Related time notes
- Soviet Destroyers of the 1930s: Trying to Rebuild/Build a navy in the face of heart led shipyards...47:52Tashkent's enclosed gun mounts and limited protectionChapter
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....1:46:38Could twin naval gun mounts return?Q&A
- Historiophon 2025: part 1 of 9 - National Museum of the Royal Navy II9:13:40The limits of a 72-caliber 136 mm naval gunQ&A
- Bruships 195: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:52Largest calibre in a quintuple gun mountQ&A
- 40mm AA in WWII: Pom-Pom or Bofors? how did the two systems compare in theory and practice?2:29:16Why Pom-Pom mounts stopped short of sixteen barrelsNotable Point
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...46:20Why the L-class 120 mm mount had widely spaced gunsQ&A
- Bruships 180: Naval History Questions Answered...Part II28:30Why a single 5-inch Mark 42 could fire quicklyQ&A
- Essay Competion, UAD ship design & Questions: Third 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 3/48:09:53Why a fourth Gearing turret was not a simple experimentQ&A
- Bruships 171: Oh Kallax my Kallax, Where art though my Kallax1:18:01A 4.7-inch test mount would not make the 130 mm gun interchangeableQ&A
- Bruships 150: Naval History Questions Answered, Boxes Packed & July Patreon Suggestions Kicks Off2:27:26Why multiple mounts reached smaller guns slowlyQ&A
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered2:02:31What makes a twin 5-inch mount time-consumingQ&A
- Bruships 139: Books will be Attempted, Questions will be Answered1:18:28Why modern navies favor single gun mountsQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 817:35Shell weight and the limits of manual loadingQ&A
- A Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts Campaign: Building a Battle Cruiser Navy... part 850:03Would twin 76 mm mounts improve air defence?Q&A
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 196054:03Aircraft made gun elevation and data transfer urgent problemsChapter
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 196056:00Heavy shells made mechanical ammunition handling essentialChapter
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 19601:01:29From USS Monitor to King George V, turrets became industrial systemsChapter
- Ranging & Stabilising: How Gunnery Evolved from 1860 to 19601:04:21Turret layouts balanced accuracy, arcs, and redundancyNotable Point
- Chilean Civil War & the sinking of the Blanco Encalada1:18:35Inside Blanco Encalada's muzzle-loading batteryNotable Point
- Starting with Building HMS Thunderchild...2:32:38Destroyer air defence is limited by space and arcsNotable Point
- Christmas Videos Comment Response: 4.7in Dual Purpose what if & Soviet Navy 1939-651:01:51Treaty weight constrained enclosed Tribal-class mountsQ&A
- Bruships 96: Vikings, Okinawa & 2nd to Last Pre-Christmas 2022 Naval Chat4:05:43Single gun mounts trade firepower for easier upkeepQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?1:20:09Why the 4.5-inch upper-deck mount kept slippingQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?2:09:12Removed destroyer mounts could return on new shipsQ&A
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?2:31:08Mount assembly was not the same as turret productionNotable Point
- Shortcomings with the designs of 'Early' Aircraft Carriers: Patreon 652:43:15What are the tradeoffs of open carrier gun mounts?Q&A
- Projecting Mussonlini's Mare Nostrum: Italian 1920s & 1930s cruiser design/doctrine2:35:12Two six-inch gun families preserve rival production linesNotable Point