Related time notes
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)6:07Why naval technology moved faster than army doctrineChapter
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)7:47Which Civil War observers did European armies listen to?Notable Point
- What happens if instead of Gallipoli, Fisher gets Churchill to go for the Baltic? (Patreon)11:43Why frequent technology adoption could make admirals cautiousNotable Point
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)23:31How bomber doctrine captured the Air MinistryChapter
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:27:50Why frigate and destroyer labels depend on the main missionNotable Point
- Why did Hitler & Mussolini Declare War on America in December 1941? & What if they didn't?1:11:25Early peace costs lessons and changes the monarchyNotable Point
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:15:33Why military experience needs to be kept currentNotable Point
- Bruships 232: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:27:05Why precision weapons can leave total ammunition demand highNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...18:03Could Britain reproduce a US-style Venezuela raid?Q&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...23:53How force structure narrows operational choicesNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...27:31Why familiar air-defense systems are easier to counterNotable Point
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:10:28Britain's early helicopter assault doctrineQ&A
- Talking through the Myths of WWI with @GariusTheBrit2:05:13Interwar armies remembered technology more readily than methodChapter
- Commodore Michael Clapp & the 1982 Falklands War; #2Historians 2025 starts off21:19Fleet Air Arm observers as operational thinkersNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust1:44:36A personal judgment on the Second World War's military legaciesQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 4 of 9 - Fly Navy Heritage Trust2:50:55Separating enduring drone lessons from wartime conditionsQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida3:05:06Douglas Haig as an absorber and administrator of doctrineChapter
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida3:36:05Why European staff systems resembled one anotherQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida4:44:02How repeated attacks sustained the Hundred Days offensiveChapter
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida4:46:12A comparison of British and German tactical flexibilityNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida5:05:25Does World War II have an equivalent to the Hundred Days?Q&A
- Bruships 218: New Books! British Telecom is a terrible ISP! Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:45:49Material calculations in Eastern Front attritionNotable Point
- Destroyer Guns of WWII: Why, Why & Why1:17:31Why advanced doctrine did not mean a fully modernized forceNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:07:55How to make a fictional military force internally consistentQ&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:11:26Why a Byzantine army in Bulgaria should differ from one in the eastNotable Point
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...29:39Was a third strike wave planned for Pearl Harbor?Q&A
- Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...34:17How to read Fuchida's Pearl Harbor accountNotable Point
- Leadership of the Russo-Swedish Wars of the 18th Century(1700-1790)3:48:22Swedish infantry protects an artillery-heavy way of warNotable Point
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:46:24Why Pearl Harbor target priorities did not require a fixed third-wave scriptNotable Point
- Flotillas of the Danube (Continued)1:29:47Shore-to-shore movement and the boundary of amphibious warfareNotable Point
- Ramblings Emergency Broadcast42:08How much did American admiration for Japan matter?Q&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:04:22Why maintain an independent air force?Q&A
- Twitch Live: USA Goes Battlecruiser for all their Capital Ships Campaign 11:39:16Air-power ideas meet logistical realityNotable Point
- Twitch Live: USA Goes Battlecruiser for all their Capital Ships Campaign 11:48:32Tudor weapons need doctrine and delegated executionNotable Point
- Japan's Naval Aviation Doctrine of the 1930s & WWII: Yûgeki Zengen Sakusen!50:48Why limited-war thinking fitted oceans better than mainland campaignsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 25: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:22:40Stopping an enemy is different from driving it backNotable Point
- Check Campaign 25: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:30:14Pairing blocking forces with mobile formationsNotable Point
- Check Campaign 25: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:34:24Why manuals and administration are part of combat powerNotable Point
- Check Campaign 25: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:36:38Generalist formations and the cost of specializationQ&A
- Check Campaign 25: UAD has updated & to Learn it's new ways I started another British Campaign1:42:53Rogal Dorn beyond defensive specializationNotable Point
- Bruships 157: Books so good they've blown the budget on the #ScandiShip24 tour already!2:02:45Joint exercises still require agreement on the lessonsQ&A
- Japanese Naval Aviation Organisation; Going their own way from 19121:27:03Army and navy debate nearly removed Japanese fightersNotable Point
- Bruships 134: Imperial Japanese Navy Books1:31:15British armoured doctrine before the North African campaignNotable Point
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:51:16A British AK-47 would have to fit British fire doctrineNotable Point
- Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...1:57:07More submarines could strengthen Japan's defence perimeterQ&A
