Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:02:12B-1 stand-off weapons and payloadQ&A
- Bruships 262: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:25:48What bomber departures from Fairford can establishQ&A
- Bruships 224: Alternate Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:04:27Would excluding polar routes reduce the B-52 force?Q&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P7 of 9 - Supplying Churchill’s Christmas Present: Battle of Cape Bon5:20:00TSR-2 and F-111 served different strike conceptsQ&A
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P31:44:17T12 Cloudmaker and the limits of giant bomb carriageNotable Point
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P31:46:50Why bomber volume can matter more than lifting powerQ&A
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P31:47:40A Boeing 747 with rotary cruise-missile launchersNotable Point
- #2Historians Live: With @Drachinifel comes to chat & build UAD Dreadnoughts that Almost were P31:51:35From Vulcan B3 studies to a Concorde bomberNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...32:25Vulcans challenged Red Flag from low and high altitudeNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:20:00Could a Vulcan successor fit Britain's contribution to NATO?Q&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:23:03A British heavy bomber would need a maritime-strike roleNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:24:22B-21 as a producible development of B-2 experienceNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:25:15Would a joint bomber program support British aircraft production?Notable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:29:03Does the joint-bomber proposal assume French demand?Q&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:31:40B-21's replacement sequence and the case for waiting to buyNotable Point
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:59Could Britain or Australia obtain B-21?Q&A
- Bruships 202: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:34:36Does B-21 trade capability for lower cost?Q&A
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...0:25Why early bomber-loss claims need repairability checksNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...18:22A safe engine choice still needed fighter-focused developmentNotable Point
- Bruships 188: Naval History Questions Answered Liven & Birthday Party...49:51Would nuclear-armed aircraft strengthen Britain's deterrent?Notable Point
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:01:27Could Britain or Australia acquire the B-21 Raider?Q&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:03:29Tradeoffs in an air-launched nuclear deterrentNotable Point
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:08:27Strategic-bomber basing and Australian alternativesNotable Point
- Bruships 172: So the Historiophon Happened...2:42:55Why few states build strategic bombersQ&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song2:34:32Why most U.S. allies are unlikely to build modern strategic bombersQ&A
- Bruships 164: Is this Book life? Is this just a library?Caught in a landslide, no Kallax for safety!4:00:08Why a modern bomber needs an impractical carrierQ&A
- Bruships 160: Money for Kallax, Book Space ain’t Free! Naval History Questions & Chat...2:24:32South African Victors and nuclear deliveryQ&A
- Bruships 137: Naval Aviation Books Discussed & Naval History Questions Answered2:42:24Why the XB-70 would not inherit the B-52's longevityQ&A
- Naval Historian Reacts to Aircraft Carriers the Debate: Part 1 of 232:45Carriers moved air power without moving an air baseNotable Point
- Cold War Goes Hot: Red Storm Norway 198050:11NATO's northern command and reinforcement problemChapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)26:10Why is a day-one conventional strike on Britain difficult?Q&A
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)2:21:03Why the B-52 remains the American heavy bomber in 1980Chapter
- Red Storm Rising: The GIUK Gap in a 1980 conventional war between the Warsaw Pact & NATO(Patreon 77)2:30:42The RAF still had a substantial Vulcan force in 1980Notable Point
- Bruships 102: New Books, Sea Wolves & Skagerrak2:58:17Why the B-52 keeps outliving newer bombersQ&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 42:17:15Australian B-21 talk centred more on basing than saleQ&A
- Bruships 83: New Books & Random Books for Random Times53:53Lancaster and Lincoln versus the Vickers Victory bomberQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon: The 1966 Defence White Paper & Lessons for the 2021 Defence Command Paper2:11:03Why carriers and strategic bombers are not substitutesQ&A
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper51:27Falklands capability gaps and the Vulcan legacyChapter
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P4 Britain in the World21:59Maritime air power and the bomber threatNotable Point
- Bruships 29: Best Seller History1:01:21Britain's long-range strike gap after VulcanNotable Point
- Bruships 29: Best Seller History1:05:48Black Buck's physical and psychological effectsQ&A
- Bruships 29: Best Seller History1:07:10Maritime patrol aircraft and heavy bombers: the anti-ship overlapQ&A
- Patreon 9 – “Suez goes hot in 1956” by Martin Doherty2:06:40Deterrence in the Bomber-Delivery EraQ&A