How Royal Marine commandos became standing units
The wartime commando mission turned existing Royal Marine amphibious expertise into standing formations.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Complete directory
Browse all time notes.
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Russian Black Sea landings and Gallipoli
Russian Black Sea forces treated amphibious movement as a way around fortifications and may have drawn lessons from the British X-lighters at Gallipoli, but their innovations drew little foreign attention.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why the Royal Navy adopted helicopter assault
Late-1940s helicopter practicality, spare carriers, and the need to move small forces rapidly combined to encourage vertical assault.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why unsuppressed defenses mattered at Omaha Beach
The Omaha example shows how geography and incomplete suppression exposed landing forces to surviving machine guns, mortars, and artillery.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Recruiting crews for the landing-craft flotillas
Small crews, close working relationships, and wartime national service made landing-craft billets attractive to some sailors and easier to fill than expected.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
A tentative Volga-Thames barge connection
A caveated aside suggests that Volga lighters and Thames barges shared design influences as builders moved between comparable river-trade problems.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Weather limits and commando modifications
Landing craft carried heavy loads safely only within narrow sea-state limits, prompting commandos to raise freeboard for harsher raids.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why Falklands liners did not become landing ships
A proposed Falklands-era conversion foundered on the practical mismatch between available liners, davits, and landing craft.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why interwar naval intelligence sometimes declined to collect material
A research aside explains how limited information security shaped what navies could collect and retain about foreign technical and amphibious capabilities.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
The central flaws of wartime landing craft
Poor seakeeping and severe discomfort defined the operational limits of wartime landing-craft design.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Where to look for Glenroy conversion plans
A model-building question becomes a practical guide to tracing Glenroy-class plans through published drawings, the National Maritime Museum, and shipyard archives.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why a four-ship Tribal-class listing misleads
A flawed reference-book entry shows how listing four Tribals obscures the class's sixteen-ship wartime strength and twelve losses.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why postwar amphibious fleets consolidated
Smaller expected landings favored ships that bundled many functions, leaving LSD, LPD, and LST types to dominate postwar amphibious fleets.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
How seakeeping helped Tribal-class crews and weapons
Henderson valued larger destroyers as steadier weapon platforms and roomier ships that supported gun performance and stable crews.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
How landing-craft flotillas were organized
Landing craft were grouped to deliver specific troop formations, so flotilla size, crew strength, and command rank varied with the lift task.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
LST wartime scale versus LSD long-term influence
The mass-produced LST was indispensable in the Second World War, while the LSD offered the more influential postwar model.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why LVTs were essential in the Pacific
Coral reefs made the tracked landing vehicle indispensable in the Pacific, while abundant conventional craft reduced its priority in northwest Europe.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Henderson's carrier ideas in the British Pacific Fleet
British Pacific Fleet task groups carried forward Henderson-era carrier design, exercises, and doctrine even though his exact prewar force never fought together.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
How treaty limits constrained Town-class cruisers
Without treaty restrictions, the Town class might have gained modest size, armor, machinery power, and fuel while retaining the same basic design.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why The Battle of the River Plate stands out as a naval film
The Battle of the River Plate is favored for its unusual effort to reproduce the ships, people, and events as accurately as contemporary filmmaking allowed.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
The Ludovic Kennedy connection behind Sink the Bismarck!
The film discussion links Sink the Bismarck! to Ludovic Kennedy's writing and corrects a misconception about his wartime service during the pursuit.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
What early Swedish landing craft reveal
Eighteenth-century Swedish cavalry craft show how horses and other difficult cargo could drive amphibious design requirements.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
British shipyards built more than Japan's famous battleships
Britain's contribution to the early Japanese fleet extended well below the headline battleships to many less celebrated warship types.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
Why an Anglo-Japanese coalition alarmed US planners
A combined Royal Navy and Japanese threat represented the American worst case because it could challenge both coasts before US fleets concentrated.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
The strategic bargain behind the Tizard Mission
Britain's technology transfer accelerated American development while securing the manufacturing capacity and improved equipment Britain urgently needed.
