Related time notes
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...32:52Project 7: workable machinery and inconsistent fuel capacityChapter
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...35:29Salt water, gun liners and rapid barrel wearNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...43:50Project 7U: unit machinery and persistent variationChapter
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...45:48Assessing the destroyer that the yard actually builtNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...49:28Italian-built Tashkent: speed and endurance from an integrated designNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...51:07Why central control failed to guarantee shipyard standardsNotable Point
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...53:48Tashkent's failed domestic adaptation and the limits of design changesNotable Point
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:16:13The recalled Astute module wiring errorQ&A
- Tragedy & Revenge/Wolfpack... Key Books!44:21Modular production undermined Type XXI and XXIII boatsChapter
- Bruships 223: Naval History & Science Fiction Questions Answered Live...2:13:01An attributed account of inconsistent Ajax hullsNotable Point
- Bruships 222: Naval History Questions Answered Live...26:14Italian propellant bags: equal weight without common compositionQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II1:17:44Six specialists to modernize the Royal Navy in 1905Q&A
- Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:51Why submarine weld quality matters more than a fixed strength percentageQ&A
- Italian Submarines of WWII: Shackled Potential or Victims of Geography?19:26Foca's loss exposes niche-production riskNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!4:01:38Thread forms and surface finishes in electrical fittingsNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!4:07:17Professional responsibility for electrical installation qualityQ&A
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!4:10:21Photographic records and uncertainty about completed wiringNotable Point
- Tōgō Heihachirō: Victor of Tsushima & Japan's Nelson...1:03:09How defective ammunition hollowed out paper strengthNotable Point
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:48:49Could interwar infrastructure and quality control improve Italy's fleet?Q&A
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?1:43:43What design organization changed between Scharnhorst and BismarckNotable Point
- Bruships 174: Ten Days to Christmas... have I got the lights up yet?4:09:38How the Hunt-class scaling error passed reviewQ&A
- Built in Australia: HMAS Castlemaine & the Bathurst Class Corvettes30:02A robust design kept widely built ships operationally consistentNotable Point
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax4:43:43British cannon consistency and charts became strategic advantagesQ&A
- The Backbone of Royal Navy Interwar Aviation, HMS Eagle(1918)! Key Ship Series 6 Ship 71:14:19Malta fighter ferry operations meet stowage and quality-control limitsChapter
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song53:18Why German destroyer problems were not just a stern-design issueQ&A
- Check Campaign 22: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign2:14:17Littorio's problem was ammunition quality controlQ&A
- Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered1:44:20The practical test for IJN cruiser conversionsQ&A
- Curtiss SB2C Helldiver: Impression vs Reality - Key Aicraft Series 1, Aircraft 1051:15Modification churn became a production problemNotable Point
- Check Campaign 10: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:12:37Quality control protects designed ship performanceNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 540:19Reconstruction tradeoffs in ammunition and torpedo defenseNotable Point
- Giulio Cesare: The Lucky Ceasar of the Regia Marina, Key Ships Series 8 – Ship 548:50Fire-control quality undermined by inconsistent Italian shellsNotable Point
- Naval Aviation in 1914: It's Standing Before War Began12:30Cruiser shell use created a quality-control advantageNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty2:16:42Italian gunnery was undermined by shell quality, not aimingQ&A
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 19601:06:53Barrel droop made foundry quality part of fire controlNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?2:50:42Italian shipbuilding and inconsistent ammunition standardsNotable Point
- Governments of the Washington Treaty: What were their priorities?2:55:25Why the Western Front's iron harvest continuesQ&A
- Montana Class, The Bulwarks for the New Battle Line: Key Ship Series 4, Part 222:26Why quality control can defeat a strong designNotable Point
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy20:54Why warship simulations struggle with quality controlNotable Point
- Bruships 118: Unbuilt Battleships, Romans & French Strategic Philosophy20:54A hypothetical Roman battleship still needs industrial disciplineQ&A
- Starting off Franco-Italian Battleship race... come see what a Francisco Caracciolo might have done2:44:27Italian ammunition quality and corrupt contractingNotable Point
- Bruships 111: Random Books of History48:30Italian shell quality was a procurement problemQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:11The counterfactual is shell quality control, not a paint colourChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?24:19Dreyer turns post-Jutland criticism into new shell standardsChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?28:45Why a known shell problem resisted reformNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?36:26The Orion programme offered a peacetime route to better testsNotable Point
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?1:12:46Shell testing also raises the standard for armourNotable Point
- Patreon 74: What if History - Greenboy shells had been developed and deployed in time for Jutland.1:50:08Why replace existing shell stocks?Q&A
- Patreon 74: What if History - Greenboy shells had been developed and deployed in time for Jutland.2:51:01Were faulty fuzes the only British shell problem?Q&A
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers2:11:58Why Admiral Hipper-class displacement variedQ&A
- Major Axis Navies: Five Problems & How to Fix them in January 194015:01Italy's achievable 1940 fixes: shell quality and stockpilesChapter
- Major Axis Navies: Five Problems & How to Fix them in January 193923:42Repairing Italian ammunition quality controlNotable Point
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:34:42Italian ammunition quality as a preventable fleet weaknessQ&A
- Doug Clarke Bruships; As today would have been my Dad's Birthday, it's his books today2:48:37Capitani Romani firepower and Italian quality controlQ&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:14:56Fast-firing guns meet ammunition and maintenance limitsChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (11)3:14:36Why Italian battleship gunnery was inconsistentQ&A
- Operation Tan No.2 (77yrs ago today)52:25Uncertain protection for C6N fuel tanksQ&A
- M29 Class (M33 special, Ep1/2) - Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front: Long Patrol Part 921:18Glatton and the danger of improper magazine insulationNotable Point
- Battle of Taranto: The 81st Anniversary46:23Why Britain did not rely on bombs alone at TarantoQ&A
- Battle of Taranto: The 81st Anniversary55:00What happened to Taranto's missing torpedoes?Q&A
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:27:36How to judge Chinese warship build qualityQ&A
- Bruships 49 Special: 'Questions on ‘Battle Cruisers’ & ‘Dreadnoughts from Around the World (1905-14)1:29:43British shell fuzes and Greenboy quality controlNotable Point
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War1:23:40Range is not the same as reliable North Korean ICBM capabilityQ&A
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects1:11:14Why Type XXI modular production failedChapter
- Battle of Taranto - a Stringbag Strike from the Dark3:18:31The bomb failures found in the debriefNotable Point
- Blackburn Aircraft of the 1920s & 1930s a long patrol (& introduction)58:31Brough endurance tests expose engine faults before flightNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 7: Warship Design Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:34:34Why export-warship problems did not settle the Chinese design questionQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 3: Imperial Japanese Navy Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:50:13Submarine quality control and command culture in the IJNQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 2a: Book Reviews/Q&A50:07Why apparently simple warship upgrades can failQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 1: Book Reviews/Q&A1:12:06Chinese amphibious scale still left quality-control questionsQ&A