Topic

F3 Battlecruiser Design

Related time notes

  1. What would need to change for HMAS Australia & HMS New Zealand to be retained under Washington?
    51:49Britain could divide its allowance among three battlecruisersNotable Point
  2. Historiophon 2025: part 2 of 9 - Friends of HMCS Haida
    6:00:16What Britain might demand for additional treaty scrappingQ&A
  3. Bruships 212: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    1:56:12Dominion battlecruisers as dry-dock policyQ&A
  4. Bruships 204: Naval History Questions Answered Live...
    3:59:43Why continued treaty-era construction could replace Renown and Repulse before TigerNotable Point
  5. Scuttlebutt 11: from SDSR to Pearl Harbor, with a stop at CVA-01 along the way...
    42:47An F3-style alternative for Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
  6. Dalrymple Hamilton: The Captain of HMS Rodney who believed she could be a destroyer
    54:15Nelson-class armour came at the price of speedNotable Point
  7. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    19:43F2 and F3 show how armament weight bought Nelson's missing speedChapter
  8. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    25:23John Brown shaft engineering makes F3 power technically plausibleNotable Point
  9. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    28:30F3 balanced nine heavy guns, 28.5-knot speed, and room for later upgradesChapter
  10. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    31:47F3's forward firing arcs change the risks of a bow-on approachNotable Point
  11. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    33:38Independent operations strengthen the case for aircraft aboard F3Notable Point
  12. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    40:20F3 speed and common ammunition offered peacetime and wartime flexibilityChapter
  13. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    44:53Speed controls the range, angle, and pace of an engagementNotable Point
  14. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    1:09:07F3 machinery could bring fleet speed requirements forwardNotable Point
  15. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    1:19:49Two shafts favored efficiency, while four offered redundancyNotable Point
  16. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    1:22:38Continuous batches could evolve F3 into a fast battleshipChapter
  17. What if HMS Nelson & HMS Rodney were built for speed?
    1:29:45The final choice was 16-inch firepower or another 5.5 knotsNotable Point
  18. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    20:20F2 and F3 as fully armored battlecruisersChapter
  19. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    26:54F2, F3, and Nelson trade speed against armorChapter
  20. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    32:36How could F2 and F3 make 30 knots on two shafts?Q&A
  21. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    36:33Is a fully armored battlecruiser halfway to a fast battleship?Q&A
  22. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    38:00Where would extra F3 displacement go?Q&A
  23. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    46:22A thousand tons could buy Nelson more speedNotable Point
  24. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    56:34Selling F3 through cost and 15-inch standardizationChapter
  25. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    57:25Competing Jutland reports and the case for F3Notable Point
  26. Royal Navy go for speed not bulwark in the Nelson Class design...
    1:12:29F3 expands overseas presence and refit capacityChapter
  27. Bruships 175: Pre- Christmas Party 2024
    1:31:00F3 machinery, two-shaft power, and the gap between peacetime and wartime speedQ&A
  28. Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s
    1:25:29Helicopters make a clear stern more valuableNotable Point
  29. Patreon 95: Helios on Route- A lucky development of helicopters & appropriate tech in 1930s
    2:48:48F3 designs change the fleet's gun standardNotable Point
  30. Naval History Writing Competition 2023/2024
    11:51Choosing the F3 design instead of Nelson and RodneyNotable Point
  31. What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...
    38:55G3 and N3 at opposite ends of the capital-ship spectrumChapter
  32. What Battleships and Battlecruisers that were not built can tell us...
    1:39:34British global commitments and the Lion classChapter
  33. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:13:34F2 and F3: the fast designs behind Nelson's all-forward layoutChapter
  34. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:27:51Would a 15-inch/50 weapon have spread across the Royal Navy?Q&A
  35. Patreon 67: RN use of water Based Armour, and why it annoyed Admiral King so much?
    1:47:04Could Britain trade gun calibre for a third treaty battleship?Q&A
  36. Bruships: A Special - Questions/What ifs till the Bru runs out? (8)
    18:42Why moving the G3's third turret was not a simple fixQ&A