- Who killed the Battleship? / Why no more battleships?7:57Why militaries relearn doctrine in warNotable Point
- Mistakes of WWII caused by WWI20:37The small-unit firepower lesson had to be learned againNotable Point
- Patreon 83: What were the most serious mistakes made in WWII based on WWI experience?1:04:43The bomber doctrine that assumed no effective defenceChapter
- Patreon 83: What were the most serious mistakes made in WWII based on WWI experience?1:17:42The danger of expecting another static western frontChapter
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 430:05Motorization did not guarantee strategic readinessNotable Point
- Dominating the World from Second Place: Alfred Von Tirpitz & his 'Risk Fleet' Theory21:28The Boer War sharpened troops for the wrong scale of warNotable Point
- Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture1:44:57Waiting to counterattack as a questionable lesson from World War IQ&A
- How do Navies Learn from War16:27Staff appreciation turns evidence into actionChapter
- Blockading Brest: A Royal Navy Tradition17:09Q&A: Why not integrate the British and French armiesQ&A
- Bruships 98: Steam Engines (both maritime and rail), random & naval questions3:24:14Terrain and deployment decide whether tanks or guns dominateQ&A
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: Soviet Navy 1918-39 & Cruisers of the Reichsmarine & Kreigsmarine22:02Soviet purges erased operational-warfare expertiseNotable Point
- Patreon 70: Germany does not invade Belgium in 1914 - How does this affect RN?18:10The recurring French command-and-control problemNotable Point
- Epic Blunders of Naval History: Comment Response Video3:24Why the Daedalus class behaves like a heavy bomber before a battlecruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 76: Five New Books & a Lot of New Questions57:05Finnish-style territorial defence around RussiaQ&A
- Battle of Shiloh (Long Patrol)38:15Grant's camp system and offensive defenceChapter
- Battle of Shiloh: a Riverine, if not quite Maritime, confluence of events1:06:11Grant's camp philosophy: readiness without entrenchmentNotable Point
- Battle of Shiloh: a Riverine, if not quite Maritime, confluence of events1:13:55Why Roman camps do not disprove Grant's mobility argumentQ&A
- Battle of Shiloh: a Riverine, if not quite Maritime, confluence of events1:17:50Did Grant's camp gamble depend on Johnston?Q&A
- Bruships 67: Cruising on through with Questions & Bru32:25Comparing military innovation across European armiesQ&A
- Strategy & Stragists: An Introduction to Bruships 6310:12Winning battles without winning the warNotable Point
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (7)3:30:02Fortifications persist by adapting to offensive technologyQ&A
- Bruships 55: New Books3:58:40Mechanized for war, but still learning how to use armourNotable Point
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions...43:10French air power, radios, and doctrine in 1940Notable Point
- Crackpot Schemes or Good Ideas (Non-Churchill) – The Comment Questions...49:37Static divisions were not a ready-made mobile reserveNotable Point
- A Book or Two to Review (9): Castle - A History of the Buildings that Shaped Medieval Britain17:01From castle sieges to pitched battlesChapter
- Bruships 50: A D-Day special with Questions & some New Books from Pen & Sword27:15Why D-Day can be described as a giant river crossingNotable Point
- Bruships 42: Some More Scifi4:25:18Massed archery and contrasting fighting traditionsNotable Point
- Bruships 41: A History of Armour & Amphibious Warfare (Kyle Hardman)2:44:45El Alamein and the turn toward cautious armoured warfareChapter
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:15:57Define the British Army's mission before buying equipmentNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:39:32Why special forces cannot replace line unitsNotable Point
- Bruships 36: International Relations2:51:41The missing combined arms in Starship TroopersNotable Point
- Patreon 13: Martin Doherty: What if Gallipoli had succeeded?1:47:33Why Kitchener would not spare an army for GallipoliQ&A
- Four Random Books 13: It's Armoured Warfare Time...12:56Reassessing British armoured doctrineNotable Point
- Four Random Books 13: It's Armoured Warfare Time...16:17Mass requires close infantry-armour cooperationNotable Point
- Patreon 10: “If the Trent affair had gone hot, how badly would it have gone for the US navy?"2:35:59How political memory and doctrine shape tank procurementQ&A
- 1930 London Naval Treaty: An Introduction Part 4 of 5/Articles 14-1624:20Why abandoned military capabilities are hard to restoreNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 20: Brasseys & Janes, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:47:16Why wartime command punishes indecisionNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 17: Fiction & Fraction, Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A27:00Why long-range weapons do not settle every fightNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P6c Introduction to Patreon Video 414:44The heavy-fighter concept before its combat testNotable Point
- 50th Live Special: What, Why & How of Armed Forces…4:25Information runs through every military domainNotable Point
- An Introduction to Falklands Command11:05Why amphibious experience still needed institutionsChapter
- An Introduction to Falklands Command37:19The uncertain provenance of the Falklands command chartNotable Point
- An Introduction to Falklands Command38:20Parallel task groups conflicted with amphibious doctrineChapter
- An Introduction to Falklands Command42:13Clapp and Thompson preserved the working command relationshipNotable Point
- A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii)23:13Was D-Day technically an amphibious operation?Notable Point