Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Giuk Gap

Related time notes

  1. Britain's Cold War Destroyers: Logically Building for the War they didn't Fight...
    54:11Collective security did not erase Britain's own naval tasksChapter
  2. Bruships 191: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:54:45A Commonwealth cruiser for the GIUK gapQ&A
  3. Bruships 178: Naval History or Exercise
    1:46:49Greenland, Arctic basing, and the GIUK gapQ&A
  4. Anti Submarine Warfare, a primer history & overview
    1:09:38IUSS, SOSUS, and mobile towed-array surveillanceChapter
  5. Jellicoe as 3rd Sea Lord, Essay Competion & WoW Collab: Last 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 4/4
    5:08:40A 1970s war around the GIUK GapQ&A
  6. Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/4
    7:58:39Why a secret Cold War submarine sinking is hard to concealQ&A
  7. So what happens in the Pacific if Italy stays neutral for WWII?
    27:17A different fate for the French fleetNotable Point
  8. Through Deck Cruisers: The Kiev & Invincible Classes of Aircraft Carrier
    25:20The GIUK gap as a North Atlantic surveillance lineNotable Point
  9. Through Deck Cruisers: The Kiev & Invincible Classes of Aircraft Carrier
    26:36Invincible's Royal Navy missions around the GIUK gapChapter
  10. Agamemnon was not alone: The Ardent Class Third Rate 64s - Key Ships Series 8, Ship 10
    1:23:26Type 83, air defense, and the cost of specializationNotable Point
  11. Bruships 133: Questions till the Bru runs out...
    1:04:44Fixed hydrophone defenses predate SOSUS and the world warsQ&A
  12. Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?
    1:23:18Britain blocked the Iceland route but still depended on patrol disciplineNotable Point
  13. Operation Berlin: Tour De Force or Tour De Farce?
    1:32:35Tovey reinforced the Iceland blocking forceNotable Point
  14. Sea Power of the Cold War: When Strategy got overwritten by Technology and Week Planner
    41:26Sea sovereignty and the promise of the GIUK barrierNotable Point
  15. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    14:11Setting a conventional 1980 GIUK Gap warChapter
  16. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    22:18The unglamorous infrastructure behind GIUK defenceNotable Point
  17. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    33:20Why heavy reinforcement still has to cross by seaChapter
  18. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    37:25A broad transit route rather than a narrow straitNotable Point
  19. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    45:43The northern flank before the Cold WarChapter
  20. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    47:58What Red Storm Rising teaches about losing IcelandNotable Point
  21. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    55:56Soviet bastions and the two-way GIUK GapChapter
  22. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    1:01:13Turning SOSUS contacts into a shared operating pictureNotable Point
  23. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    1:19:43Submarine posture creates dilemmas before warChapter
  24. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    1:38:31Ballistic-missile reach and nuclear ambiguityNotable Point
  25. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    1:55:46How the Norwegian Sea campaign might unfoldChapter
  26. Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 1980
    2:01:47The GIUK Gap as a two-way strategic funnelNotable Point
  27. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    21:49The GIUK approaches mattered before the Cold WarChapter
  28. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    36:14Why the GIUK Gap is a strategic transit routeChapter
  29. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    39:27Iceland and the Second World War origins of GIUK strategyChapter
  30. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    45:59Would NATO cover the GIUK Gap with lines of sonobuoys?Q&A
  31. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    54:04How SOSUS evolved into a North Atlantic surveillance networkQ&A
  32. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    59:07Why the GIUK Gap remains strategically importantChapter
  33. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    1:06:34How do GIUK defences constrain NATO as well as Russia?Q&A
  34. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    1:14:06SOSUS, sonobuoys, and maritime patrol aircraftChapter
  35. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    1:18:16Why do maritime patrol aircraft still need long range?Q&A
  36. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    2:09:44How map projections change the apparent strategic problemNotable Point
  37. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    2:48:18Bear-F reconnaissance through the GIUK air screenNotable Point
  38. Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)
    3:15:07Could a northern offensive split NATO's response?Chapter
  39. Soviet Navy Part 3/3: 1965-1991 - Trying to Win Cold War before it turned Hot?
    6:05Why the late Soviet Navy was builtChapter
  40. Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?
    1:57:08The Atlantic campaign without French U-boat basesChapter
  41. Patreon 62: What If The French Navy in 1940 Fought On?
    2:11:38Could Germany rely more on merchant raiders?Q&A
  42. The Sinking of HMS Rawalpindi, 23rd of November 1939; Long patrol
    33:32The Northern Patrol and the Greenland-Iceland-UK approachesChapter
  43. Shipbuilding trends of the 1880s-1950s: Long Patrol Part 9/11 Building for Victory
    18:28Falklands improvisation exposed a Cold War repair gapNotable Point
  44. Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper
    1:45:26Royal Navy carriers in NATO's Atlantic war planChapter
  45. Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper
    2:25:33Cold War nuclear assumptions and carrier debateChapter
  46. Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper
    2:49:51Why CVA-01 numbers depended on Britain's strategyNotable Point
  47. Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?
    19:43The GIUK Gap and the Soviet bastion problemChapter
  48. Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?
    1:27:16Los Angeles boats attack forward while diesel boats guard the gapNotable Point
  49. Patreon 22: If the Cold War went hot in 1986 would NATO's navies keep the Altantic Going?
    2:25:19Soviet submarines could favor the Greenland-Iceland routeNotable Point
  50. Patreon 17 "The Royal Navy’s Strategic Role in 1980s NATO" as suggested by Joseph Sullivan
    1:14:22US-Royal Navy cooperation around the GIUK gapQ&A