Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
An F-8 might operate from Hermes in her catapult-and-arresting-gear configuration, subject to a check of the relevant aircraft weights.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Typhoons and Tempests were useful against coastal shipping and surfaced submarines, but that did not make them dedicated anti-submarine aircraft.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
The prospective Royal Navy escort total is too low for worldwide commitments and a credible carrier group.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Fast liners could sustain maximum speed across the Atlantic, while cruisers risked machinery damage trying to match a duty their engines were not designed to maintain.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Continued peacetime battleship construction would push the earliest 12-inch dreadnoughts into reserve and disposal sooner than the war-interrupted historical fleet did.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Close range and effective spotting both helped Somerville's force inflict heavy damage at Mers-el-Kebir in a short time.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
If Fisher had retained obsolete hulls, minimally crewed and buoyancy-enhanced ships could force a path through the Dardanelles minefields.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
When government fixes the number of hulls below the Navy's requirement, designers maximize the capability of each carrier or destroyer rather than accepting a smaller ship.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
This strategy collection is imperfect but useful for provoking questions about the relation between strategy, planning, and real crises.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Sparta shows how a famous military image can outlast relative power, especially when publicity and psychological warfare obscure Macedonian dominance.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
A third Scharnhorst or Bismarck-class ship would require yard capacity and would likely trigger British political and naval responses.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
A larger British fleet changes the requirement itself, so historical missile systems and ship classes would not all appear earlier in the same sequence.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Converting Texas required cutting planned access routes through the ship to change boilers and bunker arrangements without designing an obvious armor weak point.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Roger Knight's Convoys shows how escorting trade and blockading enemy coasts were intertwined strategic functions in the difficult North Sea.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
King George V-class ships incorporated replaceable armor panels and side access, showing that maintainability could be designed into a protected hull.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Wayne Hughes uses the Falklands War to argue that scouting, comparative force quality, and mission context matter more than claims that missiles made surface warships obsolete.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Without treaty definitions, Britain might have developed 15,000-18,000-ton heavy cruisers with guns clearly larger than the Hawkins class and 7,000-10,000-ton light cruisers.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
A Timothy Walton study of the Spanish treasure fleets leads into wider reading on early-modern strategy and Portuguese history.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Without World War I, the Royal Navy's first-, second-, and third-class protected cruisers would probably be gone by about 1918 to 1920.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
An official account of Operation Iceberg explains how naval gunfire, air attack, and layered small-craft screens reduced the threat from Japanese suicide boats.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
In permissive environments, a Spearhead-type platform is a practical drone carrier because the mission chiefly needs deck and maintenance space.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
A Leander-class frigate would probably fare somewhat better than Ning Hai, though its real protection would come from maneuvering as part of a wider task force.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Several British and Australian ships were hit by kamikazes, but the examples identified here survived and in some cases continued operating.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Richard Humphreys's Under Pressure uses personal experience to contrast brief freedom in Scotland's Inner Sound with the confinement and routine of a ballistic-missile patrol.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
If K3 were selected as the post-Hood battlecruiser, the heavily protected 18-inch-gun L3 would be its battleship counterpart.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
A continuing requirement for dispersed maritime aviation after nuclear attack could justify retaining flying boats, though Britain would likely seek a domestic or joint design.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
British, Australian, and American maritime-strike records are difficult to rank because their aircraft-loss and shipping-destruction figures are compiled differently.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
More shafts reduce loading and build redundancy into a very large capital ship.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
The People's Liberation Army Navy is described as highly motivated and professionally serious, with no fuller comparative judgment offered.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
Knowledge of an unbuilt design depends on how much the navy recorded during the study and whether those reports survived.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
The anti-battleship argument was forward-looking, though aviation was not mature enough to replace capital ships in the 1920s.
From Bruships 123: Naval History Questions and Books on Strategy & Tactics ·
The Star Destroyer label prompts a short history of real destroyers expanding from torpedo-boat work into escort, cruiser-substitute, and aviation roles.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Capital ships are judged by presence, capability, operational reach, fit for the operator, and distinctive advantages rather than by firepower alone.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Aircraft give a carrier a wider combat radius, while a battleship can sometimes create more visible diplomatic influence by entering a port and receiving visitors.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
A mobile capital ship should intercept danger away from its home world rather than become an expensive space station waiting beside the target it must protect.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Owning a prestigious battleship, battlecruiser, or carrier is not enough; the ship must answer the missions, reach, and risk profile of the navy that buys it.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
HMS Warspite illustrates how combat record and public reputation can make a battleship a capital ship with unusual political and psychological weight.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
A nuclear-powered cruiser gains range and independence, but port restrictions can limit the visible presence that makes a capital ship politically useful.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Admiral Kuznetsov's fires, dockyard accident, and long repair history illustrate why a missile battlecruiser can be a more supportable prestige asset for Russia.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
A future Dreadnought-class submarine will inherit Warspite's name, while the battleship's Cornish retirement adds to her reputation for defying expectations.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Yamato's size and combat potential created presence, but keeping the ships secret prevented that presence from shaping an opponent's political calculations.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
USS Georgia shows that a strategic asset can be a capital ship even when concealment, rather than visible presence, is central to its purpose.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
The Chilean example from the South American dreadnought race shows that reliability, conventional design, and ease of support can be virtues even when a ship has no spectacular unique feature.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
The Queen Elizabeth class combines unmistakable national presence with conventional-fuel access and points toward a wider common-aircraft amphibious fleet.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
The Executor-class Super Star Destroyer excels at spectacle and weapons volume, but its logistics burden and concentration of resources make it a poor instrument for controlling a galaxy.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
The Cheops-class pyramid ship fits Goa'uld rule because its monumental appearance projects divinity and fear, even though weak logistics and utility limit it as a practical warship.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
An Imperial Star Destroyer's side-mounted heavy weapons waste the advantage claimed for its wedge-shaped, forward-facing design.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·
Tying fighters and commanders closely to an Imperial Star Destroyer simplifies political control but makes deployments predictable and prevents one force from influencing several systems.
From Capital Ships of Science Fiction: Battlestars to Star Destroyers with a Naval Historian ·