Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
A desk reassignment after Samar and Typhoon Cobra would probably change Halsey's reputation by changing how his active wartime career ended.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Plans for Italian naval special forces in the Far East are distinguished from operations against German targets in Italy and the country's internal conflict.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Being ordered during wartime does not make the Wickes and Clemson classes austere war-emergency destroyers.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A late HMS Glasgow would deepen an existing Type 23 availability crisis after lightly built hulls served far beyond their intended lives.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Mark 41 VLS is the clearest Type 31 upgrade, while sonar, Type 32, Type 26, and Type 83 remain constrained by production-line sequencing.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A navy's idea of an inexpensive mass-production escort usually comes from the Second World War class it operated in large numbers.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An Alaska-class large cruiser is considered suitable for a hypothetical prewar Canadian fleet, while a modern equivalent would need substantially more missiles.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The anti-ship missile comparison weighs speed and warhead size against the requirement for an aircraft-launched weapon, with LRASM receiving particular support.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A higher-flying missile can direct a low-flying salvo and be replaced if destroyed, while claims of surprise are challenged by the system's prior publicity.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Two recommendations cover early-medieval British defensive ditches and a fictional officer given a command for which they are poorly suited.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Possessing one AIM-9 Sidewinder in 1939 would not give engineers the computing, seeker, rocket, and manufacturing base needed to field it during the war.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Acquiring HMS Leviathan alongside the loaned Cabot would improve Spanish carrier resilience only if Spain could fund aircraft, maintenance, and later replacements.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Refusing Robert Ballard access to Alvin and Jason would redirect deep-ocean exploration without greatly changing naval historiography.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Maximizing treaty loopholes produces an F3-derived capital ship and an under-declared carrier designed to receive omitted equipment later.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Six modern replenishment ships would integrate into a Second World War Pacific fleet more easily than four Wasp-class amphibious assault ships.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A playful question compares famous bombardments with British target islands whose outlines were altered by generations of naval gunfire.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Disguising Nelson-class battleships as tankers would require such an obvious intelligence leak that German reconnaissance would probably recognize the trap.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Keeping Santa Maria-class frigates in reserve only adds capacity if Spain also maintains crews, reservists, and shipyard space to reactivate them.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A hypothetical London Naval Treaty exposes why 10-inch heavy cruisers and 8-inch light cruisers would produce unattractive ships and destabilize the battleship limit.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Second London Naval Treaty negotiations sidelined naval officers after their technical objections were treated as obstruction.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The explanation attributes the exclusion to treaty advocates associated with international peace groups who regarded naval feasibility objections as obstruction.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A floating nuclear mine created an unacceptable risk that the weapon would drift beyond control.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The postwar Canadian and Australian navies began with carriers, cruisers, submarines, auxiliaries, and strong bases; later political funding choices eroded the structure.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A defended Channel Islands position could complicate German operations and extend Allied radar coverage, but only through early fortification and near-continuous siege conditions.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The first Tiger refit proposals replace propulsion and radar, then question how vertical-launch missile cells would fit inside the old cruiser hull.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Fox proposes using Tiger's space for helicopters while retaining a forward six-inch gun for fire support.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The panel corrects a warning about lost steam expertise for the year 2000, then distinguishes Bristol's crew from the extra personnel needed for the Tigers.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Dragon combines a retained six-inch turret with modern 76 mm guns and a hangar able to support contemporary helicopters.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The most extensive Tiger proposal retains the name and six-inch guns while replacing almost the entire ship.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A force-structure answer argues that Germany could have challenged Britain more effectively with a faster homogeneous battle line than with a miniature global fleet.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The reply distinguishes the global pressures behind the Lion class from the stronger German influence on the step to Tiger.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Admiral design is traced to Fisher's enlarged Invincible concept, with Tiger used to challenge the description of Hood as a fast battleship.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Larger German overseas raiders would provoke matching British deployments, with the Queen Elizabeth class helping to release battlecruisers for global duties.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Japan's later fast-battleship difficulty reflects interrupted construction experience more than a lack of promising early design ideas.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The panel's choices include Penguin, Naval Strike Missile, Brimstone and Talos, with a failed missile prompting discussion of the gap between specifications and reliability.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Rising electrical demand leads to a discussion of nuclear base load, gas-turbine surge power, and the practical size threshold for nuclear surface ships.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Physical reactor fit depends on the installation, while cost determines whether a relatively small nuclear ship is worth building.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Starbug from Red Dwarf supplies a fictional survival advantage for choices including Eskimo, Zubian and a heavily rebuilt Soviet cruiser.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Surface ships can fire laser-guided rockets, extending a long history of naval rocket use with modern precision guidance.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Soviet cruiser tangent weighs shipyard experience gained from inherited hulls against the time and resources saved by starting with a fresh design.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Missile-range, satellite-communications, and cargo support ships would normally be RFA vessels with embarked Royal Navy specialists.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Scrapping the aging Principe de Asturias was reasonable, but Spain's next carrier should follow modern Italian practice rather than revive the Sea Control Ship baseline.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Trieste can already handle the aircraft, while her amphibious duties explain the smaller air group compared with a dedicated carrier.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A heavy-cruiser, Worcester, and Gearing group is powerful for Korean War surface operations but lacks the lift needed for amphibious missions.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An American-aligned unified Korea would add pressure near Vladivostok but would not transform the Soviet naval problem by itself.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A helicopter-carrier question shows why carrier aviation cannot replace landing ships, landing craft, and the heavy equipment needed for a credible Royal Marines deployment.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Campbeltown's transfer to Britain belonged to the destroyers-for-bases agreement.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A vast one-off borrowing package would exceed the Ministry of Defence's near-term ability to spend well; steady orders, people, infrastructure, and procurement discipline matter more.
From Bruships 229: Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·