Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:37:22Missiles for a modified Type 45 in Sea PowerQ&A
- Bruships 265: Science Fiction & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:15:59An enlarged Type 45 as a Type 83 starting pointQ&A
- Bruships 264: Naval History Questions Answered Live3:11:02Does VL MICA use Mark 41 or Sylver launchers?Q&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:16:58A heavily armed Type 45 design exerciseQ&A
- Bruships 263: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:12:10Strike-length VLS and room for future weaponsQ&A
- Air Defence At Sea: From Air Ships in 1906, to drones in 2026 and everything in between...3:27:42A proposal for a larger Type 45 missile loadoutNotable Point
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow: Type 26s, FREMMs & Nilgiris vs Mogami, Type 31s & FDIs1:08:24French, Greek, and Swedish FDI missile fitsChapter
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age46:20The Italian Horizon ships inherit the three-gun layoutChapter
- Korean Destroyers: Core of a Statement Surface Fleet28:44KDX-II combines Mark 41 and Korean VLS in a multipurpose destroyerChapter
- Korean Destroyers: Core of a Statement Surface Fleet39:46Missile diversity protects the fleet from supply interruptionNotable Point
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:13:14European VLS and Sylver adoption limitsQ&A
- Bruships 244: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:41VLS supply reliability and industrial sovereigntyNotable Point
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:19:10Deep StanFlex modules for VLSQ&A
- Bruships 238: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:17:25Could an international StanFlex standard have changed LCS?Q&A
- Why do Modern Warships just keep getting bigger?16:05Why containerized VLS does not fit cleanlyNotable Point
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....1:29:36Strike-length VLS preserves future weapon choicesChapter
- Ideal Destroyers down the generations from 1901 to present day....2:46:36Why VLS length labels do not standardize firepowerQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:09:33Why British Mark 41 integration pressures the Sylver familyQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:37:26Why VLS cell count cannot define corvettes, frigates, destroyers, and cruisersQ&A
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3rd Start1:40:00Type 45 and Horizon retained common launchers after Britain left the joint programNotable Point
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...32:28A family design for a heavily armed Type 45Notable Point
- How to go about Designing a Warship... and a Fleet!41:25Choose combat systems before drawing the hullChapter
- Why are Modern Warships getting bigger? (Live)28:26Container dimensions constrain naval missile launchersNotable Point
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...After Power Cut2:21:50A heavily armed modern destroyer conceptQ&A
- Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:16:10Modern frigates judged against national doctrineQ&A
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!24:10Could European navies move away from US weapons systems?Q&A
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!1:28:43Can European naval systems replace US-sourced components?Q&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20244:38:48Why Type 45 uses Sylver while Type 26 and Type 31 receive Mark 41Q&A
- Traditional French Bonhomie to spare via the only non USN Nuclear Carrier! The Charles de Gaulle!33:55Launcher depth and Charles de Gaulle's own air defenceNotable Point
- Bruships 37: New Books & Some More Transactions of the Institute of Naval Architects3:30:26Could Type 45 replace Sylver A50 with Mark 41?Q&A