Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:42:28Engineering disciplines and defence-industry recruitmentQ&A
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:43:35Arms and perfume companies competing for engineering talentQ&A
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?4:55Why drones do not remove the costs of warfareNotable Point
- Britain's Rearmament 1937 vs 2026: What Lessons are we forgetting?13:54Matching Britain's global ambitions to its armed forcesNotable Point
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live16:30Boxer versus Patria: keeping an established production line workingNotable Point
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:15:49Defence spending as insurance and domestic investmentQ&A
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)1:10:57EPC purchasing decisions and continuing industrial involvementNotable Point
- The Big Frigate Discussion: ASWFs, F110s & Pohjanmaas vs Gowind, European Patrol Corvette & FF(X)1:16:26A common European ship identity and competing national needsNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:04:12The Defender replacement and British industrial workQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:25:40Boeing fighter contracts and competing suppliersQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:28:53British aircraft manufacturing and F-35 workNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:32:42Competing aircraft companies and different design ideasNotable Point
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:38:03Japan as an alternative arms supplier for TaiwanQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:17:05Defence procurement, skilled work and exportsNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:34:24Studying foreign weapons during indigenous developmentQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:37:59OTO Melara's Vickers and Italian originsQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:39:15Vickers connections across the arms industryNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:40:35Protecting industrial plans and assets from Nazi controlNotable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:45:16Vickers and Mitsubishi as industrial partnersQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:46:27What states could buy from Vickers and ArmstrongChapter
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:54:31Imagining Vickers-Armstrongs surviving intactQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:56:02Government resistance to further Vickers expansionNotable Point
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...2:02:17Affordable guns in a layered defence against dronesQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...3:35:14Drone volume and the cost of advanced missilesNotable Point
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?6:58Defence spending and the cost of losing capabilityNotable Point
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:26:33A J-10 purchase would force Egypt to build a new support systemQ&A
- Bruships 256: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:59:57Risks of military ownership in industrial enterprisesQ&A
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...2:50The Third Sea Lord tied procurement to one accountable officeNotable Point
- Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...22:37World War II infrastructure made Cold War missile research cheaperNotable Point
- Admiral Katsutoshi Kawano: The defining Chief of Staff of Japan's Joint Staff of 21st Century31:44Mogami exports and Japan's defense industryNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:13:33Whether US munitions expansion can outlast an election cycleQ&A
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:58:05Why Fincantieri can profit from expanding warship capacityQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...9:41How Swedish industrial backing shapes a frigate choiceQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...29:02Lider and the value of an unbuilt prestige projectNotable Point
- Trials and Tribulations- why ships go through the testing they do before they enter service2:09:17Offensive weapons advertise themselves; defensive demand followsNotable Point
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:36:49Greenland tensions and NATO defence supply chainsQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)25:47Why short production runs inflate warship pricesQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)1:16:45Goalkeeper made Phalanx a stronger competitorNotable Point
- Future Fleets: Some Ideas of Naval Warfare57:05Defence marketing rewards new wonder-weapon narrativesNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:02:34What Ajax reveals about defence procurement failureQ&A
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:09:23Creating a defence monopoly and then avoiding itNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:13:01An attributed account of inconsistent Ajax hullsNotable Point
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:51:34Why inheriting Soviet weapons did not equal usable powerQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:24:12Why gas-turbine choices cluster around two suppliersNotable Point
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:04:18Why FCAS and GCAP turn on industrial workshareQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:06:08Industrial contributions and access to European defence programmesQ&A
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:38:40What would a new GCAP member have to contribute?Q&A
