Topic

V/STOL Aircraft

Also searchable as Vertical Short Takeoff And Landing, Vertical/Short Take-Off and Landing Aircraft, Vstol, VSTOL Aircraft.

Related time notes

  1. What if Britain joined with Australian & Canada to build a 'Maximum' Invincible Class instead?
    25:18V/STOL aircraft and catapult airframe loadsNotable Point
  2. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    0:00Yak-38 as the other Cold War V/STOL fighterChapter
  3. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    2:20Yak-36 lessons behind Soviet V/STOL developmentChapter
  4. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    7:29How the Yak-38 generated lift and controlled its hoverNotable Point
  5. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    10:03What the Yak-38's SAU-36 automatic controls didNotable Point
  6. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    12:45Yak-38 thrust, payload and rangeNotable Point
  7. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    16:04Why compare the Yak-38 with Sea Harrier 2?Notable Point
  8. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    21:34Yak-38 testing delays and flight-crew shortagesChapter
  9. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    26:04Yak-38 accidents, serviceability and withdrawalChapter
  10. Yak-38 Forger: The Nasty Surprise of the Kiev Class
    44:02A larger Kiev air group and a better Yak-38Notable Point
  11. What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)
    1:01:38Could Eurofighter become a V/STOL naval aircraft?Q&A
  12. What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)
    1:10:09Could a better V/STOL Invincible stay under 25,000 tons?Q&A
  13. What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)
    2:12:07Does a ski jump prevent conventional aircraft use?Q&A
  14. What Happens if Australia, Canada & the UK go all in on the Invincibles in the 1970s? (Patreon Live)
    2:24:17Would the Commonwealth develop a fixed-wing V/STOL AEW aircraft?Q&A
  15. Special Catch Up Ramblings on Behalf of @TheFleetOfOceans
    2:14:55Big-wing Harrier naval tradeoffsQ&A
  16. Scuttlebutt 12: Not Pocket Battleships, No Guadalcanal and a load of Submarine Signals?
    42:20Why Britain pursued supersonic V/STOL aircraftNotable Point
  17. Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:50:35Why V/STOL payload penalties are not only about weightQ&A
  18. Bruships 200: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    4:27:54P.1154 naval fighter versus the F-4 PhantomQ&A
  19. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    0:00Why a supersonic V/STOL aircraft became so difficultChapter
  20. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    7:41BS100 thrust promised performance at a control costNotable Point
  21. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    13:34Rolling V/STOL launches for Cold War fleet defenseChapter
  22. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    23:09NATO pursued V/STOL to escape vulnerable fixed air basesChapter
  23. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    26:17NBMR-3 prompted a wide field of British V/STOL designsChapter
  24. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    28:11CVA-01 sat apart from Britain's V/STOL industrial strategyNotable Point
  25. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    28:48Decades of V/STOL research became a British industrial advantageNotable Point
  26. Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers
    30:01V/STOL funding survived governments that cut other researchNotable Point
  27. Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    32:05Why a 1970s Leviathan refit becomes a new-ship argumentQ&A
  28. Santa's Sleigh... A Quick History - Key Aircraft Series 3, Aircraft 3
    3:49Santa's sleigh treated as a V/STOL delivery systemChapter
  29. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    6:19:22A British supersonic V/STOL fighter would raise the bar for F-35BQ&A
  30. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    7:54:02V/STOL offers the fastest emergency route back to seaQ&A
  31. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    8:01:59CATOBAR remained preferable while Britain could sustain itQ&A
  32. @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 1
    1:47:32Use V/STOL fighters to launch air defense fasterNotable Point
  33. @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 1
    1:49:29Merchant ships as distributed fighter basesNotable Point
  34. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    52:35Why unlike carrier designs can all be good valueQ&A
  35. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    1:22:15Why a larger Harrier is an incremental Marine Corps gainQ&A
  36. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    1:37:45Carrier aviation in a stronger post-imperial CommonwealthQ&A
  37. Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!
    2:31:20A supersonic Harrier becomes the P.1154Q&A
  38. Bruships 163: I need a Kalax Kalax, a Kalax is what I need! Naval History Questions & Chat
    3:49:26Sea Harrier payload and range against the Yak-38 ForgerNotable Point
  39. War Emergency Carriers of WWII... Lessons for future procurement?
    51:35A modern emergency carrier starts with industrial choicesChapter
  40. Scuttlebutt 2: H Class Battleships, Japanese Carrier Aircraft Design and lots more
    34:49A common V/STOL flight-deck fleet for BritainNotable Point
  41. Bruships 152: Patreon July Premiers Announcement, Special Guests & Naval History Questions Answered
    3:22:55A successful P.1154 would reshape, not save, CVA-01Q&A
  42. Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion
    28:13Aircraft growth drives carrier and air group tradeoffsChapter
  43. Evolution of Carrier Air Groups 1918-2024: A Discussion
    41:36Common aircraft can turn several flight decks into a flexible forceNotable Point
  44. The Drivers of the Evolution of Carrier Air Groups...
    45:40Strike aircraft grew into much larger systemsNotable Point
  45. The Drivers of the Evolution of Carrier Air Groups...
    1:13:15Was the US sea control ship concept ever built?Q&A
  46. So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 3
    40:53Match the flight deck to aircraft and operational aimsChapter
  47. So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 3
    47:16Let deck choice shape independence and interoperabilityChapter
  48. So You Want to Build an Aircraft Carrier: Design! Part 1 or 3
    1:32:13Test Britain's STOVL force against the strategic checklistChapter
  49. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    1:59:22A Sea Control Ship requirement for P.1154Notable Point
  50. Bruships 142: Naval History Questions & Some Books
    2:35:26How a successful P.1154 could reshape carrier aviationQ&A
  51. Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered
    3:07:32The British path toward a supersonic HarrierQ&A
  52. Bruships 138: Random Naval History Books from Me, Random Naval History Questions from You!
    2:30:10How a supersonic Harrier could enlarge the Invincible classQ&A
  53. Patreon Bonus: Battle Cruisers & Battleships are separate Categories in the Washington Naval Treaty
    3:54:34What if Britain had access to the Sea Harrier II?Q&A
  54. Bruships 119: Cool Books - but they're definitely a Mixture
    3:33:21Why a frigate deck is a poor routine base for V/STOL aircraftQ&A
  55. Kara Class: Comment Response
    8:15Yak-38 and Blackburn Blackburn: looks versus utilityQ&A
  56. Kara Class: Comment Response
    14:11Why the Yak-38 faced a harder problem than a conventional carrier aircraftQ&A
  57. Kara Class: Comment Response
    17:13Cold War airfield vulnerability behind British V/STOLNotable Point
  58. Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 4
    1:23:37Export success could revive a supersonic Harrier successorQ&A
  59. Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...
    2:41:58A supersonic Harrier changes the Falklands air warQ&A
  60. Aircraft Carriers of the 1920s & 1930s
    2:35:42Angled flight decks followed higher aircraft landing speedsQ&A
  61. Patreon 11: "The effect of the early jet age on naval warfare strategy/tactics?"
    2:04:18Russia's abandoned V/STOL carrier routeQ&A
  62. Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation
    1:45:30Could modern VSTOL aircraft revive escort carriers?Q&A
  63. Bruships 25 - Some More Naval Aviation
    1:57:50Why civilian carrier conversions wait for a major warQ&A
  64. An Introduction to "Flying Boats & Seaplanes; Mothered by Capability or Necessity?" P3/4 WWII (Q)
    5:56The postwar appeal of water-based fightersNotable Point