Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Type 82 Destroyer

Also searchable as Type 82, Type 82 Destroyers.

Related time notes

  1. Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:25:41The Royal Navy's 1959 next-generation missile shipQ&A
  2. Bruships 251: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:57:09Building repeatable carrier and escort groupsNotable Point
  3. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    49:16Type 82 was conceived as a fleet leader and presence shipChapter
  4. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    51:26Two destroyer tiers and a probable division among frigatesNotable Point
  5. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    1:06:21Type 42 added Sea Dart firepower to a larger task groupChapter
  6. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    1:11:54Type 42 picket duty exposed communications and escort problemsNotable Point
  7. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    1:20:12What could a fleet built around Type 82 and CVA-01 have changed?Notable Point
  8. What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)
    9:19CVA-01 leaves a carrier-policy gapChapter
  9. Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)
    45:20Type 83 is expected to exceed Type 82's size and capabilityQ&A
  10. Bruships 240: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:28:04Saving cancelled Cold War ship classesQ&A
  11. Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:07:38Keeping British StanFlex from repeating LCSQ&A
  12. What if the Royal Navy used the Lessons of the 1982 Falklands War to go Stanflex?
    3:39Escort losses and the problem of arming auxiliaries for warNotable Point
  13. Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....
    2:59:33Large destroyer hulls offer room for aviation derivativesQ&A
  14. Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:04:51Extra Type 82 destroyers in the Falklands WarQ&A
  15. Modern Chinese Destroyers: How the Current People's Liberation Army Navy's surface ships came to be
    1:29:46Type 055 presence and Type 052DL massChapter
  16. Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start
    18:36How building CVA-01 would change Britain's next carrier generationQ&A
  17. Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:11:07A Canadian equivalent to a large destroyer leaderQ&A
  18. Scuttlebutt 17: Missiles, Guns & Other Barrels of Fun
    30:53Are mission bays a liability for future destroyers?Q&A
  19. Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)
    2:31:33The full Type 82 promised more than HMS BristolQ&A
  20. Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    2:56:57Type 82, Long Beach and the first TiconderogasQ&A
  21. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    7:57:41A cruiser-scale successor to the Sea Slug County classQ&A
  22. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle
    8:15:20Why a Type 82 concept can be a destroyer or cruiserQ&A
  23. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon
    4:06:35Why another Type 82 might still fail to become a museumQ&A
  24. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War
    2:23:40Why eight Type 82s would not erase the Type 42Q&A
  25. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War
    3:13:08Ticonderoga and Type 82 were not direct equivalentsQ&A
  26. 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War
    5:58:21How fourteen Type 82s could affect later destroyer numbersQ&A
  27. Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:25:34Why Invincible's Sea Dart had no better locationQ&A
  28. Bruships 215 On the Road Japan 2025: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    30:38The Type 82 procurement pinch pointNotable Point
  29. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    36:10Type 82 Bristol paired broad capability with costly omissionsChapter
  30. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    37:13Falklands command disputes had to reach back to BritainNotable Point
  31. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    39:37Ikara extended a ship's anti-submarine reachNotable Point
  32. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    41:11Why cheaper Type 42 comparisons missed Type 82's wider roleNotable Point
  33. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    46:46A fuller Type 82 could have added aviation and layered defenceNotable Point
  34. Darings to Countys... and beyond; How Royal Navy Fleet Destroyer design evolved in the Missile Age
    1:05:06Daring and County armament exposes Type 82's redundancy gapNotable Point
  35. Bruships 208: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:15:23A missile-and-gun cruiser for the imagined 1980s fleetQ&A
  36. Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:30:09A Commonwealth fleet built around larger InvinciblesQ&A
  37. Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:42:58Which recently retired warships deserved museum preservationQ&A
  38. Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:54:45A Commonwealth cruiser for the GIUK gapQ&A
  39. Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    9:13Navies undermined by their own political leadershipQ&A
  40. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    7:00:11A Royal Navy built for strategic autonomy after SuezQ&A
