Related time notes
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:57:54Where a 9.2-inch-gun cruiser might fitQ&A
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?2:58:37Why the Royal Navy stopped with the Indefatigable classNotable Point
- What happens to WWI if the Royal Navy got a full Admiralty Staff when the General Staff came to be?3:24:47How the United States might answer Canadian battlecruisersQ&A
- Battle of Sinop(1853): The Death Knell or a Useful Patsy?1:09:31How a different victor might have changed Sinop’s design lessonNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer2:00:42What a higher treaty limit could do to Nelson and RodneyQ&A
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer2:48:37The 170-gun Duke of Kent proposal and uncertain attributionNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer3:31:44How unused Nelson-class tonnage affected a wartime pursuitNotable Point
- Bruships 120: One Book & One Book only... Battleships & Battle Cruisers 1905-70 by Seigfried Breyer3:34:09How a third propeller shaft could fit the Nelson classQ&A
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon1:19:19A different Jutland could favour fast battleshipsChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon2:05:33How fast battleships could complicate the postwar balanceChapter
- Nothing Wrong With Our Shells; Alternate History, Jutland if Royal Navy Shells Work extended editon2:09:23A fast battleship is easier to balance than a battlecruiserNotable Point
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett1:38:43Why treaty battleships used three turretsQ&A
- Bruships 112: Julian Corbett3:15:38Why design ships a navy may never build?Q&A
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?1:09:23Pagoda masts and the logic of visual identificationNotable Point
- A potential American Response to the 18in HMS Agincourt?2:52:38The design cost of an 18-inch treaty maximumChapter
- Cruiser Actions of the 1898 Spanish American War12:10USS Maine as an armoured cruiser and diplomatic signalChapter
- Cruiser Actions of the 1898 Spanish American War31:36USS Olympia and a cruiser-centered American forceChapter
- Cruiser Actions of the 1898 Spanish American War1:04:43Were Plutón and Furor true torpedo-boat destroyers?Notable Point
- French Cruiser Policy & Doctrine of the 1920s & 30s (Long Patrol)1:05:09French eight-inch ships as fast first-class cruisersChapter
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels46:08Why Britain designed the Lion-class battleshipsQ&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels1:23:06Royal Navy battleship design continued beyond individual classesQ&A
- Bruships 80: Books From Travels3:21:29USS Little Rock and flexible mission spacesNotable Point
- Patreon 47: Putting the USA's 2nd fleet to work - US Coast Guard's presence missions & deployment1:40:43Treasury-class cutters: range adapted to the Coast Guard missionNotable Point
- British Industry: The More than Just Ships P3/4: Maintaining (Royal Navy Dockyards II)53:35A standing Commonwealth design bureau could preserve frigate skillsNotable Point
- How was British Night Fighting Doctrine developed for and then practiced during WWII? (Long Patrol)56:08Nelson and Rodney in the night-fighting conceptNotable Point
- Admiral John Arbuthnot 'Jackie' Fisher: Long Patrol1:37:23Fisher's legacy in the fast battleshipNotable Point
- Battle of the Atlantic: Escort Procurement - Comment Response20:20Merchant aircraft carriers were not one person's inventionQ&A
- The Battles of Dogger Bank 1696-19163:16:39Why Blücher was not a true battlecruiserNotable Point