The Italian fleet sorties against Salerno
An Italian attack on Salerno would require political cohesion and would meet a strong Anglo-American naval covering force.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
An Italian attack on Salerno would require political cohesion and would meet a strong Anglo-American naval covering force.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Scores of British 9.2-inch cruisers would threaten isolated capital ships while changing the American and Japanese strategic balance.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A political retreat from battleships and a technical breakthrough would produce very different reactions to Britain's cruiser fleet.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Lexington's speed suggests a cruiser-hunting role, but the proposal is challenged because its armor is vulnerable to 9.2-inch gunfire.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Aircraft choices divide over weapons capacity, gun penetration, Japanese fuel handling, and missile guidance in 1941.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
F135-powered Tomcats could intercept Soviet bombers farther out through supercruise, with airframe speed limits and maintenance still constraining them.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Three Italian carriers and retained Caracciolos would pressure France to complete or redesign its Normandie battleships.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Completing prewar Italian and French hulls raises a disputed treaty question and could replace the construction holiday with continuing, limited building.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Pedestal's failure would mean another British convoy and further suffering on Malta, while an Axis invasion remained difficult to organize.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Malta's terrain makes landing-zone preparation and coordination between amphibious and airborne forces central to an invasion plan.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Malta's aviation fuel, food, and cooking supplies require separate treatment, with disagreement over how Pedestal's loss would affect its survival.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A pre-Pearl Harbor command swap changes readiness and institutional habits more than the war's ultimate outcome.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Rising interwar estimates and the cost of training enlarged the naval fuel reserve beyond the original planning assumptions.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Wartime replenishment qualifies the claim about Britain's large prewar stocks, while Army and aviation supplies require separate treatment.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Blücher's severe damage makes a return as a cruiser unlikely, while a proposed carrier reconstruction draws objections.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Machinery damage would force Hood to withdraw under cover and lead to a major reconstruction while the Bismarck hunt continued.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The cruiser-race question leads to a dispute over pre-treaty calibers and the mixed ten-inch and eight-inch batteries of Italian armored cruisers.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Giving each German Panzerschiff two light cruisers would enlarge British hunting groups and stimulate more cruiser construction.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
More capable German raider groups could push Britain to seek a separate light-carrier allowance and expand naval aviation earlier.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Building light carriers earlier could advance naval control of the Fleet Air Arm and expand the yards available for later cruiser construction.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
French captains who rejected the armistice would bring valuable ships directly into Free French and Allied service.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The ships Fisher eliminated were mostly obsolete placeholders; the more important weakness was failing to replace enough of their global presence.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Naval participation in a land battle could sharply increase artillery weight by supplying guns and railway-mounted support beyond normal army resources.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An unexpectedly large Soviet nuclear missile ship prompts speculative NATO carrier expansion and renewed interest in American strike cruisers.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A proposal to revive the old battleship Texas is distinguished from the nuclear cruiser already serving in 1980.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Underground support for aircraft, submarines, and motor torpedo boats would make Malta a harder and more persistent threat to Axis supply lines.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A large Japanese pilot reserve would ease replacements and is expected to speed the A7M programme, while requiring more training and aircraft production.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Relative size, peacetime roles, and wartime adaptability complicate science-fiction cruiser and battleship labels.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Expensive drives, older capital ships, and layered escort roles produce different class structures in fictional navies.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Peacekeepers of Sol uses ship and service names to preserve the memory of an earlier fictional war.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
One proposed classification reserves cruiser names for independent patrol and exploration duties.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Interchangeable SparrowHawk roles are weighed against weak variants and the Romulans' limited shipbuilding capacity.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An external cargo-pod proposal encounters the setting's warp-geometry constraints.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Claudius's legions in the clarified 1880s scenario would face breech-loading high-explosive artillery.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The Bureau of Ordnance's defence of the defective Mark 14 is judged probably more damaging than the Bomber Mafia's influence.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A licensed pom-pom would give the interwar US Navy a more effective medium anti-aircraft weapon than the 1.1-inch gun.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The fictional service abandons a name associated with atrocities during an earlier human war.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A substantial six-inch battery on Kirov could prompt other navies to reconsider their own gun armament.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A 120 mm belt and 60 mm deck could stop initial six-inch hits, while successive salvos and damage to exposed systems remain concerns.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Building Hood to the K3 design implies a full class of 60,000-ton ships and likely prevents the Washington treaty settlement.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Clarifying Hood's design as J3 changes the armament scale while retaining the argument for four ships and a different treaty settlement.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A rumoured Oklahoma search receives encouragement, with uncertainty about the surviving wreck after salvage and the 1947 tow.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A Dutch fleet from the Anglo-Dutch Wars would be obsolete in World War I and would need to understand a changed European political map.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The machinery transfer is treated sceptically because fuel remains scarce and Japanese gearboxes are considered preferable.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
A German-Japanese engineering comparison is tested against rotary engines and personal vehicle experience.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
The replies compare a 35-38-knot patrol or escort concept with the demands of the proposed 45-knot LCS.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
Retaining the 9.4-inch gun could influence the calibres chosen for foreign armoured cruisers.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·
An anecdote about officer assessments illustrates the difference between useful context and substantiated evidence.
From Bruships 203: What if Naval History Questions Answered Live... ·