From Bru Ships Episode 0: Update & Some Amphibious Questions Answered ·
How three LST marks divided the design problem
The three Landing Ship Tank marks trace the move from British conversions and limited new builds to American mass production and British refinement.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Who controlled the Pacific shaped the LST Mark III
Britain's decision to build an independent LST design reflected competing Allied priorities over command, postwar influence, and the recovery of imperial territory.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Maracaibo tanker conversions prove the LST concept
Converted tankers demonstrated bow-door vehicle delivery, but their ten-knot maximum, heavy fuel use, and internal compromises constrained a convoy.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Boxer-class speed came with a landing penalty
The purpose-built Boxer class could make 17 knots, but its deeper hull needed a bridge roughly 140 feet long to unload at shallow beaches.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
The LST Mark II made ocean-going tank lift practical
American designers combined bow doors, ramps, diesel-electric machinery, and an Atlantic-capable hull in a tank landing ship that proved unexpectedly survivable.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
The LST Mark III was timed for the Pacific war
Frigate machinery, naval-yard construction, and external pontoons made the British Mark III a refined design timed for planned operations against Japan.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Was D-Day technically an amphibious operation?
Under a narrow doctrinal definition, the Normandy landings were an enormous shore-to-shore movement rather than an assault launched from a sea base.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
D-Day required four years of amphibious preparation
The landing fleet, trained crews, and repeated supply waves explain why the Normandy invasion could not simply have been launched years earlier.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
LST decks became launch platforms for smaller landing craft
A Mark III carrying several probable LCMs shows how an ocean-going ship could bring its own smaller landing craft, though launching them meant a drop of about ten feet.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Even an expert designer could misidentify a landing ship
Mr Baker wrote from direct experience in the Admiralty's wartime landing-ship work, yet the paper appears to misidentify one of the vessels.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Mass production versus incremental refinement
The similar Mark II and Mark III embodied different industrial strategies: American volume against British per-ship refinement.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(iii) ·
Shinshu Maru and the landing ship dock lineage
Why Shinshu Maru was probably the first landing ship dock, yet Allied wartime dock ships developed without directly imitating the Japanese design.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Train ferries become stern-chute landing ships
How prewar carrier studies led British planners to turn short-ranged train ferries into stern-chute ships that could launch eleven LCMs quickly.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Train ferries help rebuild Allied rail logistics after D-Day
Why the ferries resumed locomotive transport after Allied bombing damaged the railways needed to supply the advance from Normandy.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Landing ship gantries provide long-range landing-craft lift
How the limits of stern-chute ships led to long-range gantry conversions of Dale-class RFA oilers that could launch their craft in about thirty-five minutes.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Fresh-water supply for Far East amphibious operations
Plans to retake Singapore and advance toward Japan led to a proposal to dedicate an entire gantry ship to carrying fresh water.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Why Operation Ironclad targeted Madagascar
Why Madagascar mattered to Allied sea routes linking Britain and the United States with Australia, India, and the Persian Gulf in 1942.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Operation Ironclad assembles a complete amphibious fleet
How Ironclad combined troopships, infantry landing ships, a headquarters ship, gantry ships, oilers, and an early LST into an integrated amphibious force.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
The wartime landing ship dock requirement
How a September 1941 requirement called for dock ships that could carry large tank landing craft across operational distances.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
LSTs carry LCT(5)s as deck cargo
An improvised system carried an LCT(5) on an LST's upper deck and launched it over the side, extending the smaller craft's reach.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
The LST's wartime record challenges the 'large slow target' nickname
Why its low loss count and capacity to carry deployable landing craft made the LST one of the war's most important ship types.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Industrial adaptation for mechanized amphibious war
How wartime landing ships adapted familiar cranes, davits, ferries, and liners to the logistical demands of mechanized amphibious assault.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·
Stern-ramp boat launching has a long history
A wartime stern-chute launch shows that navies used ramp-launched small boats long before the concept acquired modern force-multiplier language.
From A Question of Getting Them There - Landing Ships & Amphibious Warfare Part 2(ii) ·