Related time notes
- What happens if France joins the Russo-Japanese war from the beginning?43:33Standard classes and screening make a fleet easier to assembleNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?21:53Construction volume allowed separate specialized hullsNotable Point
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?1:11:46Keeping Agincourt within the fast Queen Elizabeth designNotable Point
- America goes Big Cruiser in the 1930s: Ending the Naval Treaties for the Alaska Class21:28When a separate ship type justifies its production costsNotable Point
- Balancing the Humors: How are modern nations balancing diplomacy and war in the ships they build?2:02:34Shared hulls and national weapon fitsQ&A
- The USN Pre-WWI Destroyers; Never Enough Ordered6:52Bainbridge-class variations complicate the first mass orderChapter
- The USN Pre-WWI Destroyers; Never Enough Ordered36:56Thousand-tonners lead from four-ship batches to 111 WickesChapter
- Modularity Squared... What happens if the Stanflex & Meko combined into a single program?28:53A shared module market lowers entry costs for more naviesNotable Point
- What if the Royal Navy used the Lessons of the 1982 Falklands War to go Stanflex?1:06:31Strict StanFlex interfaces versus the Littoral Combat Ship approachNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:13Why the Royal Navy accumulated so many gun calibresQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:48Annual budgets and the incentive to keep developing gunsNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:12Why a new gun standard left older weapons in serviceQ&A
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:12:09A 15-inch/45 battery for the King George V classQ&A
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)54:37Why an all-Burke fleet is not a complete answerQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:13:21Why destroyer steam pressures laggedQ&A
- Building the Royal Canadian Navy for WWII29:32Flower corvettes became a multinational escort typeNotable Point
- What if the High Seas Fleet was not Scuttled in Scapa Flow?35:42Which German warships were the real prizesChapter
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut19:56Fleet standardization and the New Republic's logistics problemQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut2:09:12The Royal Navy receives hundreds of Gearing-class destroyers in 1940Q&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:38:08Gloriana battleships and the limits of a fictional ship classQ&A
- Bruships 209: Science Fiction Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:26Why battle barge does not identify one Warhammer hull classNotable Point
- Simone Antonio Pacoret de Saint Bon: Father of the Regia Marina4:40French innovation versus fleet standardizationNotable Point
- Mary Rose to Victory: How the Wooden Wall Grew as both forest and trees1:03:15Standardization linked guns, ship plans, and accountabilityChapter
- Mary Rose to Victory: How the Wooden Wall Grew as both forest and trees1:07:13Common ship plans made dockyard performance comparableNotable Point
- From Mary Rose to Victory, How & Why Construction of the Wooden Wall changed... Naval History Live1:16:27Cast-iron cannon change the economics of fleet firepowerChapter
- From Mary Rose to Victory, How & Why Construction of the Wooden Wall changed... Naval History Live1:39:12Ordnance standardization leads toward the EstablishmentsChapter
- From Mary Rose to Victory, How & Why Construction of the Wooden Wall changed... Naval History Live1:51:03A 5.5-inch standard could have reshaped British batteriesNotable Point
- From Mary Rose to Victory, How & Why Construction of the Wooden Wall changed... Naval History Live1:54:18Were Establishments mainly meant to help crews find their way?Q&A
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:04:38Building a Second World War navy around five gun calibersQ&A
- Battle of the Barents Sea: Naval History Live1:28:19Why similar German cruisers lost the benefits of scaleNotable Point
- Battle of the Barents Sea: Naval History Live1:30:10Would more German ships built to one design have gained economies of scale?Q&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:19:41Why triple turrets would give Vanguard twelve gunsQ&A
- How would a Naval Historian Change the Goa'uld Fleet to be supreme? Patreon Premier 78:07Why every lord should not build the same shipNotable Point
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered24:24The Elbonian navy as a warning about incompatible fleetsQ&A
- Check Campaign 16: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:45:42Making the radar refit the next production standardNotable Point
- Patreon 99: What would Imperial Star Destroyers look if designed by 1938 USN, RN, KM, IJN, RM & SN?1:55:34Italian ship individuality and missed production efficienciesNotable Point
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:47:34A third Queen Elizabeth versus two light carriersQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered4:18:58Why one Anglo-American warship standard is difficultQ&A
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 122:30Henderson treats standardisation as a fleet-wide multiplierNotable Point
- HMS Unicorn: Honestly Not An Aircraft Carrier - Key Ship Series 8, Ship 124:24Henderson and Goodall designed for global logisticsChapter
- Check Campaign 2: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:39:15Standardizing the first dreadnought battle lineChapter
- Check Campaign 2: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:49:18Arming a cruiser to support the battle lineChapter
- Check Campaign 2: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign3:45:53Standardization and light-cruiser vulnerability in the battle lineChapter
- Patreon 91: Flower class sloops: The most key ship of the 20th century?3:14:47StanFlex pays off only as a fleet-wide systemNotable Point
- Battle of Sinop(1853): The Death Knell or a Useful Patsy?11:56Why coordinated infrastructure mattered to French naval powerNotable Point
