Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
A proposed larger patrol and early-warning fleet would cover Britain and overseas commitments while preserving presence outside the main theatre of a war.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The campaign would have been painful but probably short because the Royal Navy could isolate the landing force while the army mobilized, and revolutionary France might struggle to win broad Irish religious support.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Not much, because Britain already had substantial 737 support infrastructure, access to a huge airframe and parts pool, and strong incentives to operate the systems chosen by the United States and presented as the NATO options.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A larger interwar carrier program could have kept another American aircraft manufacturer alive, but the strategic value would depend on what it actually designed and won orders to build.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
No; the Type 26 can use its larger gun in amphibious and full-spectrum naval operations, while three 76 mm guns would have suited the Type 31 better than a simple swap.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The programme is too undefined for a firm answer, but Japan is an attractive possibility and a Britain-Italy-Japan partnership could be considered if cooperation on Tempest succeeds.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
It could throw a formidable anti-submarine charge, but the weapon would be unnecessarily large and would sacrifice the rapid pattern fire that makes smaller guns and purpose-built mortars useful.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
No clear advantage is expected in either respect; purpose-built mortars already fire large anti-submarine bombs without requiring a full 18-inch naval gun.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A hypothetical 100 km shell fired at roughly twenty rounds per minute illustrates the range and volume of fire that could keep naval guns useful.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A tentative 6-inch gun proposal seeks greater effect per shell at roughly 5-inch rates of fire, while recognising the reluctance left by the AGS programme.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The Canadian Corps combined an exceptional concentration of artillery with mines, tanks, aircraft, and carefully prepared ground operations.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
It would likely combine Sea Dart, Sea Wolf, Harpoon, close-in defence, a medium gun battery, and facilities for several helicopters.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A spot is a flight-deck position that can land or recover one helicopter at a time.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Almost none are, although most designs provide only a single landing spot.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Civil War battle names are suggested as a joking way to make cancellation politically awkward, with selected admirals as another option.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
They would probably be slightly larger, while an installed Hood-style armour scheme would make conversion more complicated.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
They would have filled an intermediate size category suited to yards unable to build the largest fleet destroyers and could have supported useful Cold War conversions.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A comparison of Lexington, Hood, Tiger, and the Invincibles explains why battlecruiser lineage matters more than speed alone.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Hood might reach roughly 45,000 tons and force treaty negotiators to create a distinct high-speed capital-ship allowance.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Not decisively, because Admiral Phillips also consulted US naval planners whose fallback assumptions were closer to operating from Singapore.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
They might outrun the edge of the Japanese strike's range, but faster King George V-class ships would also alter earlier events at Denmark Strait.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
He restrained harder-line policy and later served as a rare intermediary trusted by the government, emperor, and navy to carry out surrender.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
An interpretation of the Philippines' collapse focuses on command paralysis and the failure of senior subordinates to implement earlier plans.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Singapore's docks, fuel, and position made it an Allied theatre-entry base rather than merely a forward operating station.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A Singapore-based coalition raises the possibility of an Allied supreme commander with MacArthur serving beneath that command.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Wind was the main obstacle, with temperature identified as another limiting condition.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Holding Singapore keeps several Allied supply approaches open while forcing Japan to sustain distant operations before it can push farther south.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
They would be overwhelmingly decisive against early World War II conventional forces but would not solve Vietnam's political and guerrilla-war problems.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Larger hulls offer space, but Canada's escort role rewards affordable numbers and anti-submarine breadth more than cruiser-scale command capacity.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The Napoleonic Wars combined heavy government funding with prize income, bond finance, and lucrative protection of trade.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
There were river actions, but they usually resembled contested crossings supported by artillery barges rather than conventional fleet battles.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
If the Free French retain it, the faster carrier could reinforce North Atlantic operations and perhaps join the carrier strikes around the Denmark Strait campaign.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A true fast-battleship protection scheme would help, but the fatal hit was sufficiently exceptional that design blame alone is too simple.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The United States would dominate the air war more completely, but the conflict's logistical, political, and public-support problems would remain.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
German U-boat tonnage targets illustrate the danger of assuming an enemy will leave its methods and production unchanged.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A colonial state that governed through coercion can leave police and military institutions ready to impose order but few civilian checks able to restrain them.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
It is theoretically possible, but recreating the plant and tooling would be enormously expensive. Roughly twenty years is offered as a guess.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
A move towards nuclear carriers could make a nuclear escort attractive for distant operations, while a rival's actual construction programme could supply a prestige incentive.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
They were treated as experimental carriers intended for replacement, so Britain put less emphasis on extensive rebuilding.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
No. It is a general-purpose destroyer built from a strong anti-submarine frigate baseline with a useful but not top-tier air-defence layer.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Yes. A force large enough for a surrender ceremony can make a diplomatic visit look like an invasion or threat.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
By the definition used here, yes: the Ticonderogas are discounted as cruisers in name only and Long Beach serves as the earlier benchmark.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
British reuse of President is explained as a deliberate reminder of the captured American frigate.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Very little, because French construction capacity rather than the quality of the design was the binding constraint.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Existing European projects and Aster improvements are presented as possible routes, with sustained investment and cooperation needed to deliver them.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The Canadian system is described as more open and adaptable, while the American alternative contains more proprietary technology.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
Blockade and besiege Gibraltar, remain at sea, and accept that a Royal Navy attack is a matter of when rather than if.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·
The opening choices favour more fully equipped Type 45s and new-build Nimrods, with particular criticism of deleting Albion and Bulwark's hospital deck and helicopter hangar.
From Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 2 ·