Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:11:01Hermes for Australia: Harriers determine the valueQ&A
- Bruships 261: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...44:34The F-35B's expected service lifeQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:21:45Sea Control Ships and names based on intended rolesNotable Point
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:37:35Why Hermes could not combine Harrier and commando operations easilyQ&A
- What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?16:00Tailoring Invincible's air groupNotable Point
- Bruships 257: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:03:37Unfinished Centaur hulls as fleet maintenance carriersQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:10:03How keeping HMCS Bonaventure could reshape Canadian doctrineQ&A
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class0:00Yak-38 as the other Cold War V/STOL fighterChapter
- Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class2:20Yak-36 lessons behind Soviet V/STOL developmentChapter
- How Ship Design is a reflection of Navy's attempts to balance technology, strategy and memory...45:25Aviation ships support expeditionary fleetsNotable Point
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)55:18Older battlecarrier proposals are a poor Type 83 modelQ&A
- Would an AUKUS Destroyer make a sensible 3rd pillar for the Australia, UK & US Defence Cooperation?19:00Type 83 and the danger of revolutionary promisesNotable Point
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:23:43The 2010 carrier conversion plan and the Harrier gapChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:53:36Carrier gaps and the Libya lessonChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:56:26Why Harrier versus Tornado was a false choiceNotable Point
- Bruships 231: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...5:04:52Harrier and Sea King capacity on a small sea-control carrierQ&A
- Bruships 228: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:15:09A Talos-and-Harrier conversion of HMS VanguardQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:43:48Modernizing HMS Vanguard with 1980s technologyQ&A
- Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?42:20Why Britain pursued supersonic V/STOL aircraftNotable Point
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers0:00Why a supersonic V/STOL aircraft became so difficultChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers30:53P.1213 and P.1216 carried the supersonic successor into the 1980sChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers42:43F-35B completed a sixty-year search for a Super HarrierNotable Point
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:29Why dispersed STOVL hide sites are harder but not deadQ&A
- Bruships 197: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:44:41Replacing Britain's WE.177 tactical nuclear weaponQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...38:59Why light carriers could operate Skyhawks and Harriers but not Super ÉtendardsQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:27What retaining Harrier and Tornado could have preservedQ&A
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:39:24Do not retire old capability before its replacement arrivesNotable Point
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:50:13Why Harrier could not cover a forty-year carrier lifeNotable Point
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II32:56Would a supersonic Harrier transform the Falklands War?Q&A
- Bruships 177: New Year, same Dr Alex... possibly with new gym membership3:15:47Why a world without Harrier still gives assault ships launch aidsQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:47:03If the F-35B had failedQ&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?3:54:17Without Harrier, the Falklands exposes Britain's carrier gapQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:44:39When a six-ship Invincible class might finally retireQ&A
- Bruships 173: Christmas Books for the History Lover in your life...4:44:27How a case for improving Harriers became a case for retirementNotable Point
- 85% is still a First! The Queen Elizabeth Class Aircraft Carriers...52:49The 2010 CATOBAR reversal and carrier-strike gapChapter
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax1:50:04What 1939 America would do with jet-powered XF5U prototypesQ&A
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:40:54A British fleet-defense fighter after Sea VixenChapter
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....1:48:58Second World War ships for the FalklandsQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....2:24:19Could Indomitable's hangars take Harriers?Q&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:22:15Why a larger Harrier is an incremental Marine Corps gainQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!1:37:45Carrier aviation in a stronger post-imperial CommonwealthQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!2:31:20A supersonic Harrier becomes the P.1154Q&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!3:19:28An Invincible class enlarged by 10,000 tonsQ&A
- Bruships 153: Naval History Questions Answered & Boxes being Packed... still, there are more books!1:35:34A supersonic Harrier and larger Invincible-class carriersQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins1:34:18Italian naval aviation without the fixed-wing restrictionQ&A
- So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 347:16Let deck choice shape independence and interoperabilityChapter
- Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books2:24:04P.1154 cancellation and later supersonic Harrier studiesQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered3:07:32The British path toward a supersonic HarrierQ&A
- Bruships 140 - Patreon Suggestions, Some Interesting Books (Hopefully) & Lots of Naval History Qs!1:23:19A 1960s lift-fan fighter would need intensive pilot controlQ&A
- Conception of Admiral Moffett’s Flight Deck Cruisers & the IJN’s construction of Ryūjō18:30Why cruiser and carrier roles conflictedChapter
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!26:50The wartime Ark Royal reappears during the Falklands WarQ&A
- Bruships(New Years Eve): Naval History Questions answered till the Bru runs out!52:33Clemenceau-class carriers in the FalklandsQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases16:16A more capable Harrier in the FalklandsQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer38:21Canadian Invincible-class carriers and Commonwealth capacityQ&A
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture3:33:21Why a frigate deck is a poor routine base for V/STOL aircraftQ&A
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction43:48Carriers and the danger of robbing one serviceNotable Point
- Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?36:42Kiev's cruiser, command, and aviation rolesChapter
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books3:36:39Why an Iowa-class carrier conversion solves the wrong problemQ&A
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books4:38:45Five force-structure changes for the modern Royal NavyQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 41:23:37Export success could revive a supersonic Harrier successorQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War4:05:14Making Harrier the carrier aircraft was a calculated gambleQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 21:36:38Why ski jumps improve STOVL carrier operationsQ&A
- Largest Naval Battle Ever Fought? The Battle of Cape Ecnomus (256BC)2:30:53Q&A: What prevented Harrier operations from the ship discussed?Q&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...2:40:52P.1154 and HS.1202 paths not takenChapter
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...2:41:58A supersonic Harrier changes the Falklands air warQ&A
- Bruships 71: Hobbs on the Fleet Air Arm in Europe & Other cool books2:19:25A 1970s Renown as a carrier-group command shipQ&A
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What If's till the Bru runs out? (5)1:21:42Single versus twin engines for naval F-35 variantsQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:30:09How east-of-Suez framing shaped the carrier cutChapter
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)4:06:32A proposed Harrier bridge to Queen ElizabethNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 12: New to Me Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:49:23Could an upgraded Harrier replace the F-35B?Q&A
- 50th Live Special: Thank You1:33:42Reserves as a hedge against readiness gapsChapter
- Dream Fleet for the Current Integrated Review A Little Proposal27:11Harrier as a reserve-capability lessonNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:27:00Stored Harriers are not a ready combat forceQ&A
- An Introduction to What was paid for in Blood, in Sweat, in Tears & so much Money... Part 1 of 330:58HMS Ark Royal deters Guatemala over BelizeChapter