Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Surcouf's heavy-gun concept draws criticism for its operational practicality, while other objections concern hazardous submarine technology.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Farragut and Santa Cruz offer a close hypothetical match, with personal preference providing the only stated edge.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A speculative challenge to Philip II draws on Santa Cruz's ability to command both at sea and on land.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A completed class of very large missile cruisers would reduce pressure on carriers and destroyers by creating another tier of crisis-response force.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A fictional shortage of ZPMs leads to a logistics argument for protecting production facilities beyond an enemy's reach.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Alaska would likely join Canada and eventually enlarge imperial oil resources, but early naval benefits depend on tankers, refining, and discovery timing.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Another major imperial oil producer could weaken Anglo-Persian's bargaining position and compete for favorable agreements.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A battleship with four octuple turrets would need an immense hull, prompting disagreement over how many missiles it would take to sink.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The K class combined high-powered steam turbines with multiple retractable funnels, making diving dependent on a complex sequence of failure-prone closures.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A fictional tank's immediate battlefield power would not give First World War armies the materials, fuel, or knowledge needed to reproduce it.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An Admiral-derived carrier could use a twin-engine family for strike, reconnaissance, and fast attacks on incoming air formations.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A hypothetical 1939 naval twin would need contemporary engines and a carrier-suitable structure, which limits comparisons with the later Sea Hornet.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Two engines offer an earlier route to the power and payload that later strike aircraft can obtain from one much more powerful engine.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A longer wing can increase carrying ability while creating structural and storage problems that complicate a carrier aircraft's folding arrangement.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Spare-engine exchanges could limit downtime, although a twin-engine air group still requires more engines and an unquantified servicing burden.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Climb and diving attacks support a formation-breaking role, while efficient long wings impose structural and deck-space costs at sea.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Navy's existing combinations of aircraft roles support a common design, but strike and patrol demands prevent optimizing it solely for interception.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Combat experience could justify specialized fighters, while a large common air group offers a competing advantage in the size of its standing patrol.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A larger patrol is proposed as a way to disrupt escorted strikes before the fleet's guns engage, though the twins' ability to penetrate the escort is disputed.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Larger twins could use the space of an enormous carrier without increasing aircraft numbers beyond the proposed practical limit of its air-group organization.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The proposed successor's identity remains unresolved, preventing a firm comparison with the I-400.
From Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The opening distinguishes the Anglo-German race in fleet numbers from a wider international contest to build more capable battleships.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
A treaty would have to begin before Roosevelt left office, despite an American political coalition strongly invested in naval growth.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Roosevelt's international standing depended on public appearances, press management, and the calculated display of American power as well as direct diplomacy.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Fisher, McKenna, Asquith, and the Crown regarded Royal Navy superiority as essential, ruling out equal fleet ratios in 1909.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Japan's victory over Russia and dependence on sea power make freezing its still-growing fleet politically unattractive.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
France needed to recover from a serious dreadnought lag while unstable coalitions made a durable treaty position difficult to sustain.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Dante Alighieri embodied Italy's claim to great-power standing, while parliamentary and naval politics made voluntary restraint unattractive.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The German Army had a budgetary reason to curb naval spending, but Wilhelm II and Tirpitz had invested prestige and policy in fleet expansion.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The Washington settlement rested on fiscal, social, and reconstruction pressures that did not exist in 1909.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Four years after Tsushima, Imperial Russia saw the Gangut program as a way to restore military credibility and great-power standing.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The Dual Monarchy was hard to bind diplomatically, yet Admiral Rudolf Montecuccoli was determined to secure a modern battle fleet.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Uncertain technology, national prestige, too many relevant powers, and weak mutual trust defeat a comprehensive ratio system.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Gun development and shipbuilding supported employment, research, and national industry, adding domestic economic interests to the diplomatic barriers against a treaty.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Army support for a spending ceiling could collide with Wilhelm II's prestige politics and Tirpitz's fleet program, creating an internal German crisis rather than stable restraint.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Russia and Britain could cite widely dispersed theatres to argue that formally equal limits would leave them with unequal security.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The one plausible agreement would leave numbers unlimited while capping each capital ship near 25,000 tons and 12- or 14-inch guns.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
With ship numbers unlimited, a common design ceiling favors industrial powers that can repeat one battleship design at scale.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Once displacement and gun calibre are capped, propulsion becomes the clearest remaining route to a superior battleship.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Predictable unit costs could unite American political rivals and let Britain repeat a mature design without surrendering fleet numbers.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
A stable ceiling gives Japan and France time to strengthen their industrial bases without fearing an even larger foreign battleship.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Italy could build a strong Mediterranean battleship within the ceiling, but the rule would suppress the high-quality designs used to offset limited industrial scale.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Tirpitz gains a predictable basis for the risk fleet, but German designers must trade speed, armour, freeboard, and gun calibre inside the cap.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The Gangut design sits close to the proposed limit, but Russia needs endurance and protection for deployments between widely separated fleets.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The leap from Iron Duke to Queen Elizabeth shows how quickly a plausible 1909 ceiling would obstruct a new generation of naval architecture.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
A ship-size cap fails if signatory yards can still build larger battleships for Brazil, Argentina, Chile, the Ottoman Empire, Greece, or another outside customer.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
Builders could hide an oversized battleship behind category claims, incomplete armour, or water tanks used as protection, while governments lacked a strong reason to enforce the cap.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·
The closing preview explains how Rear Admiral Richard Darton Thomas ended Britain's occupation of Hawaii while preserving British prestige and containing American triumphalism.
From Could Teddy Roosevelt do a Naval Treaty in 1909 & if so what might it be like? ·