Related time notes
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 221:30How navies might answer a 40,000-ton Chinese surface combatantQ&A
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 28:39Why modern combatants usually have aviation facilitiesQ&A
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:10:26A world where cruisers never disappearQ&A
- Bruships 249: Modern Navy & Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:16:11The case for more 76 mm guns on surface combatantsQ&A
- Bruships 233: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:19:37Could Canada field nuclear-powered surface combatants?Q&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:06:00Laser-guided rockets from surface shipsQ&A
- Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:08:55A modernized Bofors 120 mm gun in 2010Q&A
- Bruships 227: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:32:45Endurance separates a modern corvette from a frigateQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:17:30A Coast Guard cutter hull for the US Navy frigateQ&A
- Bruships 226: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:57Why an SSBN is not the modern battleshipQ&A
- Trumps Battleship; A Naval History view on what we know of the Defiant Class so far1:28Why the Defiant is called a guided-missile battleshipChapter
- The World Naval Review 2026: A Great Key Book Series20:36Falklands lessons lead to depth fuses for existing bombsNotable Point
- The World Naval Review 2026: A Great Key Book Series29:43Cruiser labels prompt an objection about destroyer-leader originsNotable Point
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P9 of 9 - A Movie Star in the Making: HMS Portchester Castle7:01:20Why Canada calls Type 26 ships destroyersQ&A
- 36hrs Live Historiophon 2025: P6 of 9 - The Royal Navy’s Submarine Killers – Black Swans at War6:50:30Indonesia's amphibious strength and escort weaknessQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 3 of 9 - Combat Stress8:24:51A proposed nuclear strike cruiser as a Ticonderoga replacementQ&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida2:49:55Why Pakistan still needs surface warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:35:33The response to Russian nuclear escorts depends on scaleQ&A
- Bruships 219: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:13:09Type 22 and Kidd classes performed modern cruiser workQ&A
- Bruships 217: Back from Japan 2025: Jetlag is a Myth - Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:50:00Which navy might build the next battlecruiser?Q&A
- Nuclear Powered Warships: are they worth the cost?0:09When nuclear power suits a surface warshipQ&A
- Nuclear Powered Warships: are they worth the cost?13:44Modern escorts often perform cruiser rolesNotable Point
- Bruships 211: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:08:46Why surface combatants may pass 30,000 tons againQ&A
- Procurement for Peace: Second Draft2:30:45Why the US Navy failed to replace the Perry classQ&A
- Lessons of Falklands War(1982) and Ukraine War(2022-)1:01:21Surface escorts make power projection possibleNotable Point
- 21st Century Battleship: What would a battleship built today need to be a battleship?23:24A visible presence ship between a frigate and a carrier groupChapter
- Bruships 185: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:31:34What navies would call a new large surface warshipQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:47:49What a MOAB would do to a warshipQ&A
- Bruships 184: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:28:02Can uncrewed ships preserve surface-combatant production skills?Q&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II22:49Is there still a place for a large missile cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II1:13:02Mark 41 or Sylver: choosing a vertical-launch systemQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...1:06:55What small catapults on surface combatants were forQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:55:41What a new surface-warfare capital ship would be calledQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!1:12:40Small modular reactors for high-power surface combatantsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:05:36Strike drones could increase the number of close-in gunsQ&A
- Bruships 170: Once more unto the Kalax dear listners, once more unto the Kalax!4:41:09Batteries and supercapacitors aboard surface warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....2:29:53Could 6-inch naval guns return?Q&A
- Bruships 166: As I walk through the library of Naval History, I take a look at my shelf space....4:06:37Zumwalt already has strike-cruiser scaleQ&A
- Bruships 132: Questions till the Milk or Pancreas Runs Out2:12:27Large naval guns may return under a new labelQ&A
- When does a navy know it is time to replace a type or class of ships? P2/2 Lego enhanced discussion15:49Anti-submarine warfare cannot be wished awayNotable Point
- When does a navy know it is time to replace a type or class of ships? P2/2 Lego enhanced discussion17:54Why submarines are easier to define than surface shipsNotable Point
- 1860-1960 A Hundred Years of Gun Cruisers33:26Do all modern warships perform the cruiser role?Notable Point
- Bruships 93: Soviet Navy Books & Random Books4:24:48Why 2030s surface combatants keep growingQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road43:35A modern 42,000-ton combatant would demand nuclear power and a vast magazineQ&A
- Bruships 90: Books From the Road2:32:30A twin 76 mm battery would give Type 31 stronger all-round gun coverageQ&A
- Chapyev Class (Projekt 68 of the Soviet Navy): Fighting the Peace15:43Why the Soviet Navy became cruiser-centeredChapter
- Chapyev Class (Projekt 68 of the Soviet Navy): Fighting the Peace17:07Hull efficiency limits the appeal of distributed flotillasNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?1:22:25A Royal Navy force built around Type 26Q&A
- Action of the 18th June 1799: How to Lose Frigates and Influence (Live)2:06:51How should a Canadian offshore patrol vessel be armed?Q&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat1:47:29Starting a modern large cruiser from the Zumwalt hullQ&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat2:05:49Hypersonic missiles as part of a mixed magazineQ&A
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat2:30:32Why navies need a successor to Mk 41 VLSNotable Point
- Bruships 62: Naval History Book Review & Chat2:49:26The harsh environment for uncrewed surface vesselsQ&A
- Bruships 58: Some Cool Books & Naval History Chat1:14:27Why the Iver Huitfeldt class stands outQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:31:33Why Type 83 could become a quasi-capital shipQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:35:47A lower-risk route to a new U.S. surface combatantQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:47:37A future U.S. destroyer with cruiser displacementQ&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron3:54:14Do flag facilities and missile counts define a cruiser?Q&A
- Bruships 51: The Age of Iron4:02:40Why an LPD hull is difficult to turn into an escortQ&A
- Bruships 50: A D-Day special with Questions & some New Books from Pen & Sword4:04:56How Type 26, Type 31, and Type 83 divide Royal Navy rolesNotable Point
- Bruships 44: Strategy3:57:54Could warships return to two main guns?Q&A
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:38:18Why ocean-going combatants grow toward 10,000 tonsNotable Point
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:45:02Why a 25,000-ton do-everything warship is riskyQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:46:43An upgraded LCS as a Saudi mini-BurkeQ&A
- Bru Ships Episode 11: Top Trumps/Ship Comparison Themed Books to Review & a general Q/A2:51:31Are modern warships under-armed for their sizeQ&A