- HMVS Cerberus: KSS1 S4 Comment Response22:50What if Cerberus had become an imperial defence type?Notable Point
- Battle of Empress Augusta Bay(1943): The First Radar Battle?44:04Four Clevelands and eight FletchersChapter
- Battle of Empress Augusta Bay(1943): The First Radar Battle?1:11:27The Japanese scratch force and its command burdenChapter
- Battle of Empress Augusta Bay(1943): The First Radar Battle?1:15:28Why the Japanese formation really was a scratch forceQ&A
- Battle of Empress Augusta Bay(1943)1:11:51Standardized ships and practiced divisions sustained repeated attacksNotable Point
- When does a navy know it is time to replace a type or class of ships? P2/2 Lego enhanced discussion1:21:16Modularity works best with realistic technical ambitionNotable Point
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 948:50Standardizing the battle line around heavy gunsNotable Point
- How & Why during WWII Motor Torpedo Boats(MTBs) became Motor Gun Boats(MGBs): Pacific Theatre1:26:52Good-enough boats versus borrowed perfectionNotable Point
- Scharnhorst Class: The Quality of the Kaiserliche Marine - Key Ships Series 5, Episode 617:03Flagship staffing and uneven machinery resultsNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?2:50:42Italian shipbuilding and inconsistent ammunition standardsNotable Point
- Building the Fleets for the Battle of Midway1:01:24Class labels can conceal standardised destroyer familiesNotable Point
- Steam Battleships (1876-1891)23:11The Admiral class as a development familyChapter
- Queen Elizabeth class battleships - Brave first step, faltering leap or something else?15:03Nevada and Oklahoma machinery splitNotable Point
- Châteaurenault (1898): The French Columbia Class... (19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 9)22:16One-off design culture and the missing torpedo escape weaponNotable Point
- Châteaurenault (1898): The French Columbia Class... (19th Century Cruisers Series 2 Part 9)36:49French raider bases versus one-off boiler logisticsNotable Point
- Edgar(1890) Class: 19th Century Cruisers Part 1028:02Royal Arthur, Crescent, and variation within a cruiser classChapter
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:58:31How a mixed remnant fleet could hobble German naval recoveryQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 22:31:07How a successful naval weapon becomes fleet standardQ&A
- Why the Galaxy Class are Cruisers in 12 minutes...5:13Reserve capacity makes the Galaxy adaptable in warNotable Point
- The Battle of Cape Ecnomus (256BC): Long Patrol36:23The quinquereme as the third-rate of its eraNotable Point
- Battle of Shiloh: a Riverine, if not quite Maritime, confluence of events2:54:31Why an E-class 6-inch twin suited a rebuilt HoodQ&A
- What if Washington allowed more than Nelson & Rodney: A UAD infused discussion (Long Patrol)41:50Modernizing the Queen Elizabeth class for a common speedNotable Point
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:09:19Why a class of Renowns could outperform a mixed fast fleetNotable Point
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:16:54How class commonality makes modernization affordableQ&A
- Inspiration of Theorists: The Maritime & Strategic Lessons of the Seven Years War (1756-63)3:32:55Cape Finisterre and the professional naval legacyNotable Point
- Trafalgar to Dreadnought: A Century in Fifteen Ships and Battles10:42Why the 74-gun ship became a naval standardQ&A
- Trafalgar to Dreadnought: A Century in Fifteen Ships and Battles39:20How the Victorian Royal Navy could afford physical trialsQ&A
- Patreon 32: Japanese heavy cruisers of the 1920s & 1930s, were they worth it?1:11:38Why Japan standardised cruiser machinery earlierQ&A
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean21:13Dupuy de Lôme and the logistics problemChapter
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean29:56Amiral Charner class: cheapening an already cheap strategyChapter
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean33:56A more pragmatic ocean-going cruiserNotable Point
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean37:44Later French armoured cruisers grow largerNotable Point
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean40:48Edgar Quinet finally standardises the batteryChapter
- An Introduction to Armoured Cruisers & the Mediteranean42:56SMS Sankt Georg's mixed-battery burdenChapter
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI1:21:28French standardisation improved only near the type's endChapter
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI2:20:56How long were mixed cruiser batteries defensible?Q&A
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI2:54:52Could light and heavy cruisers share machinery?Q&A
- Patreon 31: Armoured Cruisers in the Mediterranean in WWI2:57:30Why good cruiser plans would not fix a patchwork fleetQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:15:48An Admiral-class carrier conversion alternativeQ&A
- Steel of a Hundred Years Ago: Ships of 19201:26:42USS Tennessee as a balanced standard battleshipChapter
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora29:16Standardized fleets versus French and Russian experimentsChapter
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora34:07Why Germany drew British attention before it had a large fleetQ&A
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora37:34How Britain kept civilian shipbuilding under Admiralty controlNotable Point
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora48:02Mixed ammunition burdens encouraged gun standardizationQ&A
- Patreon 14: The Naval Defence Act of 1889 as proposed by Baile Inneraora2:09:24Why the Royal Navy later moved away from 9.2-inch gunsQ&A
- Bruships 24 - An Autobiography from War1:10:31Which heavy cruiser design would Japan standardise on?Q&A
- An Introduction to My Top 10 Warships (No Tribal, Battle, Daring or Town Classes allowed)18:11USS Winston S. Churchill and a one-size-fits-all fleetNotable Point
- A Name to illustrate a navy - HMS Leander through history58:22Why Britain did not reserve 9.2-inch cruiser turretsQ&A