Related time notes
- Bruships 266: Naval History Questions Answered Live4:04:26Would a bomber-and-carrier strategy still need Tornado?Q&A
- The Perils of Standardisation: Can Navy's Standardise too much? (Patreon Premier)43:42Overlapping aircraft fleets smooth capability gapsChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:53:36Carrier gaps and the Libya lessonChapter
- Where has Britain's Royal Navy Gone?1:56:26Why Harrier versus Tornado was a false choiceNotable Point
- Bruships 230: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:29:29Favourite jets and Foxo's proposed Tornado GR6Q&A
- Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:57:32Choosing one modern aircraft for Pearl HarborQ&A
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers30:53P.1213 and P.1216 carried the supersonic successor into the 1980sChapter
- Britains Obsession with Supersonic Harriers42:43F-35B completed a sixty-year search for a Super HarrierNotable Point
- Bruships 190: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:59:27What retaining Harrier and Tornado could have preservedQ&A
- Strategic Defence & Security Review 2025: What would a naval historian do?2:39:24Do not retire old capability before its replacement arrivesNotable Point
- Tribal, Battle & Daring Class Destroyers: 5yrs since the first live stream!2:18:27German naval aviation after the Tornado transferQ&A
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:02:58What might have followed Britain's Canberra and Sea Vixen target dronesQ&A
- Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 20243:35:15Why West Germany's navy operated Starfighters and TornadosQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/41:19:10A carrier Tornado would effectively be a new aircraftQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/45:09:03A carrier Tornado could keep France in the multinational programQ&A
- Questions, Flower Class & the Essay Competition: First 9 of the 36hr Historiophon Part 1/46:48:41A Buccaneer S.3 could carry Tornado-era systems to seaQ&A
- @Drachinifel & Dr Clarke Discuss Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers that almost were! #2Historians ep 11:36:20Would a navalized Tornado work?Q&A
- Bruships 168: And a empty Kalax, sang the aisles a serenade, longing for books with a love song3:20:17Why a naval Tornado would effectively be a new aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 167: Tell me why, everything turned book – packing up, stacking up is all kalax want to do.2:53:41Why a naval Tornado would be a new aircraftQ&A
- Bruships 161: All you need are Kallax, Shelves are all Books need... Naval History Questions & Chat!1:18:00A naval Tornado would need a redesigned carrier forceQ&A
- Bruships 158: Home for Naval History Questions & Trialing the new Question Bot... so cross fingers!1:07:43Phantom instead of a navalized TornadoQ&A
- Top 5 Inventions that came too Late18:10The out-of-area airborne-early-warning gapChapter
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out Take 227:11What a carrier-capable Tornado would requireQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...1:59:40The fleet built around retained CATOBAR carriersQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...2:40:52P.1154 and HS.1202 paths not takenChapter
- Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)2:04:16Why Britain repeatedly passed over French combat aircraftQ&A
- British Geostrategic Situation in the 1960s: The 1966 White Paper20:00The F-111 stopgap and the V-bomber roleNotable Point
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:44:45Why a land-based Tornado could not simply go to seaQ&A
- Pseudo Patreon British Aircraft Carrier development Since 1945 (as suggested by Kyle Hardman)2:47:43Why wider landing gear would not create a naval TornadoQ&A
- Britain of the 1980s: Long Patrol P3a/7 Keith Speed (Continued)5:26Distributed anti-ship weapons across the fleetChapter