How a carrier and battlecruiser hunted raiders
Carrier aircraft supplied wide-area search while a battlecruiser provided reliable heavy striking power against a located surface raider.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
Complete directory
Explore every watch point in reverse video-date order, then in timestamp order within each video.
Carrier aircraft supplied wide-area search while a battlecruiser provided reliable heavy striking power against a located surface raider.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
A battlecruiser's gun caliber often followed contemporary battleship production, so armament alone reveals little about whether the design favored battle or cruiser duties.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
The Falklands War reinforced the Royal Navy's commitment to a useful medium gun on every surface combatant.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
When treaties limited ship numbers or total tonnage by category, the Royal Navy had an incentive to build large destroyers with cruiser-like capability.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
A proposed 15,000-ton ship with twelve 9.2-inch guns remains a cruiser, though it approaches the battlecruiser end of the spectrum.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
The 18-inch gun offered greater shell power but imposed very heavy turrets and structural stresses that made the 15-inch weapon easier to use in a balanced ship.
From Battle cruisers in a ‘modern navy’…. Well a WWII Navy ·
The original battlecruiser was John Fisher's supreme cruiser type, intended for worldwide trade protection, commerce raiding, naval presence, and fleet scouting.
The comparison with battleships, razees, and American 24-pounder frigates shows why a ship optimized for global economic warfare was vulnerable in an artillery slugging match.
A Royal Navy trade map and Article 17 of the Washington Naval Treaty connect battlecruisers to Britain's worldwide economic system and American concern over British shipyards.
The Washington treaty schedule expected Hood, Renown, and Repulse to leave service around 1939-41, but later agreements and strategic conditions kept the ships in use.
Gun elevation, torpedo-bulge accounting, and carrier-conversion allowances show how every navy sought technical advantage within naval treaty language.
Reconstruction could replace so much structure and equipment that a familiar ship name concealed a substantially different vessel.
Hood carried turret-mounted aircraft equipment and later a catapult and crane, but the arrangement worked only in very calm weather and was removed.
Hood's changing secondary and anti-aircraft fit left her original battlecruiser mission intact.
Fisher's wartime bargain for Renown and Repulse leads into the mission-based distinction between a fast ship meant to fight a fleet battle and one meant to control whether battle occurs.
Repeated refits renewed both ships, but Renown received the more complete reconstruction while Repulse awaited another major rebuilding after Hood.
The 1923-24 world cruise of Hood, Repulse, and supporting light cruisers used route choices, port calls, and visible capital ships to reassure allies and display Britain's global naval mobility.
The squadron's route through the South Atlantic, Indian Ocean, and Pacific illustrates how battlecruisers could threaten commerce and exert coercive pressure far from an enemy's concentrated battle fleet.
Major increases in displacement, dimensions, machinery, and armor transformed the Japanese Kongō-class battlecruisers into fast battleships suited to carrier operations.
Germany called Scharnhorst and Gneisenau battleships, while the Royal Navy initially called them battlecruisers because it expected them to operate as commerce raiders.
The Dunkerque class combined forward main armament and stern aviation facilities in a compact fast-battleship design intended to meet several competing threats.
HMS Queen Elizabeth is the preferred battleship because her notable service deserves more recognition.
The Blackburn Buccaneer receives an unqualified endorsement as a very good jet strike aircraft.
Carrier constraints made high power from each single-engine aircraft especially important to the Royal Navy.
The Royal Navy's Daring class is preferred to the US Navy's Gearing class.
US Navy battleships broadly followed the all-or-nothing armor principle.
Churchill's contested Admiralty record does not make him the worst First Lord; several occupants were substantially weaker.
Admiral Andrew Cunningham got on very well with President Franklin D. Roosevelt while serving in Washington.
Theodore Roosevelt's naval histories are recommended as carefully reasoned and worth reading.
The famous 1939 fleet signal announced more than an appointment: it told the Royal Navy that an experienced political champion had returned to the Admiralty.
Banning submarines would not have removed the Royal Navy's need to prepare for undersea warfare.
A larger British carrier air group could have combined more Swordfish with fighter-borne rocket attacks at Taranto.
British light fleet carriers would support Allied landings while larger fleet carriers rotated or returned home.
HMS Furious gets the personal vote among cruiser conversions, with affection kept separate from technical superiority.
Standardizing on American aircraft would simplify support, but aircraft availability mattered more than perfect commonality.
ASDIC and sonar were broadly different names for the same evolving detection technology.
The planned invasion of Japan would require Commonwealth troops, Soviet participation, and follow-on waves beyond the initial assault.
Historians can infer informal ship-design decisions without letting a single document dictate the whole story.
Japan's already devastated economy limited what blockade alone could achieve, while captured ports could support a tighter siege.
The 100,000-casualty estimate did not necessarily imply 90 days of uninterrupted fighting before a possible surrender.
Rocket attacks could strip exposed systems and distract defenders even when they could not penetrate a ship's main armor.
In a counterfactual rerun of the Falklands War, an operational British F-35B force would leave Argentina without a credible matching air capability.
The late-war British naval presence helped rebuild Australian confidence in the Royal Navy while straining local support capacity.
Allied landing craft could shift north to collect Soviet troops after captured ports took over the supply burden.
Army dominance was already established by 1940-41, leaving a China-focused institution to direct a war of global scope.
Occupying Hawaii could have forced the United States to retake the islands before advancing farther across the Pacific.
Britain and the United States could dislike Soviet landings strategically while accepting them as a way to reduce casualties and open additional fronts.
The United States yielded substantial ground at Yalta to secure Soviet participation in the war against Japan.