Related time notes
- Bruships 141: Some Cool Books & Naval History Questions Answered34:00Why an all-aft battleship battery is a poor signalQ&A
- Bruships 129: Travels, Rememberance & Questions from Chat1:05:28The US Navy considered an all-aft batteryQ&A
- Bruships 82: New Books, Fun Books & Random Books10:50Why UP.41's aft turret complicated the designNotable Point
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)5:25A wide-beam, fast 1914 British battleship experimentChapter
- Questions of the Equitable Washington Treaty Answered: A UAD Infused Discussion (Long Patrol)36:18All-forward armament and battleship weight distributionNotable Point
- Duquesne class, Marine National (Long Patrol)19:46Three gun levels and the sighting referenceNotable Point
- Duquesne class, Marine National (Long Patrol)41:11Why all-forward armament saves treaty displacementNotable Point
- County Cruisers P6: York, Exeter & The Cut Price County Concept (Long Patrol)1:38Efficient layouts existed beyond cutting down a CountyNotable Point
- Bruships 69: The Decider3:05:20Why all-forward guns suit a battlecruiser better than a battleshipQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response12:22Nelson displacement and the N3 speed estimateQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response22:38G3 blind arcs and concentrated turret firepowerQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response32:15All-forward main guns versus the G3 and N3 Q turretQ&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response33:51Could the X Kiwi design fit a 35,000-ton limit?Q&A
- Washington’s cherry trees: the G3 and N3 class - Patreon 15 Comments Response39:50Dunkerque's aft aviation space and secondary-battery tradeoffsNotable Point