  41. Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...
    1:33:10Cold War destroyers make sense only inside their fleet doctrineQ&A
  42. Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...
    2:19:18Why networks and missiles do not eliminate capital shipsQ&A
  43. Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat
    2:18:38A Royal Navy built around Malta carriers and Neptune cruisersQ&A
  44. Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!
    1:58:45A Royal Navy counterpart to USS Long BeachQ&A
  45. Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered
    3:17:45How a larger Daring class enlarges later destroyersQ&A
  46. Bruships 136: Some Books & Some Questions Answered
    2:33:32Why a cheaper Type 47 could displace the Type 83Q&A
  47. Bruships 130: Battleships
    2:27:34How early gas turbines could reshape Royal Navy escortsQ&A
  48. Bruships 125: Hutchinsons Pictorial History of the War Series
    1:57:15What happens to Type 82 if Neptunes remain command shipsQ&A
  49. Bruships: Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!
    2:34:46Why the Type 82 is called a missed Royal Navy opportunityQ&A
  50. CVA-01: Getting the Ship right and the Politics wrong - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 4
    6:50Type 82 as the carrier force’s missile-age escortNotable Point
  51. CVA-58 USS United States: Range upon Range - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 1
    30:24USS Northampton and CVA-58's missing flagship functionsNotable Point
  52. Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture
    30:55The Type 82's cost was rooted in its scaleQ&A
  53. Ticonderoga Class: Comment Response
    20:56The destroyer that filled an unbuilt cruiser's roleNotable Point
  54. Slava Class: Comment Response
    39:25Why a larger Kirov backup was impracticalQ&A
  55. Bruships 107: Some New to Me Books & Some New from Pen & Sword
    2:54:26Type 82, Ticonderoga, and the politics of cruiser labelsQ&A
  56. Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books
    2:10:45How machinery conversion could extend Type 82 serviceQ&A
  57. Bruships 105: Six Age of Sail Useful Books
    2:11:23What would replace hypothetical Type 82 losses in the Falklands?Q&A
  58. Bruships 100: Science Fiction & Some Fvourites
    45:26A British nuclear cruiser built around Type 82Q&A
  59. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    19:46A Malta carrier force would leave Type 82 close to BristolQ&A
  60. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    25:26A larger Type 82 could combine Sea Dart, a hangar, and IkaraQ&A
  61. Bruships 97: Random Books, Naval Chat & Possibly the Sound of Rain
    3:31:22Missile Counties could push Type 82 into a cruiser roleQ&A
  62. New Years 2023 Naval History Questions till the Bru runs out...
    1:25:38A British nuclear cruiser would scale up familiar air-defense designsQ&A
  63. Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat
    1:15:08Why HMS Bristol survived the Type 82 cancellationQ&A
  64. Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat
    2:55:01A plausible 1980s radar suite for HMS VanguardQ&A
  65. Bruships 92: New Books, Naval Chat and Late 19th Century Warships...
    3:09:45Why Type 82 destroyers might replace the Type 42sQ&A
  66. Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War
    3:55:19Type 82 destroyers and Malta carriers transform the Falklands WarQ&A
  67. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 2
    29:17A Royal Navy built around the full Type 82 classQ&A
  68. Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...
    1:59:40The fleet built around retained CATOBAR carriersQ&A
  69. The Principles and Factors of Cruiser Design(Live)
    1:02:19Was Type 82 a destroyer or a cruiser?Q&A
  70. Battle of Kentish Knock (8th of October 1652)
    3:38:12Which ships could have launched the Sea Gull missile?Q&A
  71. Patreon 33: Amphibious ship development from 1980's to modern day.
    3:05:48CVA-01's paper limits were not the final shipQ&A
  72. British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper
    46:05Falklands signals and the CVA-01 counterfactualChapter
  73. Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)
    2:13:01CVA-01 was planned as the center of a carrier-group systemChapter
  74. Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers
    2:53:33The Falklands force sailed without a cruiserChapter
  75. Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers
    2:55:19County and Bristol performed cruiser functionsQ&A
  76. Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3a/7 Keith Speed (Continued)
    4:04How 18 Sea Dart ships translated into six availableNotable Point
  77. Bruships 34: Random History
    1:58:27Broad-beamed Type 22s, larger Invincibles, and a Type 82 fleet escortQ&A
  78. Bruships 34: Random History
    3:40:50How might Western Cold War fleets better counter the Soviet Navy?Q&A
  79. Town Class Part 7 of 7: Edinburghs & Legacy
    15:06Why frigates and destroyers do not fully replace cruisersChapter
  80. Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War
    1:30:09The fleet built around surviving CVA-01 carriersQ&A
  81. Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers - A live stream
    32:24Escort numbers, crew retention, and deployable readinessChapter