Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Three permitted replacements would favor retiring slower Fuso- and Ise-class ships while preserving the Kongos' greater development potential.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
A measured five-battleship program over six years could exploit low costs and idle capacity rather than crowd out the rest of the fleet.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Japan's weaker ability to expand production quickly gave it an industrial reason to prefer limited, continuing battleship construction.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Retaining the proposed 15-inch/50 armament saves weight in the ammunition, barrels, and handling equipment of a treaty-limited battleship.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Design bureaus could detect implausible specifications, but the treaty system aimed to contain cheating within a known band rather than secure literal precision.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Five early-1930s, 28-knot ships carrying nine 15-inch guns would replace the R class and extend F3 priorities into a new King George V class.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Concurrent new construction could make deep Queen Elizabeth-class machinery rebuilds cheaper and leave Britain with an almost uniformly fast capital fleet.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Five early 28-knot battleships could give the US Navy more experience combining fast capital ships with carriers.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
The earlier Lexington and South Dakota weapons must be distinguished from the later 16-inch/50 used in the design comparison.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Repeated names invite comparisons across generations, but the fortunes of Dreadnought and Prince of Wales do not follow a consistent pattern.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Italy could pursue a Littorio-like 15-inch ship earlier, while France might turn its available tonnage into several 28-knot ships with quadruple 13-inch turrets.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Resumed battleship construction could encourage more carriers, bring Soviet Project 21 forward, and weaken the Deutschland class's advantage in speed.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Inherited names and martial associations can shape the expectations crews have of themselves and their role.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Earlier British, American, and Soviet construction drives further German and Japanese demands and makes the road to World War II highly uncertain.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Earlier British rearmament strengthens political confidence, while a German turn to submarines invites a predictable mass response in treaty-exempt escorts.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Late-1930s Australia had at least a couple of docks able to support major warships, with more heavy infrastructure than survived later postwar rationalization.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Formal American non-alliance in Europe coexisted with naval cooperation from the mid-1920s against a possible war with Japan.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
The League could act only when major members were willing and able to enforce its decisions, while the United States never joined.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Nelson's belt had heavy, full-dreadnought coverage, although no numerical height is supplied.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Earlier carrier command could shift interservice politics toward acquiring aircraft and support an imperial production network around Ceylon.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Diesels allow only a modest gain; a major speed increase requires steam machinery and therefore a substantially different internal and armament layout.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
At a 25-ship British and American ceiling, Japan receives 15 ships under 5:3 but about 18 under the desired 10:7 ratio.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Engine production in Ceylon could support a wider industrial hub and shorten supply routes to the North African campaign.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Britain's base chain and port-to-port presence missions make extreme endurance less valuable than speed or protection bought with the same displacement.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
The planned defense combined submarines, regional forces, and trained ground troops, but Mediterranean and North African demands stripped away key assets.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
British responsibility in the Indian Ocean put the Royal Navy against Japanese, German, and Italian submarines operating from the Malayan region.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
British ships operated along an overseas base chain and up Asian seas, while American forces needed the endurance to cross the Pacific.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Canada received armament up to the level its government was willing to finance.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
British reluctance to adopt convoys is offered as a reason American resources mattered particularly in World War I.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Formal neutrality did not prevent American arms trading, and after US entry the material relationship also ran in the other direction.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
A discussion of imperial infrastructure turns to Cold War influences on historical interpretation, personal conversations, and the limits of expertise in colonial administration.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Earlier large cruisers are a possible consequence of the altered building programs, subject to continuing treaty restrictions.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Personal design preferences include Malta and Midway carriers, Daring-class destroyers, and heavily armed battleships built in Ultimate Admiral: Dreadnoughts.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Britain's existing steam infrastructure made turbines the economical choice, though a later boiler design freeze could have improved efficiency.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
A 1799 role-playing scenario produces a large, fast single-gun-deck frigate, with British armament favoring long guns for range.
From Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design... ·
Russia's inland fuel routes feed sea transfers, but aging river tankers have structural limits when pushed into exposed waters.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Two different assessments of canal vulnerability and escalation show why attacks on fuel routes could widen the war against merchant shipping.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
A proposed explanation links apparent maintenance differences among Russia's Kilo-class submarines to political command appointments.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
A reading of Mahan beyond decisive battle places trade, transport, and the protection of maritime commerce at the center of sea power.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Moving two armored divisions from Europe to Dammam in weeks illustrates the scale of Gulf War sealift.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
The grounding of USNS Big Horn shows how losing one oiler can disrupt a carrier group and force improvised commercial support.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Amphibious ships can retain useful transport capacity for decades, supporting forces ashore and disaster relief without the upgrade demands of front-line escorts.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Japanese carrier mobility, early US Pacific operations, and the Falklands task force demonstrate how fuel determines a fleet's actual reach.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
The Royal Navy's global carrier deployments show how operational tempo and steaming distance can consume service life and force postwar replacement.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Enterprise's return from Wake and the loss of Lexington's assigned oiler show how fuel availability could constrain or cancel an operation.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Flags of convenience and multinational ownership complicate naval protection while Houthi attacks divert trade around Africa.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
The Houthi campaign becomes a case study in regional power, practical statecraft, and the economic consequences of imperfect defense.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·
Even highly effective missile defence may leave enough risk to raise insurance costs, divert shipping, and reduce Egypt's Suez Canal revenue.
From Prof Mercogliano & Dr C Discuss What is going on with Logistics(Shipping)? #2Historians Ep 5 ·