Naval Historywith Dr. Alex

Topic

Norwegian Army

Related time notes

  1. Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?
    1:03:29Fleischer's northern command offered a readiness templateChapter
  2. Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?
    1:04:35How partial mobilization could put formations at the landing pointsNotable Point
  3. Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?
    1:08:14Regional commanders would have tested Norway's paper readinessNotable Point
  4. Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?
    1:10:23Laake's political loyalty and the limits of army commandChapter
  5. Who was to blame for Norway falling in 1940?
    1:16:29Norway still had a final chance to mobilize in April 1940Chapter
  6. HMS Gorgon(HNoMS Nidaros) takes part in the First Battle of Narvik
    7:54Why Carl Gustav Fleischer was sidelinedNotable Point
  7. HMS Gorgon(HNoMS Nidaros) takes part in the First Battle of Narvik
    21:52The blocked withdrawal toward BjørnfjellNotable Point
  8. HMS Gorgon(HNoMS Nidaros) takes part in the First Battle of Narvik
    56:22Surviving warships change Sundlo's surrender calculusNotable Point
  9. Leadership of the Russo-Swedish Wars of the 18th Century(1700-1790)
    3:49:47How army museums present military experienceNotable Point
  10. Bruships 179: Future Projects & Naval History Questions...
    1:26:39How mobilisation communications could change the Narvik landingNotable Point
  11. WWII if Norway Wins & Operation Weserübung Fails...
    30:23Norwegian command turns naval victory into victory ashoreNotable Point
  12. Patreon 87: Norway Stands! WWII if Norway repels the German invasion...
    57:01How an Allied Norway drives the landing backChapter
  13. Patreon 87: Norway Stands! WWII if Norway repels the German invasion...
    1:01:08Why use a major general to coordinate Allied forces?Q&A
  14. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 5 of 5: What ifs, Ships & Patreon Votes
    3:43Denmark as a warning for Norwegian mobilizationChapter
  15. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 5 of 5: What ifs, Ships & Patreon Votes
    6:38Command resolve and Norway's half-hearted mobilizationNotable Point
  16. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 3 of 5: Namsos, De Wiart & Fleischer
    18:38The case for concentrating at Namsos and TrondheimNotable Point
  17. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 3 of 5: Namsos, De Wiart & Fleischer
    27:15Fleischer's aggressive use of terrain and troopsChapter
  18. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 2 of 5: Planning, Invasion & Narvik,
    23:53Denmark's fall and Norway's slow mobilisationChapter
  19. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 2 of 5: Planning, Invasion & Narvik,
    26:08How stopping the Narvik group might have reshaped NorwayNotable Point
  20. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 2 of 5: Planning, Invasion & Narvik,
    36:30Narvik's unready garrison and Fleischer's responseChapter
  21. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    18:23Cabinet turnover weakened Norwegian defence policyChapter
  22. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    28:09Why Birger Ljungberg was chosen over Otto RugeChapter
  23. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    31:27Mobilization politics and Norwegian readinessChapter
  24. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    35:01Why force totals conceal the importance of timingNotable Point
  25. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    37:20Operation Weserübung attacks several ports at onceChapter
  26. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    40:39General Laake and the cost of peacetime defence cutsNotable Point
  27. 1940 Norway Campaign Part 1 of 5: Introduction
    44:17Denmark's invasion and the Norway campaign timetableNotable Point