Related time notes
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:25German heavy-gun ideas and development timeQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:54:31A prewar British route to wire-guided torpedoesQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live1:30:53Railgun promises and the difficulty of scaling upQ&A
- What happends if you Tigered the Queen Elizabeth Class?46:34Could extra time help the longer 15-inch gun?Notable Point
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:34:24Studying foreign weapons during indigenous developmentQ&A
- Bruships 260: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:36:45OTO's 76 mm gun and claims of originalityQ&A
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?1:24:19When does directed-energy research become usable?Q&A
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?1:36:07Bomb-pumped lasers and the gap between idea and weaponNotable Point
- Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail?1:38:40Were bomb-pumped lasers part of SDI?Q&A
- What happens if WWII took place as scheduled... after 1942? (Patreon)4:58:23Would a later war change the move from guns to missiles?Q&A
- Bruships 254: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:56:21The uncertain progress of cannon-calibre Gauss gunsQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:33:40Red Angel or the rocket-propelled torpedoQ&A
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:43:21Why rocket weapons developed in fits and startsQ&A
- Bruships 241: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:45:01Where to place a pre-missile jet-aircraft boundaryQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:31:42Why British and American automatic cruiser guns developed differentlyNotable Point
- Planning for Pearl Harbor: Decisions to Strike at the USN's mid-pacific base...41:02The shallow-water torpedo planning gapChapter
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…7:02:11Could wartime television guide an assault drone?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P8 of 9 - UAD chat requested design testing…7:05:14Why remote weapons still competed for Allied resourcesQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon8:51:49What China's missile tests revealQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon8:54:34Why advanced arms sales to Iran carry technology-transfer risksQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War26:54How to judge the Mark 27 homing torpedoQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress7:05:05The uncertain evidence for a British 20-inch/54 gunNotable Point
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress7:16:01Why a 20-inch/54 naval gun never became practicalQ&A
- What would the World's Major Navys look like in 1950 if WWII didn't happen? (Live)2:53:08How slowly would weapons develop without wartime urgency?Q&A
- What the Royal Navy thought of Coral Sea, Midway and Leyte Gulf?21:28Midway lessons for fighters, torpedo bombers, and screensChapter
- Torpex: A Short History of it's History...23:11Torpex and the Mark IX torpedo develop togetherChapter
- Bruships 207: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:03Why British destroyers kept the 21-inch torpedoQ&A
- Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?16:37Sweden develops the Bofors for a Baltic defense problemChapter
- Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?32:42The U.S. Navy reaches the Bofors after the 1.1-inch gunNotable Point
- Pom-Pom or Bofors: Which 40mm do you want?1:14:50A proposed mixed octuple mount would combine both 40 mm strengthsNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?8:19How development timing shaped the Bofors advantageNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?11:35Availability and fire control shaped 40 mm procurementNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?30:05The Swedish requirement that produced the Bofors L60Chapter
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?44:17A like-for-like Mark 8 Pom-Pom and L60 comparisonChapter
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:32:19Why were earlier rotary anti-aircraft cannon not implemented?Q&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:48:36What if Britain had jointly modernized the Pom-Pom?Q&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:55:29Why wartime fleets kept mixed fire-control systemsNotable Point
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:58:03Why World War II fire-control comparisons are difficultQ&A
- A Turtle Ship May: Admiral Yi Sun-Sin2:49:05Korean cannon-fired finned dartsQ&A
- A Turtle Ship May: Admiral Yi Sun-Sin2:49:39Why hwacha were risky aboard shipsQ&A
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:30:52Why a corrected T7 .60-calibre gun would still yield to 20 mm cannonQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued15:34Technology perfected too late in the gunship eraQ&A
- Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued18:57Why two British 5-inch gun projects were not direct successorsQ&A
- Battle of Zonchio 1499: Limitations of Command... Venetian Style54:14How early cannon could disrupt a fleet formationNotable Point
- Battle of Zonchio 1499: Limitations of Command... Venetian Style56:28The 72 years between Zonchio and LepantoNotable Point
- Battle of Zonchio 1499: Limitations of Command... Venetian Style57:38How lorries took over cavalry's rapid deployment roleNotable Point
