Q&A ยท 24:24-24:53

Why blockade did not remove the case for invading Japan

Japan's already devastated economy limited what blockade alone could achieve, while captured ports could support a tighter siege.

Question

Could blockade and bombing have forced Japan to surrender without an invasion?

Short answer

Blockade alone was unlikely to force a quick surrender because Japan's economy was already wrecked. Limited landings could seize ports from which to tighten the siege.

Notes

Blockade and bombing had appeared in British planning as alternatives to a full invasion. Japan's economy was already so badly damaged that further strangulation did not promise a quick new result. Limited landings could seize major ports and turn them into forward bases for a tighter blockade. Invasion and blockade could therefore operate in sequence, with captured lodgments making isolation more effective.