Should Type 32 be an improved Type 31, and would a 3.5 percent defence budget change that approach?
Short answerKeep Type 32 as an evolution of Type 31, while examining faster AUKUS construction, more Type 26 frigates, and Dreadnought-based SSGNs.
NotesThe City, Hunter, and River classes are described as contemporary variations of the Type 26 design. Type 32 would still be developed from Type 31 even with a British defence budget of 3.5 percent of GDP. Additional funding could accelerate AUKUS construction and increase Type 26 orders. A couple of guided-missile-submarine variants of the Dreadnought class are another possibility raised for examination. These are proposed as practical uses of a substantial budget increase, with the choices depending on where the money becomes available.