Related time notes
- Key Frigates of Today & Tomorrow: Type 26s, FREMMs & Nilgiris vs Mogami, Type 31s & FDIs6:25City, River, and Hunter variants in allied task groupsChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)33:23Type 26's ASW design sets limits on an air-defence conversionChapter
- Live: What the Royal Navy's Type 83 Will Not Be: AKA Reality of Future Air Dominance System(FADS)38:27Heavy radar and the Type 42 stretch show how hull changes spreadNotable Point
- Bruships 235: Alternate History & Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:32:07Type 32 evolution and a larger British defence budgetQ&A
- Bruships 234: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:03:56An American Type 26 would blend allied variantsQ&A
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!5:10Australia trades Hunter-class depth for fleet breadthChapter
- Type 26 & Type 31 Frigate Program Updates: City, Hunter, River(Destroyer), Inspiration & the rest!21:01Rebuilding Australian and Canadian shipbuildingChapter
- Bruships 221: Naval History Questions Answered Live...3:59:10New Zealand replacement needs and regional frigate choicesQ&A
- Bruships 127: 2023 Christmas Naval History Releases2:28:20Type 26 and Type 45 grew from families of possible hull sizesNotable Point
- Bruships 113: Jutland2:38:18Why rebuilding Australian shipbuilding raises Hunter costsNotable Point
- Patreon 57: Modern frigates, cruisers by another name?2:23:28Type 26 as a global cruiser familyChapter
- Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN33:12Why uneven shipbuilding raises Australian program costsChapter
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN36:47Why Type 26 variants can differ greatly in displacementQ&A
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN1:52:24Why the Hunter design is being pulled toward air defenceNotable Point
- Patreon 53: Comparison of Future Warships for the RN/RAN/RCN/RNZN2:06:08Type 26 as a shared architecture with national variantsNotable Point
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?7:12Why Britain, Australia and Canada equip the hull differentlyChapter
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?12:19Hunter and CSC turn an ASW hull into broader combatantsChapter
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?14:01What the three variants share in hull and enduranceNotable Point
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?17:17Missile-cell counts and the trap in simple comparisonsChapter
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?24:55Specialist British escort or all-round Commonwealth combatant?Chapter
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?28:39Ship names as links to predecessors, places and communitiesNotable Point
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?30:24The Tribal-class model for Hunter and CSCChapter
- The 3 Type 26s - City, Hunter & CSC, where do they fit in the WWII navies that they will serve?34:22Why allied task groups still value specialist ASW escortsNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...31:01Australia's Hunter: the Type 26 with an Aegis emphasisChapter
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:34:14How national naming traditions complicate the Type 26 familyNotable Point
- Patreon 38: Evaluating Type 26 Frigates against WW2 ship classes...1:36:44Hunter and CSC as modern all-round Tribal-type escortsChapter