- Battle of Zonchio 1499: Limitations of Command... Venetian Style59:26How cannon inherited the ram's ship-killing missionNotable Point
- Bruships 181: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:51:50Armstrong's claim to build a 21-inch gunQ&A
- The Battlecruiser/Fast Battleship Differential & Soviet Carriers: Scuttlebutt 71:20:45Lion gun development could improve Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
- Bruships 169: Kalax o Kalax, my kingdom for a Kalax...58:11The early US 6-inch dual-purpose gun was ahead of its timeQ&A
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat3:53:52Soviet aircraft claims and American design targetsNotable Point
- Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat3:55:44Turbine metallurgy and repeatable aircraft performanceNotable Point
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:31:08Why the German twin heavy-Flak idea needs a variantQ&A
- How would a Naval Historian Change the Goa'uld Fleet to be supreme? Patreon Premier 718:27Put weapons research before fleet expansionChapter
- How would a Naval Historian Change the Goa'uld Fleet to be supreme? Patreon Premier 720:41Create a protected class of researchers and merchantsNotable Point
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins1:10:09Why an eighteen-inch gun has no clean development priceQ&A
- Bruships 148: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & June Patreon Vote Begins2:55:24Why wonder weapons disappoint in peer warfareNotable Point
- Bruships 146: Naval History Questions, Boxes Getting Packed & Lego Getting Built2:37:24Why a Japanese 40 mm gun has no fixed development timelineQ&A
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London1:50:50A new 15-inch gun offers an alternative to Nelson's armamentNotable Point
- Patreon 100: Stalin's 1930 London Treaty - the USSR joins the Naval Treaties at London2:39:58One duplex mechanism behaves differently across launch platformsNotable Point
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered2:02:31What makes a twin 5-inch mount time-consumingQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered3:31:50Why the ten-gun pom-pom was a poor bluffQ&A
- Sopwith Cuckoo: The Exodus Chapter for Naval Aviation - Key Aircraft Series 1 Aircraft 246:15Why early aerial torpedoes skipped, dived, or broke apartChapter
- Unrotated Projectiles to Hypersonics: Some History & thoughts on Missiles as part of navies35:05Scramjets and railguns face a production-scale materials testNotable Point
- Unrotated Projectiles to Hypersonics: Some History & thoughts on Missiles as part of navies38:02Treat missile performance claims as sales claimsNotable Point
- Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty3:42:27Would larger cruisers change the fast-firing 6-inch gun's timing?Q&A
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 440:36H-42's gun existed ahead of its factoryNotable Point
- H Class Battleships: Ignoring Reality for Perfection, Key Ships Series 4, Ship 458:40Commissioning was not operational readinessNotable Point
- Lion Class: Key Ships Series 4, Part 112:39Why weapons research still needs practical spin-outsNotable Point
- Testing Sixteen Autoloaded 14in Gun Battleship (Chatfield's Dream) to Destruction1:49:01Why better small guns do not end the calibre raceQ&A
- Bruships 115: Hopefully Australia Trip in Summary!1:56:53British 18-inch-gun work gave later designers a head startNotable Point
- Bruships 106: Song Dynasty & Three New Books from Pen & Sword1:27:29Liquid-propellant guns remained hazardous experimentsQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells Today; Alternate History, What if British Shells at Jutland Work?18:05Shellite trades some explosive power for stabilityNotable Point
- The Submarine Century? How Submarines evolved over the 20th Century1:45:11Postwar designs and the foundations of nuclear submarinesChapter
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War33:57An early 17-pounder still needs a tank able to carry itQ&A
- Bruships 89: New Books (Christmas Recomendations) & Personal Accounts of War3:40:05The 15-inch Mark I succeeded by evolving proven workQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 316:42A low-tech solution for stable aerial torpedo entryQ&A
- Tre Kronor Class: Because the Swedish had a lot of Bofors guns to use..10:50How the Bofors 40 mm grew from the Vickers pom-pomNotable Point
- Patreon 54: Torpedo development 1900-1939 and it's impact on destroyer design an doctrine29:18Shaped charges and torpedo warheads developed in parallelQ&A
- Patreon 54: Torpedo development 1900-1939 and it's impact on destroyer design an doctrine1:21:04Why a wonder weapon remains a theoryNotable Point
- Battle of the Atlantic (Original): Comment Response11:06Project Habakkuk tests the 'crackpot' labelNotable Point
- Battle of the Atlantic (Original): Comment Response17:03A Habakkuk demonstration nearly wounds Admiral KingNotable Point
- Bruships 46: Accounts of Naval War2:32:56Was Sea Wolf unreliable in the Falklands?Q&A
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...35:56Why Tempest was still too early for a firm verdictQ&A
- Bruships 40: Favourite Books to Use When Writing...4:13:14Allied experimental weapons extended beyond familiar projectsQ&A
- Bruships 27: Science Fiction Books3:24:25Why Starfleet needs fighters and uncrewed systemsNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 14: Special & Covert Operations Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A1:45:42Why a twin 5-inch mount would be expensive for BritainQ&A