Notable Point · 1:37:10 The preview identifies Pertinax as a former admiral whose bureaucratic and technocratic competence made him an unusually plausible emperor amid Roman political crisis.
From General George S. Hammond USAF: A Science Fiction Flag/General Officer who lives up to the rank! · 16 Apr 2025
Q&A · 1:37 A reading list connects British military power, naval development, and the longer economic origins of the Scramble for Africa.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 5:10 Treaties did not directly cap German ocean liners or cargo ships, but a major expansion could still alarm the established naval powers.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 11:43 Kentucky and Hawaii make the most sense completed as an Iowa-class battleship and Alaska-class large cruiser rather than through costly conversions.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 14:12 The recurring 'Vickers gun salesman' is a shorthand for corporate pressure behind 14-inch naval guns during the treaty era, not a known individual.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 15:34 Some mature gunship technologies arrived only as missiles were making further refinement strategically less valuable.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 18:57 Similar caliber labels conceal substantially different British naval-gun designs from different technological generations.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 19:47 Traditional prize money for captured ships appears to have ended in the nineteenth century, possibly around the Crimean War.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 20:22 The Type 31 fills a cheaper inner-screen and forward-presence role that should not be confused with the Type 26's specialized anti-submarine mission.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 25:10 Building eight Deutschland-class raiders is mainly a shipyard-capacity choice that displaces battleships, carriers, and battlecruisers.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 26:16 The answer broadens surface raiding beyond famous German ships to Age-of-Sail frigates and Allied cruisers capturing Axis merchantmen.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 27:10 Britain can build warships domestically while importing specialized French and Swedish steel, but restoring sovereign plate capacity requires deliberate investment and procurement rules.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 29:28 Replacing an old trawler's machinery and sensors would produce an offshore patrol vessel, not a modern monitor without much deeper reconstruction.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 29:47 Naval treaties did not directly constrain aircraft, though heavier shipbuilding investment might indirectly strengthen power-plant and jet-engine development.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 30:35 Vickers and Armstrong competed internationally before merging into a vertically integrated firm capable of supplying nearly an entire armed force.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 32:33 Engine technology had not reached the power levels that made contra-rotating propellers worthwhile for 1930s carrier aircraft.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 33:22 Courageous, Glorious, Furious, and the Admiral-class concept are identified as problematic in their original forms.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 34:00 A navalized Meteor would have been an imperfect first jet carrier fighter, but probably workable in an emergency.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 34:17 Britain and the United States may have tested sabot concepts unofficially, possibly to create high-energy underwater hits rather than conventional armor penetration.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 34:55 The early Northern Fleet lacked the base infrastructure to support capital ships and could only stretch destroyer facilities to accommodate a cruiser.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 35:47 Ready 16-inch guns, higher volume of fire, and faster series construction favor the historical twelve-gun Montana arrangement over waiting for 18-inch weapons.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 40:12 Sergeant York would be excessive for routine drone defense, but stored vehicles might offer useful emergency protection and real-world test data.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 43:30 A 42- to 45-caliber barrel favors durability, while longer barrels trade more wear and maintenance for pressure, spin, accuracy, and range.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 45:26 Taiwan's terrain, long preparation, submarines, mines, and the acoustic chaos of a mass crossing make a cross-strait assault far harder than fleet totals suggest.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 56:27 A Taiwanese offensive counterstrike might aid immediate survival yet risk foreign support and make conflict termination harder.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 57:02 The short gap between scrapping HMS Vanguard and deciding to preserve HMS Belfast illustrates a failure to recognize historic value in time.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 58:52 US naval turbo-electric propulsion and diesel-electric locomotives reflect common industrial strengths rather than direct technological influence.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live...continued · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 6:38 Fritz X could penetrate deck armor despite looking small beside a battleship shell because it attacked from a much steeper angle.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 10:09 Why liquid in torpedo-defense tanks was removed before a ship rested on dry-dock blocks.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 11:00 Air forces attacked German submarine pens repeatedly, but massive concrete protection limited the operational payoff.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 17:45 A rare configuration-dependent failure passed simulations because testing covered expected conditions rather than every abnormal sequence.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 21:03 Several one-change counterfactuals show how procurement choices can reshape fleets for decades.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 21:23 One counterfactual argues that abandoning Jeune École sooner could have preserved continuous French capital-ship construction and infrastructure.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 21:52 Two answers connect naval-aviation effectiveness to institutional control and to resisting an overly broad multirole requirement.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 23:52 The preferred intervention is procedural: require complete operational testing of the Mark 6 exploder before wartime dependence exposes its faults.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 24:24 Choosing an F3-derived fast battleship instead of the Nelson path could preserve proven ammunition, gun production, and fleet speed.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 27:18 The cruiser discussion distinguishes genuinely efficient small hulls from savings that reduce endurance or long-term value without cutting construction time enough.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 29:43 Worldwide operations, ample exercise resources, and routine live firing gave the interwar Royal Navy repeated chances to expose weapon faults.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 32:05 A playful refit question exposes serious tradeoffs between rebuilding an ancient carrier, buying new hulls, and covering a flight deck with missile systems.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 37:57 Moving the Sea Venom name backward would not simply move Sea Vixen forward because technology and operational experience shape each successor.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 41:34 Higher speed would have complicated the U-boat's firing solution without making Lusitania impossible to hit.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 44:57 A science-fiction fleet discussion weighs carrier-like parasite craft against battleship concentration and light-speed command delays.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 54:00 Guided torpedoes and growing machinery demands removed the tactical and spatial case for stern tubes.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Q&A · 57:38 Candidates for cancellation or replacement include late escort carriers, Audacious-class carriers, and Atlanta-class cruisers.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 58:16 The Weapon class made use of yards able to build something larger than a C-class destroyer but not a full Battle-class ship.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 59:31 Late escort-carrier development is questioned when extra design work and construction time buy little improvement in speed or flight operations.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 1:01:23 One answer would standardize the late British fleet-carrier programme on the Malta class rather than build Audacious-class hulls first.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025
Notable Point · 1:02:04 The counterfactual keeps the Scharnhorst design lineage, enlarges the hull, adds a fourth barbette, and replaces 11-inch guns with 15-inch weapons.
From Bruships 189: Naval History Questions Answered Live... · 13 Apr 2025