Related time notes
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?2:52National tonnage quotas and fleets of 35,000-ton shipsChapter
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:15:44Existing large ships change a later displacement ceilingNotable Point
- What happens to the Navys if the Washington Treaty is held off till 1927?1:31:55A possible 2,500- to 3,000-ton destroyerNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?1:32A rough hull comparison puts Tiger near existing 15-inch shipsNotable Point
- What if the RN decided to upgrade HMS Tiger to 15in guns?34:23Standard displacement hides Tiger's full-load scaleNotable Point
- What happens if the British & Japanese refuse to break their alliance? (Patreon Live)2:18:20Standard displacement belongs to the treaty systemQ&A
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...56:04Alphabet classes grow around the torpedo attackChapter
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...58:18Why official torpedo loads omit spare weaponsNotable Point
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...1:02:18Published destroyer figures offer an incomplete pictureNotable Point
- Harnessing and Maintaining Thoughtful Aggression! Royal Navy Destroyers of the Interwar Years...1:05:23The E/F and G/H comparison questions a 60-ton savingNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?3:46How standard displacement could hide wartime weightChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?6:41Light peacetime armour on a hull prepared for warNotable Point
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?9:55Carrier definitions leave aviation weight open to argumentChapter
- Cheatimus Maximus Washington Naval Treaty: What happens if all the powers do all the cheats?49:47New-ship declarations and protective feed-water tanksChapter
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:23:09Ryūjō and the logic of treaty loopholesQ&A
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?39:01Why a Washington-style treaty cannot work in 1909Chapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?49:45The plausible treaty: cap individual ships, not fleetsChapter
- Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like?1:14:28Displacement evasions would erode the treatyChapter
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:10:54How the Royal Navy preferred to bend treaty rulesQ&A
- Bruships 182: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:20:17Des Moines as an example of a 15,000-ton cruiserQ&A
- Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...2:07:32Naval treaties tolerated a bounded margin of misstatementNotable Point
- Treaty Era Aircraft Carriers: A Discussion7:31Washington Treaty definitions and national carrier allowancesChapter
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō12:16The treaty loophole behind small carriersChapter
- Patreon 90: How were warship autoloader turrets prototyped? A development History2:07:13Did ammunition count toward treaty displacement?Q&A
- USS Enterprise: A Star is Born - KSS3 S4 Comment Response0:51Why Ranger and Wasp remained experimental carriersQ&A
- USS Enterprise: A Star is Born - KSS3 S4 Comment Response14:19Yorktown-class growth margins and treaty tonnageQ&A
- Graf Zeppelin: KSS2 S1 Comment Response20:31How British practice shaped naval treaty rulesQ&A
- Patreon 86: Jutland with Competent British Battlecruiser Fleet Commander - Sturdee replaces Beatty2:47:46A higher baseline for naval limitationNotable Point
- Patreon 66: "Washington Cheaties"1:43:38What standard displacement counted aboard a carrierQ&A
- Equitable London Treaty: Summary (Long Patrol)1:07:59A flat submarine allowance for all major powersChapter
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video1:50What do five destroyer tonnage briefs reveal?Q&A
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video6:01The 1,500-ton design cannot carry its intended armamentChapter
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video10:52Navies understated destroyer tonnage under treaty limitsNotable Point
- A Treaty Inspired Destroyer Design Discussion: UAD & Patreon Infused video19:20Concealed torpedo reloads undermine declared tonnageNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)2:19HMS Kempenfelt sets the destroyer scaleNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)12:00The London Treaty's destroyer rulesChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)20:39The 1936 treaty left destroyers loosely definedChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)25:22USS The Sullivans shows the post-treaty scaleNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)26:28Historical ceilings produced small destroyer fleetsNotable Point
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)28:40Modern destroyer missions demanded more displacementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)29:34A 10:10:7:4:4 destroyer settlementChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)34:14Destroyer quantity versus individual capabilityChapter
- Equitable London Treaty: Destroyers (Long Patrol)42:11Make the flotilla the treaty unitChapter
- Equitable London Treaties: Cruisers (Long Patrol)25:12How prescriptive limits encouraged creative accountingChapter
- Patreon 54: Torpedo development 1900-1939 and it's impact on destroyer design an doctrine2:17:00Treaty displacement rules invited creative accountingQ&A
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)45:00Modelling a Kii-based Japanese battleshipNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)48:21American firepower at the cost of speedNotable Point
- An Equitable Washington Treaty: Capital Ships with UAD (Long Patrol)1:24:39A workable ceiling rewards naval constructorsNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)36:09Why treaty declarations manipulated displacementQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)47:42The practical margin around treaty displacementQ&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)16:03How could HMS Hood remain the world's largest warship?Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)21:52Why propose a 40,000-ton treaty limit?Q&A
- Anglo Japanese War: If Tsingtao caused a war in January 1939 (Comment Response)37:16A 10:10:7:4:4 treaty ratio for capital shipsQ&A
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion5:02From treaty tonnage to a full-load warshipNotable Point
- If Hood Was the Washington Template not the exception: A UAD infused discussion42:19What 41,000 tons buys a capital shipChapter
- Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney (Long Patrol)38:41How the treaty defined capital ships and displacementNotable Point
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney2:44:21What standard displacement meant under the treatyNotable Point
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore2:38:56Treaty fuel exclusion favored global naviesNotable Point
- Bruships 53: The Big Gun Era... Questions1:35:08Wartime torpedo reloads reveal treaty design marginsNotable Point
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers2:11:04What full-load displacement addsQ&A
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from22:12Standard displacement excluded fuel and reserve waterChapter
- Crown Colony Class Long Patrol: Part 1 - where did they come from41:43Fiji and Ceylon compressed Town-class capabilityChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers27:53How the 1936 London Naval Treaty constrained cruiser designChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers28:12What treaty standard displacement included and excludedNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers41:36Crown Colony specifications and doubts about displacementChapter
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers47:56Why the Crown Colonies' displacement figures invite scrutinyNotable Point
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers2:22:21How did the Royal Navy calculate a cruiser's official displacement?Q&A
- Crown Colony Class Cruisers2:47:02How treaty accounting could mislead naval intelligenceNotable Point
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:06:49How the Town class's water-filled bulges workedQ&A
- Town Class; big impact with a light footprint2:26:52Why a 10,000-ton Town looked much largerQ&A
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-719:52Article 6: measuring a warship without fuelChapter
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 1 of 5/Articles 1-723:19Article 7 caps submarines but preserves exceptionsChapter
- Sloops of the Interwar a Long Patrol24:16What the Washington Treaty left openChapter
- Patreon Video 4: Tsingtao 1939 Goes Hot...34:13Why merchant tonnage and warship displacement differNotable Point
- Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy1:34:57Using fuel as armor under treaty rulesNotable Point