The Death Star concentrates a huge investment
The book version of Thrawn is judged unlikely to support so much spending on one fixed asset.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
The book version of Thrawn is judged unlikely to support so much spending on one fixed asset.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A medieval time-travel example puts durable state infrastructure ahead of imported military technology.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Hyperspace missiles offer distant, adjustable strikes, while concentrating the weapon in one asset leaves it vulnerable.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A planet-eating machine raises the problem of control after its makers or crew are gone.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Crew placement and an external breaker illustrate the control measures a powerful weapon needs.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Using an energy web as a barrier raises a traffic problem, although viewers challenge this simplified account.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Genesis Device illustrates the hazard of concentrating a planet-changing capability in one system.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Energy filaments enclose a vessel, and the sealed web becomes self-generating, preventing escape and obstructing outgoing fire.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The smaller Xindi strike causes damage while revealing the danger before the planned larger attack.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Dakara's galaxy-wide reach raises questions about access to its exposed installation and control after its first use.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A proposed mobile Dakara weapon could strike Wraith-held worlds, but it would kill their other inhabitants too.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A comparison with Warhammer's Chaos gods turns on the different roles that followers' belief plays.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Enough persistent debris would crowd orbital space, especially where orbital decay does not remove it.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The public rationale recalled is fear of a slippery slope, while the identity of any system placed in orbit remains unknown.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Tentatively yes, although using them and declining to use them both create strategic problems.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Checks against war games, exercises, real events, and history can expose problems in prolonged theoretical debate.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A scenario can establish its divergence from history while leaving later events to the war game.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Yes, it is judged to be on that scale.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Core-drilling missiles in Babylon 5 raise a speculative question about protecting their electronics.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Supergate is strategic movement infrastructure, comparable to a major wormhole route.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Babylon 5's self-replicating machines prompt a concern about errors accumulating as they multiply.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Secrecy could slow construction and restrict the yards and defenses available to the project.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The recalled estimates understated Yamato's armament, while intermediate judgments could distort good photographic analysis.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Intelligence needs expert context, while repeated repackaging can separate leaders from the original information.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The device claim is unverified; a laboratory demonstration alone does not establish reliable military operation.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Phasers or phased lasers offer immense power, and transporter systems also raise concerns about destructive potential.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Vanguard, because her size suggests room for the conversion.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The cost of the AI infrastructure is considered beyond the available government budgets.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Existing electronic warfare and naval guns could help against small drones while laser systems mature.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
They resemble ship-carried nuclear arms, with other powers able to possess equivalents.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A claim that a nuclear explosion could transfer all its energy into a laser beam meets a materials objection.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Pacific War battle names such as Philippine Sea, Iwo Jima, or Okinawa are suggested, with an admiral's name also possible.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Yes, with their performance judged poor.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
An anti-Wraith device also makes the gate network hazardous for its users.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Atlantis's defences are compared with a ship relying on one missile type for every threat.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Repeated attacks during a major war justify adding weapons and spreading power modules and reserves around the ship.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Replicators rebuild after a devastating strike and retaliate against Atlantis.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
An immense new power source ends in a solar-system-scale disaster in Stargate.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The survivor would still threaten everyone else and would emerge stronger.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The Daleks' Reality Bomb would spread destruction through time and parallel universes.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A film's supposed F-22 is criticized for hovering and having the wrong tail arrangement.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A single Dalek hub joins fleet operations to the Reality Bomb's deployment.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Firing the rings would kill sentient life across the galaxy to starve the Flood.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
The scale of ring and Ark construction prompts a debate about other ways to fight the Flood.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Their failure is acknowledged, while the proposed alternative favors simpler, effective machines.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
Simpler robots under remote control are proposed, but a further objection says even basic logic systems can be compromised.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A proposed shipborne weapon would attack infected planets and ships while sparing the rest of the galaxy.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·
A bayonet cartoon is used to explain restraint when each side can retaliate.
From Five Doomsday Weapons of the Sci-fi universes, and the theories of Deterrence... why do they fail? ·