Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
The 1951-1954 study is tentatively identified as an investigation of whether an armored cruiser still had a useful place in missile-era fleets.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
When additional costs fall on the government, an underestimated bid can transfer the supplier's mistake to the customer.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Vasa's survival would chiefly deprive historians of the unusually complete wreck created by her sinking close to shore.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The caliber reduction is too small to fit a third gun into an existing twin 15-inch barbette, and the performance gain would not justify the work.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The proposed Agincourt prompts disagreement over triple 15-inch turrets and an 18-inch design, with broadside gun numbers central to the comparison.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The useful caliber depends on mission: roughly five inches for general purpose, smaller weapons for air defense, and much larger projectiles for land attack.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Spanish CATOBAR carrier would add major European reach but impose high air-group and infrastructure costs while prompting Italian and Turkish responses.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Ark Royal completed the immediate strike-carrier force, after which construction shifted to fleet-support carriers and later replacements for the older conversions.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Removing crews radically changes ship volume, systems, and construction, while months-long autonomous operation demands extensive redundancy.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Old hulls and the blast of 8-inch guns make Aegis conversion difficult; removing the after battery offers a possible layout.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Earlier construction could bring the Lion class forward and give the Royal Navy more time to resolve faults in the 14-inch quadruple turrets.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Hoche's changing requirements and succession of designers offer a distinct explanation for an awkward design.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Fitting twin 18-inch mountings would reduce a King George V-class battleship to too few guns for effective dreadnought-era combat.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
EDAR offers speed and range, while conventional landing craft remain cheaper and usable across a wider set of sea and beach conditions.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The LCM Mark 1 of 1938 and earlier motor landing craft place the development of familiar landing-craft forms in the interwar period.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An 18-inch practical limit remains disputed: 20-inch guns could work with accepted compromises, while 16 to 16.5 inches offers better value.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An early F-35B failure would probably lead to a CATOBAR design, with the number of carriers and their air groups still uncertain.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Falklands strengthened the case for British carriers, while northern-flank reinforcement and disaster relief support investment in amphibious ships.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Existing Harriers could offer a short bridge, but closed production lines and ageing airframes could not sustain a forty-year carrier program.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An engine-cover example connects aviation accident investigation with multiple contributing failures and changes to equipment design.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An Eagle-style Admiral conversion needs separate anti-aircraft and anti-surface batteries until a credible dual-purpose gun can combine those roles.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A PLUTO-style pipeline remains technically possible, while an Atlantic crossing raises engineering obstacles without a convincing justification.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Europa-sized liners might carry roughly 24 to 36 aircraft, with hangar layout, funnels, and German handling practice limiting theoretical capacity.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The proposed changes combine broader industry and pilot training with convertible carrier hulls, long-range submarines, and deliberate publicity for Yamato.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Broad pilot competence sustains replacements and gives aces the wingman cover they need, while survivors can become instructors.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Better Japanese aircraft production and trained replacements could turn the Philippine Sea into a much more costly carrier battle for both sides.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Warspite's Swordfish achieved an unusually favorable anti-submarine attack whose combination of clear water, shallow depth, and precise bombing was rarely repeated.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Three visible Yamato-class launches in 1940 could encourage Montana and Lion construction while planners still wanted battleships as a proven answer to battleships.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
New aircraft required enough industrial capacity to risk a production change and reliable transport to keep factories supplied.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Bulk personnel moves could still justify troopships, although the usual approach combines airlifted personnel with sea transport for equipment.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Santa Cruz is the likely choice for Enterprise's closest brush with sinking.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Glowworm's attack on Admiral Hipper and Spitfire's surviving collision at Jutland provide comparisons with Africa's isolated action at Trafalgar.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A strong base site combines deep navigable water, sheltered approaches, and shallow or tidal areas suitable for building docks and support facilities.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Prince of Wales and Repulse would use their speed to disengage rather than fight two Japanese 16-inch battleships.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Asteroid wealth could fund an eight-carrier force, larger surface combatants, autoloading cruisers, all the Darings, and later missile-era replacements.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Even imaginary wealth must enter the economy gradually, but sustained debt relief could alter Britain's postwar power and the balance behind the Suez Crisis.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A cruiser of this scale becomes either a carrier-group centerpiece or a powerful independent strike ship carrying hundreds of missiles.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
With Courageous and the Admiral hulls unavailable, barely started G3s would become nearly purpose-built carriers rather than difficult conversions.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
For most medieval states, more merchant ships meant more hulls available for conversion into warships.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A trans-Canada oil pipeline and a post-Panamax St. Lawrence Seaway solve different logistics problems, and both require long-term infrastructure commitments.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Stella Matris's two twin 400 mm mountings answer close-range threats specific to the Eighty-Six setting.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Portsmouth and Liverpool would spread British repair capacity across different coasts, while Gibraltar and Australia or Singapore offer overseas options.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Synthetic fuel would reduce the effect of the American oil embargo while leaving Japan's dependence on imported scrap iron.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Colossus's transitional design and Victoria's mixed-calibre armament invite comparison with a larger, four-gun Victoria alternative.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A further Lord Nelson-type design could have introduced 13.5-inch guns before Dreadnought and changed the new battleship's armament.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A 1.5-inch increase offered enough performance to justify a new weapon while letting Britain manage the pace of international caliber escalation.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A heavier-armed Dreadnought could force rivals to meet a larger gun standard alongside turbines and an all-big-gun layout.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Better 1930s engines could support one twin-engine carrier airframe for strike, reconnaissance, ASW, and fighter work while simplifying distant logistics.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·