- A Chinese Invasion of Taiwan: A Historian’s Eye View & A Patreon’s Request…(Live 2)2:42:01Taiwan supplements scarce Patriots with domestic missile workQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…12:35How invading a critical supplier crippled Russian productionNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…16:42How the Hostomel coup de main became a long warNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…21:59Why allies are rebuilding domestic defence productionQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon3:28:35Industrial contacts mattered as much as covert naval intelligenceQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon8:54:34Why advanced arms sales to Iran carry technology-transfer risksQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War6:18:18From Vickers' national systems to BAE's partnershipsNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress1:34:11Could Britain have built its own submarine-launched missile?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida33:16Would Switzerland have let Oerlikon go bankrupt?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida10:10:18A British Red Hawk as training and industrial policyQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida10:14:30Why a trainer's production location enters the procurement debateQ&A
- Tom's Cat: The Story of the F14 Tomcat26:12How the TF30's problems strengthened engine competitionNotable Point
- How has Ukraine confirmed, dispelled or updated the lessons of the Falklands War 1982?1:52:33Raw footage and the wider information warNotable Point
- Bruships 198: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:19Australia needs escorts and an industrial base as well as submarinesNotable Point
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:23:19Why GCAP matters as an industrial-sovereignty programNotable Point
- Bruships 194: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:25:34What a headline defence price can concealNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 21st Century Battleship: Chat & Comment Response...1:01:27Why public defense claims demand cautionNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?39:53Single-customer defence industry defies ordinary market logicChapter
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?52:14Shipyard specialisation limits competition and adds capacity costsNotable Point
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?1:29:53Replacing the Land Rover Defender exposes an industrial-policy gapNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!3:53:30Can Britain sustain a competitive naval-shipyard model?Q&A
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...2:17:59Israeli anti-torpedo systems and active defensesNotable Point
- Seaplane Tenders: An Earlier Answer to the Battle of the Atlantic?15:45Split Fleet Air Arm control obstructed a tender programChapter
- Royal Navy gets activist for Research & Development from 1900 onwards...1:04How naval research and development worked in 1900Chapter
- Royal Navy gets activist for Research & Development from 1900 onwards...2:35State and industry took different research risksNotable Point
- Royal Navy gets activist for Research & Development from 1900 onwards...5:46Integrated armaments firms could equip entire statesNotable Point
- Royal Navy gets activist for Research & Development from 1900 onwards...1:55:38The qualitative naval race ran through international suppliersNotable Point
- The Admiralty: A Contest of Leadership with Management... Naval History Live1:30:17Why the Royal Navy retained its own dockyardsQ&A
- The Admiralty: A Contest of Leadership with Management... Naval History Live3:39:43Why warship contracts went to politically important yardsQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 8: Beatty, Sopwith Cuckoos, Carriers & the Defence Debate...12:52How competition can make open-ended naval research productiveNotable Point
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax3:27:28American wartime mass production did not mean disposable qualityQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax5:20:48The economic case for Royal Navy-owned specialist yardsQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat2:10:08Why Britain might still choose the F/A-18Q&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!2:31:43Britain's defence industry needed consistent plansQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!3:08:11A major postwar Royal Canadian Navy needs national commitmentQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!2:36:44F/A-18 commonality versus a domestic British carrier fighterQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!36:43Reading Chinese missile-factory production claimsQ&A
- Bruships 151: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Vote13:33Brewster without a Second World War production surgeQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins1:10:09Why an eighteen-inch gun has no clean development priceQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins1:35:30Why Britain would not seed a rival French jet-engine industryQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins3:18:03Breguet 1120 adoption and later French carrier fightersQ&A
- Imperial Star Destroyers if designed by the World's Major Navys in 193820:02Vickers-Armstrongs and Britain's arms industryNotable Point
- Bruships 131: Battleships...2:26:43Why Britain would try to copy an early F-35Q&A
- Bruships 131: Battleships...2:34:16WG.1 versus Chinook as an industrial choiceQ&A
- Unrotated Projectiles to Hypersonics: Some History & thoughts on Missiles as part of navies38:02Treat missile performance claims as sales claimsNotable Point
- Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!3:18:56How American isolationism could sustain British aircraft productionQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 42:03:19Defence industry survives through political geographyNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 42:36:49Who built Royal Navy gun turrets?Q&A
- Sovetsky Soyuz (Советский Союз) Class: Stalin's Battleship Dreams - Key Ships Series 4, Ship 338:20Why shipyard competition changes naval procurement costsNotable Point
- US Nuclear Powered Cruisers: Comment Response32:19Warsaw Pact control over Polish industry and aviationNotable Point
- What would battleship and cruiser guns look like If modern technology were applied to them?23:13Why an 18-inch gun cannot simply be restartedNotable Point
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done2:44:27Italian ammunition quality and corrupt contractingNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?28:45Why a known shell problem resisted reformNotable Point
- Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build27:38Distributing a Commonwealth defence industryQ&A
- Bruships 101: No Dalmations, but a whole HMS Belfast to build2:30:17Foreign aircraft as Commonwealth stopgapsQ&A
- The Great Ships: 1st, 2nd & 3rd Rates in 18th Century (Comment Response)59:27The 32-pounder boom-and-bust marketNotable Point
- The Great Ships: 1st, 2nd & 3rd Rates in 18th Century (Comment Response)1:00:41National arsenals and competing gun demandsNotable Point
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Early...21:27Christmas-tree programs recruit allies but can threaten rival budgetsNotable Point
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat2:33:53Why Turkey markets an uncrewed attack helicopter so heavilyQ&A
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books4:00:14Why defense-industry disruptors rarely stay independentNotable Point
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books4:30:29Missile stocks, factory throughput, and scrap-metal demandNotable Point
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-421:27:56The limits of national control over modern defence supply chainsQ&A
- Tre Kronor Class: Because the Swedish had a lot of Bofors guns to use..7:30Swedish armed neutrality rested on industrial depthNotable Point
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times1:36:48How a six-carrier policy could preserve British naval aviationQ&A
- Some Minor Navies of WWII: Five Problems and How to Fix them January 194019:32Why Sweden could enforce its neutralityNotable Point
- Luigi Cadorna Class: The Regia Marina's Condottieri Part 226:42Armando Diaz's builder and the OTO Melara legacyNotable Point
- Bruships 81: Some Books from Chalk Valley & Tank Fest and Naval History Questions39:54Why the US Navy stayed with the five-inch gunQ&A
- Patreon 56: Why Retire Admirals in a World War? (Live)33:11What Percy Addison did before his wartime recallQ&A
- Patreon 56: Why Retire Admirals in a World War? (Live)35:24Why firms valued retired senior officersQ&A
- Patreon 54: Torpedo development 1900-1939 and it's impact on destroyer design an doctrine2:25:03Spearfish production restarted after a long pauseQ&A
- Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN10:48Australia's uranium wealth does not create a nuclear industry by itselfNotable Point
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN1:20:52The cost of boom-and-bust Australian shipbuildingChapter
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:07:01AW.681, C-130, and the cost of a small fleetQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:14:07Industrial capacity as part of national defenceNotable Point
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)40:52Palmer's shipyard, the Depression, and the Jarrow MarchChapter
- Patreon 45: Comparing Sisters(Not Kardashians) - HMS Renown & Repulse / HMS Nelson & Rodney30:56Q&A: can British warships be built abroad?Q&A
- Adventure (1904) Class: Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)18:10Armstrong's origins and an early conflict-of-interest safeguardChapter
- Adventure (1904) Class: Scout Cruisers (Long Patrol)19:54Armstrong Whitworth's integrated industrial capacityChapter
- 21 Christmas Books for 2021 - Bruships 59: Books & Naval History Chat1:47:34Why Canada converted Britannias for ASWQ&A
- Patreon 37: Interwar RN logistics - The Good, The Bad, and The Singapore5:25Industrial concentration and defence procurementQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (2)3:27:06Why drone leadership depends on mission and scaleQ&A
- Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14): 191520:23Export markets behind naval rivalryNotable Point
- Patreon 24: Everything Wrong With Star Wars Fleets (From a Naval History Perspective)28:03Did designer defections leave the Empire stuck with the TIE?Q&A
- Hawker Aircraft of the 1920s & 1930s30:25How Hawker rebuilt Sopwith's aviation capabilityChapter
- Hawker Aircraft of the 1920s & 1930s37:33Why Sopwith failed after the First World WarQ&A
- Hawker Aircraft of the 1920s & 1930s42:41Tank builders' connections with naval industryQ&A
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War3:35:29Why short-war assumptions hollow out the industrial baseQ&A
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War3:38:19Why the Abrams production line stays activeNotable Point
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi2:28:39A Bofors analogy links engineering independence to integration problemsNotable Point
- Patreon 19: 2nd Tier powers Dreadnoughts: Spain, Austria-Hungary, S.America, Greece & Ottomans2:54:23Why advanced warship exports could fund developmentQ&A
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3b/7 Keith Speed (Continued)20:43Could defence constituencies act as a parliamentary bloc?Notable Point
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed37:23Trafalgar, Invincible, Type 22, and Sting Ray as one ASW systemChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P2/7 Keith Speed44:37Britain's uncrewed undersea vehicle as an industrial shortcutChapter
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:19:16Humberside trawlers as mine-countermeasure hullsNotable Point
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan1:20:20Defense spending as deterrence and skilled employmentNotable Point
- Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan2:42:28Civilian expertise, dockyard accountability, and defence economicsChapter
- The Fairey Story Anew...1:55:33How interwar aircraft prototype competitions workedQ&A
- The Fairey Story Anew...1:58:42Privately funded prototypes put aircraft companies' capital at riskQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 15: Diplomacy & When it Fails, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A35:19Why arms companies do not act as one coordinated blocNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P2b Introduction to Patreon Video 410:12How a Pacific-first war changes British procurementNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A1:47:53Component sourcing and control of Britain's deterrentNotable Point