When a doomsday threat loses its force
People who have already accepted the risk of death may remain unmoved by a more destructive threat.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
People who have already accepted the risk of death may remain unmoved by a more destructive threat.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A qualified recollection about Hong Kong raises the question of how inherited administrative rules expand officials' options.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Seven are recalled as belonging to the later period and eleven larger rings to an earlier one, but the chronology is explicitly uncertain.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A plan to destroy only infected worlds faces the requirement to eliminate every surviving spore.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Halo Array's destructive power does not make the Flood susceptible to deterrence.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The surviving Daleks would probably fight among themselves.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Scottish independence example raises a question about politicians' incentives to solve the problems they campaign on.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
None comes to mind as a durable deterrent; brief success is allowed but judged of limited use.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
It would be an experience one would not want repeated; its classification remains undecided.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
With few alternatives, piloting a ship into the machine and escaping by transporter was a workable plan.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Joint purchasing could make expensive resurfacing machinery affordable, but councils still have to agree on buying and using it.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A recollection of Surrey refuse-vehicle purchasing shows how holdouts can frustrate fleet standardization.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A balanced strategic deterrent is excluded because the threats are reciprocal.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Accounting rules can demand repayment over a much shorter period than the infrastructure's useful life.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A favorable first strike might give the group a chance; without one, it could face serious trouble.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Demat Gun removes a target from time and space, while the Crucible carries a bomb with a much wider effect through time.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A storm attack can overwhelm an opponent while leaving the attacker little control over its damage.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
They are classed as strategic weapons because equivalents are recalled elsewhere in their settings.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Galaxy Gun, qualified by a wish for better design and more examples of the weapon.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Design documents and physical compromises can reveal a navy's priorities more clearly than public claims about a new ship.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
The Comandanti Medaglie d'Oro design exposes the compromises of the Soldati class and the cost of favouring other parts of the Italian fleet.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Greater displacement supported heavier guns, torpedoes, mines, and depth charges, although the full mine and depth-charge loads could not normally be carried together.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
The 135 mm weapon promised heavier shells and useful elevation, while a Tribal-class destroyer would probably retain the advantage in volume of fire.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Italian interwar destroyers suited offensive screening better than sustained convoy protection, prompting a larger wartime successor.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
A critical assessment contrasts capable captains and middle-ranking officers with politically connected admirals, while noting that Mussolini held the naval ministry.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
The first pair were laid down in December 1942, further ships followed in 1943, and only one hull is said to have been launched in 1944.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Soldati construction ended in April 1941, yet empty slips waited until December 1942 for a new destroyer design while Capitani Romani cruisers continued in construction.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
A displacement and gun-mount comparison suggests that the material committed to three light cruisers might have produced more than five destroyers for service in more locations.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
More beam and cleaner firing arcs promised steadier gunnery, while heavier anti-aircraft weapons answered contested skies and the 135 mm battery suited close destroyer fighting.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Official explanations may sell a programme or conceal its operating priorities, so physical design choices deserve separate scrutiny.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Benchmark navies may set a deceptively low standard, while smaller fleets can magnify quality claims to support exports and offset inferior numbers.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Claims that two very late hulls reached four percent completion may refer to materials at the yard or later scrapping records rather than completed ship structure.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
The later proposal combined a fifth main gun, concentrated light anti-aircraft weapons, sonar, directors, and Gufo radar in a more complete fleet screen.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Similarities with foreign destroyers may reflect Italian debate and observation, while wartime experience exposed the limits of Mediterranean specialisation.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Allied submarines imposed a continuous Mediterranean threat that helps explain the proposed destroyer's large depth-charge capacity.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Five single 135 mm guns preserved screening firepower, while twin mounts could have freed more deck space for anti-submarine stores.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Destroyers pressing or stopping torpedo attacks benefited from concentrated forward fire rather than an even fore-and-aft distribution.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Concentrated 37 mm and 20 mm batteries accompanied a scarce Italian radar that helped Scipione Africano detect, range on, and destroy a British torpedo boat.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Early radar should first be judged by whether it worked reliably, rather than by the capabilities of systems developed decades later.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Familiar Parsons-derived turbines and three-drum boilers were intended to produce 60,000 shaft horsepower, with limited machinery separation accepted as a survivability compromise.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Orders for the planned class were spread among capable Italian yards, while the design remained late and constrained by prewar weapons choices.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Compare a ship's physical form with official statements, then ask whether the claims guided the design or were written to justify it.
From What the unbuilt destroyers of the Regia Marina tell us about WWII? ·
Tachyon relays, mines and a ready screening force would give a Starfleet base warning and time to react to cloaked attackers.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Earth Spacedock's lack of weapons prompts competing arguments about civilian control and the distribution of military force.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Spare reactor production does not remove the shipyard bottleneck in building complete AUKUS submarines.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Destroying Pandora would remove a dangerous Azur Lane opponent, but more immediate threats could take priority.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Exposed propulsion and three-dimensional broadsides would make sail handling, coordination and maintenance central to a space battle.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Praetors could perform judicial duties, substitute for consuls and receive provincial assignments.
From Bruships 259: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·