Related time notes
- Bruships 252: Naval History Questions Answered Live...take 244:46Naval guns as reusable multi-purpose launchersNotable Point
- WWI delayed by six years? What would the Navies look like? (Patreon Alternate History)2:33:48Could early carriers answer the largest battleship guns?Q&A
- Durand de la Penne Class: The Destroyer class which showed the Oto Melara 76mm had came of age21:13Layered weapons for air, surface, and undersea threatsChapter
- Bruships 205: Naval History Questions Answered Live...4:01:44What a B-17 needs to attack warships effectivelyQ&A
- Queen Bees: The almost 'Original Drones' from the 1930s3:01How target drones pointed toward remote strike weaponsNotable Point
- Bruships 193: Naval History Questions Answered Live...46:22Submarines as Britain's primary anti-ship platformQ&A
- Bruships 186: Naval History Questions Answered Live...Restart 2!2:11:36Can naval missiles serve secondary anti-ship roles?Q&A
- Bruships 176: Christyear or Newmas?1:05:39Measuring kamikaze attacks by resources and damageQ&A
- Patreon 104: What could have been learned if Billy Mitchell had followed the rules in 1921?1:28:13Coastal aircraft leave trade beyond their reachNotable Point
- Patreon 104: What could have been learned if Billy Mitchell had followed the rules in 1921?2:33:54Would better Army-Navy coordination have helped at Pearl Harbor and Midway?Q&A
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 813:30Torpedo bombers offered a proven way to sink shipsChapter
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 819:28The F5W combined low speed with erratic controlChapter
- The Graf Zepplin's Proposed Teeth: The Fi 167 & JU-87C, Key Aircaft Series 1 - Aircraft 831:58Early-war aircraft depended on torpedoes to sink major shipsNotable Point
- Douglas TBD Devastator: Not So Bad as History Says - Key Aircraft Series 1, Aircraft 640:31Torpedo bombers remained the proven carrier ship-killersNotable Point
- Some Books Aquired So Far in #NavHistAus23! Brisbane17:40Why Tribal destroyers kept torpedoesQ&A
- Slava Class: Comment Response37:00Why a submarine changes the Slava calculationQ&A
- The Submarine Century? How Submarines evolved over the 20th Century2:05:12HMS Conqueror, Belgrano, and the cost of revealing a submarineNotable Point
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations2:29:20Why empty aircraft still mattered at SamarChapter
- Patreon 63: Escort carriers, the idea, designs, development and notable operations2:44:26What if the Taffy groups had prepared for ships?Q&A
- Questions & Answers on Naval History till the Bru Runs Out 21:37:20How Axis forces might attack HabakkukQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...1:55:42What an F-35 could do to BismarckQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...1:58:06Why Moskva might never detect an F-35 attackQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:28:22The Royal Navy's most serious capability gapsQ&A
- Bruships 77: Leadership, books & questions...3:32:14Why Ukraine will keep targeting major Russian warshipsQ&A
- Bruships 72: A Litte Bit of Everything Makes the World54:07Why old Argentine battleships would struggle in 1982Q&A
- Erebus Class: Naval Fire Support of the WWI Western Front Long Patrol Part 812:41FL boats and early uncrewed anti-ship warfareNotable Point
- Bruships 52: A Year of Bruships - Questions & Books3:49:51A modern littoral role for the ekranoplanQ&A
- Minotaur & Tiger Class Cruisers2:22:43Why Tiger kept a rapid-fire six-inch gunQ&A
- Bruships 29: Best Seller History1:07:10Maritime patrol aircraft and heavy bombers: the anti-ship overlapQ&A