Related time notes
- Bruships 258: Naval History Questions Answered Live2:21:29The air-support misunderstanding around Force ZNotable Point
- Bruships 250: Naval History Questions Answered Live...53:30Force Z and the meaning of 'no air support'Notable Point
- Bruships 196: Naval History Questions Answered Live...2:27:55The communication failure behind Force Z's missing fighter coverQ&A
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...0:31Why the Brewster Buffalo's reputation needs another lookChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...4:46Why a good 1940 fighter could be obsolete by 1942Notable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...5:55The Buffalo in the US Navy's pugnacious fighter traditionNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...10:33Carrier landings exposed a fixable undercarriage weaknessNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...11:18Why Brewster chose the Wright Cyclone engineChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...15:01Export engines and the Cyclone's altitude penaltyNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...16:45Eleven deliveries could not equip Saratoga's VF-3Notable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...18:22A safe engine choice still needed fighter-focused developmentNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...19:25What the F2A-3 specifications offeredChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...20:45Could mass production have supported a stronger Buffalo engine?Notable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...23:16The A5M as the Buffalo's contemporary benchmarkNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...25:33Could Canadian production have rescued the Buffalo?Notable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...27:07US Navy additions exhausted the Buffalo's growth marginChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...28:44The proposed reconnaissance Buffalo with 20 mm cannonNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...29:22An aircraft without an upgrade team falls behindNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...30:43Why Britain bought a second-choice fighterChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...32:28British equipment made the export Buffalo heavier and weakerNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...34:25Five Buffalo squadrons carried the Far East fighter burdenChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...36:21How the Ki-43 changed the Buffalo's air combat prospectsNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...38:10Swedish assembly and the Fiat G.50 comparisonChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...40:33Finnish mechanics unlocked the Buffalo's strengthsChapter
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...42:53Spares, Bf 109Gs, and the Buffalo's long Finnish afterlifeNotable Point
- Brewster Buffalo: An Aircraft let down by it's Company...55:20The lost third line of US Navy fightersNotable Point
- Leadership Alive: What happens if Adm R. Henderson & Adm W. Fisher Live through WWII?59:01North American orders replace a lost generation of naval aircraftChapter
- Bruships 187: Naval History Questions Answered Live...1:14:13How Henderson and Fisher might redirect British carrier aviationNotable Point
- Could Seaplanes Tenders have been used in the Battle for the Atlantic? Naval History Live!24:03Could float Sea Gladiators have bought Force Z time?Notable Point
- Could Seaplanes Tenders have been used in the Battle for the Atlantic? Naval History Live!2:41:21How carrier fighter direction could bring Buffaloes to Force ZNotable Point
- Taranto Zero: Japan joins WWII on side of Britain in June 1940 - Patreon Alternate History1:14:32Carrier readiness and aircraft numbers reshape the Taranto planNotable Point
- Bruships 117: Battle Cruisers, Battle-Cruisers or Battlecruisers?15:54The Brewster Buffalo as a 1939 Fleet Air Arm bridgeQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett2:59:47Engine, pilot protection, and wing changes to the WildcatQ&A
- Ship-Shape Special: Alex & Garius Command a Carrier... How bad can this be?28:44Why the Buffalo's climb rate mattered aboard carriersNotable Point
- Patreon 68: What if the Royal Navy went 4.7in rather than 4.5in for dual purpose?2:38:48Could Brewster Buffaloes have protected Force Z?Q&A
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations2:39:52Could an escort carrier have saved Force Z?Q&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1941-4239:22How fighters could have disrupted the attack on Force ZQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:37:14How a carrier could change the fate of Force ZQ&A
- Five Ways to Fix the Fleets of WWII 1939-401:39:26Why tactics matter more than aircraft specifications aloneQ&A
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5c Introduction to Patreon Video 413:32American carrier-fighter options before the CorsairNotable Point
- Tsingtao 1939: WWII but in January & against Japan - P5c Introduction to Patreon Video 422:26Italian air power faces a Pacific-tested carrier fleetNotable Point
- An Introduction to “The Battle of Malaya & Force Z” – Part 2: The Counter-Factual; My Plan17:29Concentrate and disperse the air defenceNotable Point