for a global warNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:13:33Ammunition systems must be stressed-human-proofNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:18:34How cutting the Zumwalt class drove ammunition cost upwardNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers1:26:28Zumwalt ammunition lock-in and the cancellation logicChapter
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?14:23Why the 4.7-inch variants did not share ammunition freelyQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?33:45Why French 130 mm ammunition would not fitQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?36:46Projectile weight, range, and the price of developmentQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?48:03Fixed ammunition was not the only 4.7-inch obstacleQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:50:23Magazine space limits calibre substitutionQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?2:11:12A common calibre speeds proximity-fuze distributionQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road47:24A sixteen-gun battleship needs roughly four thousand main-battery shellsQ&A
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video1:28:12Why Canada chose a Leonardo naval gunQ&A
- 19th Century Cruisers: Comment Response Video 1 (Introduction - Shannon)1:03:18Why an undersized shell could destroy its gunQ&A
- Major Axis Navies: Five Problems & How to Fix them in January 193923:42Repairing Italian ammunition quality controlNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:34:42Italian ammunition quality as a preventable fleet weaknessQ&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:14:56Fast-firing guns meet ammunition and maintenance limitsChapter
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?54:52Why missile shortages could restore naval gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 79: Eight New Books, plus Discussions of a Naval Nature13:45Fire control and the first hit in a naval simulationNotable Point
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...1:19:11When baked-bean cans became naval projectilesQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)3:14:36Why Italian battleship gunnery was inconsistentQ&A
- Bruships 73: Some Old, Some New, None Borrowed, but Some Blue2:00:03Why fuel and ammunition make a difficult combined auxiliaryQ&A
- Battle Cruiser Squadron Action: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)14:43An outnumbered squadron should break contactNotable Point
- HMS Tiger - The Battle Cruiser Hunter: A UAD infused discussion36:03The 13.5-inch gun as a logistical choiceNotable Point
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru1:18:16Three warnings for the Royal Navy before three warsQ&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru2:30:35Could a 20-inch-gun ship exhaust its main battery?Q&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru3:13:03Why close-in weapon systems use different gun arrangementsQ&A
- Take 2: Pearl Harbour – A product of the Kantai Kessen Doctrine or something to do? (Live)1:16:45Pearl Harbor was not fully ready to sustain warNotable Point
- Sherman's March to the Sea8:18Why standardised logistics matteredNotable Point
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore16:39Fuel is only one part of replenishmentChapter
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore1:48:54Mediterranean logistics were limited by ammunitionChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)3:01:38Why equal-calibre army and naval guns may not share ammunitionNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)56:52Could Kongo use British 14-inch ammunition?Q&A
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Churchill WWI) – The Comment Questions23:19Shell quality, acceptance, and live firingQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)21:43Magazine and salvage hazards in sunken warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)26:09Compatibility among 13.5-inch ammunition typesQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)1:18:49German gun quality versus British shell weightQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)1:29:43British shell fuzes and Greenboy quality controlNotable Point
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)2:43:21Why larger guns reduced barrel countQ&A
- Pepsiships 47: Age of Sail46:08How explosive cannonballs were fusedQ&A
- Bruships 45: Something Medieval33:28Why was iron a plausible material for early naval shot?Q&A
- Bruships 45: Something Medieval42:17How certain is the distinction between stone shot ashore and iron at sea?Q&A
- Bruships 45: Something Medieval2:54:51Bombards, casting limits, and separate powder chambersChapter
- Bruships 45: Something Medieval2:57:35A tentative date for iron shot in early shipboard cannonQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers2:42:58Why the Tigers were unavailable in 1982Q&A
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)3:15:23Why 75 mm, 76 mm, and 3-inch guns kept different labelsNotable Point
- Bruships 27: Science Fiction Books40:32The hidden logistics of photon torpedoesNotable Point
- Bilgepumps does Battlestar Galatica Deadlock for Navy Con 2/28:24Building a flak field takes gun volumeNotable Point
- Bilgepumps does Battlestar Galatica Deadlock for Navy Con 2/223:42Magazine depth across repeated missile attacksNotable Point
- Bilgepumps does Battlestar Galatica Deadlock for Navy Con 2/241:36Falling flak can complicate a torpedo approachNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5a Introduction to Patreon Video 454:39Far Eastern munitions and the Cape delayNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5a Introduction to Patreon Video 455:42Ammunition consumption and the friction of warNotable Point
- An Introduction to “The Battle of Malaya & Force Z” – Part 2: The Counter-Factual; My Plan16:29Singapore's coastal guns still face an ammunition limitNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A34:13Official warship loads may differ from combat loadsNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A48:41Why British shells could carry larger bursting chargesQ&A